LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 4.5 vs Muse Spark 1.1

Updated October 21, 2026. 45 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

GLM 4.5Z.ai
Coding
64.2
Overall
12.8
Output $/M
$2.20
0
Muse Spark 1.1Meta
Coding
48.9
Overall
33.7
Output $/M
$4.25
45
vs boards won of 45 shared

Decision reading

Pick GLM 4.5 for coding: it scores 64.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 48.9 for Muse Spark 1.1.

Pick Muse Spark 1.1 when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 131K tokens, or when what matters is LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Shared results
45
GLM 4.5 only
15
Muse Spark 1.1 only
51
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 4.5 64.2 from 1 benchmark, Muse Spark 1.1 48.9 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Intelligence, 20.9 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run): GLM 4.5 13.0% against Muse Spark 1.1 46.2%, 33.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 4.5 $2.20 against Muse Spark 1.1 $4.25 per million output tokens, 1.9x apart.
Context window
GLM 4.5 takes 131K tokens, Muse Spark 1.1 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 4.5BarsMuse Spark 1.1Ties
Coding03
Intelligence01
Reasoning06
Math02
Knowledge08
Web design07
General018
All shared boards045
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for GLM 4.5 and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGLM 4.5Muse Spark 1.1Leader
SWE-bench Verified64.2%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1542Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured71.3Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)67.5%85.9%Muse Spark 1.1
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured82.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured72.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured31.1%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured69.3%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured59.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)73.8%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
SciCodeNot measured58.8%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)22.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
WeirdML40.6%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
ALE-Bench344.8Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding14341498Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: software and IT14401498Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1532Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1540Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1540Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 4.5 and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGLM 4.5Muse Spark 1.1Leader
AA Intelligence Index12.833.7Muse Spark 1.1
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured154.1Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 4.5 and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGLM 4.5Muse Spark 1.1Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured25.8Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1207Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1199Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1177Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1184Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1103Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1183Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1194Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1156Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured974Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured57.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured56.4%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)Not measured1.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom43.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured31.8%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$6,520Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 4.5 and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGLM 4.5Muse Spark 1.1Leader
GPQA Diamond72.2%91.2%Muse Spark 1.1
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured86.6%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)78.2%89.8%Muse Spark 1.1
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)13.0%46.2%Muse Spark 1.1
Chess puzzlesNot measured34.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14291485Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: expert14331478Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14291480Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1305Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1287Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for GLM 4.5 and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGLM 4.5Muse Spark 1.1Leader
AIME86.7%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)94.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)90.8%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
AA Math Index73.7Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)73.7%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
ProofBenchNot measured39.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: math14271482Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: mathematical work14301487Muse Spark 1.1
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 4.5 and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGLM 4.5Muse Spark 1.1Leader
MMLU Pro81.2%88.7%Muse Spark 1.1
LegalBench (Vals AI)75.6%85.0%Muse Spark 1.1
CorpFin (Vals AI)61.0%71.3%Muse Spark 1.1
TaxEval (Vals AI)72.4%79.7%Muse Spark 1.1
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured66.1%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)90.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)83.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured57.8%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: science14441484Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14551479Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: legal and government14381481Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: business and finance14201470Muse Spark 1.1
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
Web design benchmarks for GLM 4.5 and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGLM 4.5Muse Spark 1.1Leader
Design Arena: websites11701270Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: UI components11441290Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: game dev11451269Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: data viz11591268Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: 3D11701260Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: all code categories11651276Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: SVG10961234Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1270Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index018
General benchmarks for GLM 4.5 and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGLM 4.5Muse Spark 1.1Leader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured61.3%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured45.6%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured88.9%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured66.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
IFBench44.1%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)52.7%77.7%Muse Spark 1.1
DTBenchNot measured94.4%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMCANot measured49.9%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)73.4%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured52.5%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text14301478Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: instruction following14041457Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: creative writing13951435Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena VisionNot measured1293Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: English14371478Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: non-English14171471Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Chinese14651515Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: German14071469Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Japanese14151450Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Korean13801459Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: French14181492Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Spanish14541464Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Russian14131482Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Polish14221499Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: multi-turn14151484Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: longer queries14121462Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: writing and language14031448Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14041438Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1292Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1348Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1301Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1288Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1253Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1465Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 4.5 and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGLM 4.5Muse Spark 1.1Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 4.5$0.0017Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.0034Fits in one request

GLM 4.5 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 4.5$0.037Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.075Fits in one request

GLM 4.5 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 4.5$0.142Exceeds the context window
Muse Spark 1.1$0.292Fits in one request

GLM 4.5 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 4.5 and Muse Spark 1.1
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 4.5Meta Muse Spark 1.1
MakerZ.aiMeta
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 25, 2025July 16, 2026
Context window131K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.60$1.25
Output $/Mtok$2.20$4.25
Coding index64.248.9
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.43
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 4.5 better than Muse Spark 1.1 for coding?

Pick GLM 4.5 for coding: it scores 64.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 48.9 for Muse Spark 1.1. Pick Muse Spark 1.1 when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 131K tokens, or when what matters is LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GLM 4.5 or Muse Spark 1.1?

GLM 4.5 costs $0.60 per million input tokens and $2.20 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for Muse Spark 1.1 only.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 4.5 or Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 4.5 vs Muse Spark 1.1 comparison based on?

45 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GLM 4.5's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Muse Spark 1.1's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next