LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemma 4 31B vs Muse Spark Open

Updated October 21, 2026. 16 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Gemma 4 31BGoogle
Coding
38.3
Overall
14.7
Output $/M
$0.40
0
Muse Spark OpenMeta
Coding
62.1
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.25
16
vs boards won of 16 shared

Decision reading

Pick Muse Spark Open for coding: it scores 62.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 38.3 for Gemma 4 31B.

Pick Gemma 4 31B when output tokens cost 10.6x less.

Shared results
16
Gemma 4 31B only
52
Muse Spark Open only
10
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemma 4 31B 38.3 from 2 benchmarks, Muse Spark Open 62.1 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 24.5 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LiveBench research: Gemma 4 31B 44.4% against Muse Spark Open 80.3%, 35.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemma 4 31B $0.40 against Muse Spark Open $4.25 per million output tokens, 10.6x apart.
Context window
Gemma 4 31B takes 262K tokens, Muse Spark Open 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemma 4 31BBarsMuse Spark OpenTies
Coding06
Intelligence01
Agentic work03
Reasoning03
Web design01
General02
All shared boards016
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index06
Coding benchmarks for Gemma 4 31B and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGemma 4 31BMuse Spark OpenLeader
LiveBench coding49.0%73.6%Muse Spark Open
LMArena WebDev13671528Muse Spark Open
AA Coding Index43.4Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured6.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured76.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured21.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
SciCode45.5%58.4%Muse Spark Open
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)36.4%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
WeirdML52.3%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
ALE-Bench925.51590.1Muse Spark Open
LMArena Text: coding1459Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1463Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena WebDev: React13591529Muse Spark Open
LMArena WebDev: HTML13801495Muse Spark Open
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemma 4 31B and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGemma 4 31BMuse Spark OpenLeader
AA Intelligence Index14.7Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
Epoch Capabilities Index143.0155.1Muse Spark Open
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemma 4 31B and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGemma 4 31BMuse Spark OpenLeader
AA Agentic Index4.2Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LiveBench research44.4%80.3%Muse Spark Open
LiveBench browser4.0%36.0%Muse Spark Open
LiveBench long agentic13.3%18.9%Muse Spark Open
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured61.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured26.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.5%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured53.7%Only Muse Spark Open measured
τ²-Bench Telecom65.5%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured33.4%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemma 4 31B and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGemma 4 31BMuse Spark OpenLeader
LiveBench reasoning68.3%73.7%Muse Spark Open
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)85.7%89.0%Muse Spark Open
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)23.6%43.9%Muse Spark Open
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)75.8%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1448Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Text: expert1464Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1456Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1283Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Vision: homework1310Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Gemma 4 31B and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGemma 4 31BMuse Spark OpenLeader
OTIS Mock AIME73.3%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Text: math1463Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1465Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemma 4 31B and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGemma 4 31BMuse Spark OpenLeader
CaseLaw (Vals AI)52.6%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)61.4%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
SimpleQA Verified10.4%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Text: science1457Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1451Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1438Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1430Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Web design benchmarks for Gemma 4 31B and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGemma 4 31BMuse Spark OpenLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1311Only Muse Spark Open measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1290Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench design58.4%60.3%Muse Spark Open
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
General benchmarks for Gemma 4 31B and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGemma 4 31BMuse Spark OpenLeader
LiveBench data analysis53.3%60.2%Muse Spark Open
SAGE (Vals AI)55.0%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
IFBench75.6%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)69.7%78.3%Muse Spark Open
DTBench82.7%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMCA39.3%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
Surface Evolver Bench30.6%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Text1443Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1433Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1417Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Vision1276Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Text: English1451Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Text: non-English1430Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1475Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Text: French1436Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1442Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Text: Russian1460Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Text: Polish1433Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1452Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1446Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1432Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1405Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Vision: English1271Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1326Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1282Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Vision: humor1280Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1218Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1226Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1285Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Document1425Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemma 4 31B and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGemma 4 31BMuse Spark OpenLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemma 4 31B$0.0004Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.0034Fits in one request

Gemma 4 31B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemma 4 31B$0.011Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.075Fits in one request

Gemma 4 31B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemma 4 31B$0.044Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.292Fits in one request

Gemma 4 31B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemma 4 31B and Muse Spark Open
SpecificationGoogle Gemma 4 31BMeta Muse Spark Open
MakerGoogleMeta
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedApril 2, 2026October 15, 2026
Context window262K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.20$1.25
Output $/Mtok$0.40$4.25
Coding index38.362.1
Independent measurements behind it22
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemma 4 31B better than Muse Spark Open for coding?

Pick Muse Spark Open for coding: it scores 62.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 38.3 for Gemma 4 31B. Pick Gemma 4 31B when output tokens cost 10.6x less.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 31B or Muse Spark Open?

Gemma 4 31B costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Muse Spark Open costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemma 4 31B or Muse Spark Open?

Muse Spark Open, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemma 4 31B vs Muse Spark Open comparison based on?

16 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemma 4 31B's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark Open's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gemma-4-31b-it-vs-meta-muse-spark-open" title="Gemma 4 31B vs Muse Spark Open, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gemma-4-31b-it-vs-meta-muse-spark-open">LLMBenchmark.ai, Gemma 4 31B vs Muse Spark Open</a></p>