Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemma 3 27B vs MiniMax M3

MiniMax M3 leads Gemma 3 27B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 29.2 to 4.9, and Gemma 3 27B costs 4.0x less per output token ($0.30 vs $1.20 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 52 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemma 3 27BGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
31.4
Output $/M
$0.30
0
MiniMax M3MiniMax
Coding
39.2
Overall
51.7
Output $/M
$1.20
52
vs boards won of 52 shared

Gemma 3 27B or MiniMax M3: which to pick

Only MiniMax M3 has a coding score, 39.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemma 3 27B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Gemma 3 27B for output tokens 4.0x cheaper ($0.30 vs $1.20 per million).

Shared results
52
Gemma 3 27B only
14
MiniMax M3 only
64
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemma 3 27B not benchmarked, MiniMax M3 39.2 from 6 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 53.9 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Gemma 3 27B 10.5% against MiniMax M3 88.9%, 78.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemma 3 27B $0.30 against MiniMax M3 $1.20 per million output tokens, 4.0x apart.
Context window
Gemma 3 27B takes 131K tokens, MiniMax M3 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemma 3 27BBarsMiniMax M3Ties
Coding05
Intelligence02
Agentic work02
Reasoning08
Math03
Knowledge04
General028
All shared boards052
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index05
Coding benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BMiniMax M3Leader
Aider polyglot4.9%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LiveBench codingNot measured70.9%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1482Only MiniMax M3 measured
AA Coding Index10.158.6MiniMax M3
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured82.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured75.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured1.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured47.6%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured19.9%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured53.6%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured33.3%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured9.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured51.5%Only MiniMax M3 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured65.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)13.7%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
SciCode23.3%47.1%MiniMax M3
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)3.8%42.4%MiniMax M3
FrontierCodeNot measured14.7%Only MiniMax M3 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured640.0Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: coding13221470MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: software and IT13541466MiniMax M3
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1478Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1455Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1470Only MiniMax M3 measured
SciCode0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BMiniMax M3Leader
AA Intelligence Index4.929.2MiniMax M3
Epoch Capabilities Index130.0146.9MiniMax M3
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BMiniMax M3Leader
AA Agentic Index0.129.5MiniMax M3
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1200Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1197Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1169Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1159Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1158Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1130Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1181Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1028Only MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured68.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured8.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured12.4%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured48.3%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured20.6%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured29.8%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured47.8%Only MiniMax M3 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom10.5%88.9%MiniMax M3
APEX-AgentsNot measured37.7%Only MiniMax M3 measured
OSWorld 2.0Not measured4.6%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$2,158Only MiniMax M3 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)29.5%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BMiniMax M3Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured92.7%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured74.5%Only MiniMax M3 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured81.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)42.8%92.9%MiniMax M3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.4%39.0%MiniMax M3
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)47.7%90.9%MiniMax M3
SimpleBenchNot measured45.8%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured13.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured8.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13401447MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: expert13041461MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13531455MiniMax M3
LMArena Vision: diagrams11561266MiniMax M3
LMArena Vision: homework11601268MiniMax M3
Kagi LLM Benchmark35.1%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Math benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BMiniMax M3Leader
AA Math Index20.7Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)20.7%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
OTIS Mock AIME22.5%71.1%MiniMax M3
ProofBenchNot measured18.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
MATH level 574.0%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: math13121429MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: mathematical work13271448MiniMax M3
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BMiniMax M3Leader
MMLU ProNot measured84.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.4%Only MiniMax M3 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured68.1%Only MiniMax M3 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured72.7%Only MiniMax M3 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured68.4%Only MiniMax M3 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured46.3%Only MiniMax M3 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)66.9%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
GeoBench52.0%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: science13831452MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13911441MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: legal and government13751437MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: business and finance13601434MiniMax M3
FACTS Benchmark Suite29.1%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BMiniMax M3Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1257Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1242Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1210Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1236Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1208Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1247Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1161Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1161Only MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench designNot measured66.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index028
General benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BMiniMax M3Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured76.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured64.1%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured50.6%Only MiniMax M3 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured87.3%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured60.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
IFBench31.8%82.9%MiniMax M3
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)7.3%83.0%MiniMax M3
DTBench52.5%78.9%MiniMax M3
LMCA12.3%33.7%MiniMax M3
Fiction.LiveBench33.3%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)79.9%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured55.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text13581433MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: instruction following13211433MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: creative writing13451404MiniMax M3
LMArena Vision11651251MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: English13771443MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: non-English13341420MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: Chinese13461466MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: German13621428MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: Japanese12871380MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: Korean13081373MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: French13681444MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: Spanish13491433MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: Russian13491426MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: Polish13451423MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: multi-turn13451443MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: longer queries13331446MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: writing and language13471419MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13201403MiniMax M3
LMArena Vision: English11881263MiniMax M3
LMArena Vision: Chinese11641311MiniMax M3
LMArena Vision: reading text11561259MiniMax M3
LMArena Vision: humor11661235MiniMax M3
LMArena Vision: captioning1151Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things11961197MiniMax M3
LMArena Vision: creative writing11771234MiniMax M3
LMArena DocumentNot measured1435Only MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BMiniMax M3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemma 3 27B$0.0002Fits in one request
MiniMax M3$0.0009Fits in one request

Gemma 3 27B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemma 3 27B$0.0049Fits in one request
MiniMax M3$0.019Fits in one request

Gemma 3 27B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemma 3 27B$0.019Exceeds the context window
MiniMax M3$0.072Fits in one request

Gemma 3 27B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemma 3 27B and MiniMax M3
SpecificationGoogle Gemma 3 27BMiniMax M3
MakerGoogleMiniMax
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 12, 2025May 31, 2026
Context window131K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.08$0.30
Output $/Mtok$0.30$1.20
Coding indexNot benchmarked39.2
Independent measurements behind it06
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.56
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemma 3 27B better than MiniMax M3 for coding?

Only MiniMax M3 has a coding score, 39.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemma 3 27B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemma 3 27B for output tokens 4.0x cheaper ($0.30 vs $1.20 per million).

Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 27B or MiniMax M3?

Gemma 3 27B costs $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; MiniMax M3 costs $0.30 and $1.20. Cost per solved task is known for MiniMax M3 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemma 3 27B or MiniMax M3?

MiniMax M3, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemma 3 27B vs MiniMax M3 comparison based on?

52 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemma 3 27B's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and MiniMax M3's on 6. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next