GLM 4.6 vs Muse Spark 1.1
Updated October 21, 2026. 53 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
Decision reading
Pick GLM 4.6 for coding: it scores 52.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 48.9 for Muse Spark 1.1.
Pick Muse Spark 1.1 when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 205K tokens, or when what matters is LMArena WebDev or AA Coding Index, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 53
- GLM 4.6 only
- 13
- Muse Spark 1.1 only
- 43
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, four public coding benchmarks
GLM 4.6
GLM 4.6 scores 52.2 against 48.9.
2 and 1 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Muse Spark 1.1
Muse Spark 1.1 leads, 33.7 against 18.5.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Muse Spark 1.1 has a AA Agentic Index result, 25.8.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
Muse Spark 1.1
Muse Spark 1.1 leads, 91.2% against 74.5%.
Same board, both measured
Math
AIME
No call
Only GLM 4.6 has a AIME result, 92.7%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
Muse Spark 1.1
Muse Spark 1.1 leads, 88.7% against 82.2%.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Muse Spark 1.1
Muse Spark 1.1 leads, 1270 against 1174.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
Muse Spark 1.1
Muse Spark 1.1 takes 1.05M tokens against 205K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
GLM 4.6
GLM 4.6 $0.0016, Muse Spark 1.1 $0.0034 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Muse Spark 1.1 has the number, $0.43.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- GLM 4.6 52.2 from 2 benchmarks, Muse Spark 1.1 48.9 from 1 benchmark.
- Widest category
- Coding, 25.0 points apart on average over 7 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): GLM 4.6 3.1% against Muse Spark 1.1 72.2%, 69.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- GLM 4.6 $2.20 against Muse Spark 1.1 $4.25 per million output tokens, 1.9x apart.
- Context window
- GLM 4.6 takes 205K tokens, Muse Spark 1.1 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | GLM 4.6 | Bars | Muse Spark 1.1 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 7 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 1 | ||
| Agentic work | 1 | 3 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 6 | ||
| Math | 0 | 2 | ||
| Knowledge | 0 | 8 | ||
| Web design | 0 | 7 | ||
| General | 0 | 18 | ||
| All shared boards | 1 | 52 |
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index07
| Benchmark | GLM 4.6 | Muse Spark 1.1 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 68.2% | Not measured | Only GLM 4.6 measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1341 | 1542 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| AA Coding Index | 45.8 | 71.3 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 81.0% | 85.9% | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | Not measured | 82.0% | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 3.1% | 72.2% | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | Not measured | 31.1% | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.0% | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 69.3% | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 59.2% | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 69.5% | Not measured | Only GLM 4.6 measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 58.8% | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 28.8% | Not measured | Only GLM 4.6 measured |
| Terminal-Bench | 24.5% | Not measured | Only GLM 4.6 measured |
| ALE-Bench | 340.8 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1449 | 1498 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1455 | 1498 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | Not measured | 1532 | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1350 | 1540 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | Not measured | 1540 | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | GLM 4.6 | Muse Spark 1.1 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 18.5 | 33.7 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | Not measured | 154.1 | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13
| Benchmark | GLM 4.6 | Muse Spark 1.1 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | Not measured | 25.8 | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | Not measured | 1207 | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | 1029 | 1199 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1096 | 1177 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Design Arena: agents building Android apps | 1090 | 1184 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Design Arena: agents building Godot games | 1180 | 1103 | GLM 4.6 |
| Design Arena: agents building games | Not measured | 1183 | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Design Arena: HTML slides | Not measured | 1194 | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Design Arena: PowerPoint slides | Not measured | 1156 | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Design Arena: spreadsheets | Not measured | 974 | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | Not measured | 57.2% | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 38.0% | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 56.4% | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Time Horizon Index (Vals AI) | Not measured | 1.7% | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 76.9% | Not measured | Only GLM 4.6 measured |
| APEX-Agents | Not measured | 31.8% | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | Not measured | $6,520 | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
| Benchmark | GLM 4.6 | Muse Spark 1.1 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 74.5% | 91.2% | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | Not measured | 86.6% | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 78.0% | 89.8% | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 14.5% | 46.2% | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Chess puzzles | Not measured | 34.0% | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1440 | 1485 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1432 | 1478 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1445 | 1480 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1305 | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1287 | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | GLM 4.6 | Muse Spark 1.1 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 92.7% | Not measured | Only GLM 4.6 measured |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | 89.8% | Not measured | Only GLM 4.6 measured |
| AA Math Index | 86.0 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.6 measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 86.0% | Not measured | Only GLM 4.6 measured |
| ProofBench | Not measured | 39.0% | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1432 | 1482 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1447 | 1487 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08
| Benchmark | GLM 4.6 | Muse Spark 1.1 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 82.2% | 88.7% | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 79.6% | 85.0% | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 56.8% | 71.3% | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 66.2% | 79.7% | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | Not measured | 66.1% | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | 92.2% | Not measured | Only GLM 4.6 measured |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 82.9% | Not measured | Only GLM 4.6 measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | Not measured | 57.8% | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1456 | 1484 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1455 | 1479 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1448 | 1481 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1416 | 1470 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
| Benchmark | GLM 4.6 | Muse Spark 1.1 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1174 | 1270 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1147 | 1290 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1151 | 1269 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1161 | 1268 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1129 | 1260 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1166 | 1276 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1108 | 1234 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | Not measured | 1270 | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index018
| Benchmark | GLM 4.6 | Muse Spark 1.1 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 61.3% | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | Not measured | 45.6% | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | Not measured | 88.9% | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Vals Multimodal Index | Not measured | 66.7% | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| IFBench | 43.4% | Not measured | Only GLM 4.6 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 54.0% | 77.7% | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| DTBench | Not measured | 94.4% | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| LMCA | Not measured | 49.9% | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Surface Evolver Bench | Not measured | 52.5% | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| LMArena Text | 1440 | 1478 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1410 | 1457 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1412 | 1435 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Vision | Not measured | 1293 | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1449 | 1478 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1426 | 1471 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1499 | 1515 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: German | 1447 | 1469 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1393 | 1450 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1400 | 1459 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: French | 1459 | 1492 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1436 | 1464 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1418 | 1482 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1447 | 1499 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1427 | 1484 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1422 | 1462 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1415 | 1448 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1409 | 1438 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| LMArena Vision: English | Not measured | 1292 | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1348 | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1301 | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | Not measured | 1288 | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1253 | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| LMArena Document | Not measured | 1465 | Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GLM 4.6 | Muse Spark 1.1 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
GLM 4.6 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
GLM 4.6 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
GLM 4.6 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Z.ai GLM 4.6 | Meta Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Z.ai | Meta |
| Weights | Open weights | No public weights listed |
| Released | September 30, 2025 | July 16, 2026 |
| Context window | 205K | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.55 | $1.25 |
| Output $/Mtok | $2.20 | $4.25 |
| Coding index | 52.2 | 48.9 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 2 | 1 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | $0.43 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is GLM 4.6 better than Muse Spark 1.1 for coding?
Pick GLM 4.6 for coding: it scores 52.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 48.9 for Muse Spark 1.1. Pick Muse Spark 1.1 when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 205K tokens, or when what matters is LMArena WebDev or AA Coding Index, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, GLM 4.6 or Muse Spark 1.1?
GLM 4.6 costs $0.55 per million input tokens and $2.20 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for Muse Spark 1.1 only.
Which has the bigger context window, GLM 4.6 or Muse Spark 1.1?
Muse Spark 1.1, with 1.05M tokens against 205K.
How many benchmarks is the GLM 4.6 vs Muse Spark 1.1 comparison based on?
53 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GLM 4.6's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark 1.1's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.