Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemma 3 27B vs Muse Spark 1.2

Muse Spark 1.2 leads Gemma 3 27B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 39.6 to 4.9, and Gemma 3 27B costs 14.2x less per output token ($0.30 vs $4.25 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 39 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemma 3 27BGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
31.4
Output $/M
$0.30
0
Muse Spark 1.2Meta
Coding
55.7
Overall
60.4
Output $/M
$4.25
39
vs boards won of 39 shared

Gemma 3 27B or Muse Spark 1.2: which to pick

Only Muse Spark 1.2 has a coding score, 55.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemma 3 27B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Gemma 3 27B for output tokens 14.2x cheaper ($0.30 vs $4.25 per million).

Shared results
39
Gemma 3 27B only
27
Muse Spark 1.2 only
58
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemma 3 27B not benchmarked, Muse Spark 1.2 55.7 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 43.1 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Gemma 3 27B 7.3% against Muse Spark 1.2 79.0%, 71.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemma 3 27B $0.30 against Muse Spark 1.2 $4.25 per million output tokens, 14.2x apart.
Context window
Gemma 3 27B takes 131K tokens, Muse Spark 1.2 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemma 3 27BBarsMuse Spark 1.2Ties
Coding04
Intelligence02
Agentic work01
Reasoning06
Math02
Knowledge04
General020
All shared boards039
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
Coding benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BMuse Spark 1.2Leader
Aider polyglot4.9%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LiveBench codingNot measured78.2%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1534Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
AA Coding Index10.172.2Muse Spark 1.2
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured86.6%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured6.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured79.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured29.9%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured21.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured69.7%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured53.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)13.7%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
SciCode23.3%57.4%Muse Spark 1.2
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)3.8%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
FrontierSWENot measured12.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
WeirdMLNot measured60.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: coding13221505Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: software and IT13541505Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1526Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1543Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SciCode0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BMuse Spark 1.2Leader
AA Intelligence Index4.939.6Muse Spark 1.2
Epoch Capabilities Index130.0155.1Muse Spark 1.2
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BMuse Spark 1.2Leader
AA Agentic Index0.143.2Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1221Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1210Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1181Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1222Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1179Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1085Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1172Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured67.7%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured36.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured21.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured60.6%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured32.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured43.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured57.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured64.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom10.5%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured45.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)29.5%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BMuse Spark 1.2Leader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured90.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured86.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)42.8%90.4%Muse Spark 1.2
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.4%45.5%Muse Spark 1.2
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)47.7%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
SimpleBenchNot measured74.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured27.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13401489Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: expert13041475Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13531487Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision: diagrams11561317Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision: homework1160Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark35.1%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BMuse Spark 1.2Leader
AA Math Index20.7Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)20.7%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
OTIS Mock AIME22.5%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
ProofBenchNot measured43.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MATH level 574.0%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: math13121484Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: mathematical work13271480Muse Spark 1.2
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BMuse Spark 1.2Leader
MMLU ProNot measured88.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured70.9%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured80.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured65.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured49.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)66.9%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured60.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
GeoBench52.0%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: science13831500Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13911496Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: legal and government13751517Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: business and finance13601484Muse Spark 1.2
FACTS Benchmark Suite29.1%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BMuse Spark 1.2Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1312Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1298Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1301Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1334Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1301Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1312Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1284Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1284Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench designNot measured67.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index020
General benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BMuse Spark 1.2Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured76.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured68.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured47.7%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured90.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured69.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
IFBench31.8%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)7.3%79.0%Muse Spark 1.2
DTBench52.5%94.7%Muse Spark 1.2
LMCA12.3%48.4%Muse Spark 1.2
Fiction.LiveBench33.3%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)79.9%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text13581482Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: instruction following13211462Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: creative writing13451436Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision11651304Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: English13771483Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: non-English13341476Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: Chinese13461509Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: German1362Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1287Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: Korean13081462Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: French13681495Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: Spanish13491484Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: Russian13491483Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: Polish1345Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn13451502Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: longer queries13331473Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: writing and language13471453Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13201443Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision: English11881291Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision: Chinese1164Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Vision: reading text11561313Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision: humor1166Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1151Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1196Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1177Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BMuse Spark 1.2Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemma 3 27B$0.0002Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.2$0.0034Fits in one request

Gemma 3 27B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemma 3 27B$0.0049Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.2$0.075Fits in one request

Gemma 3 27B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemma 3 27B$0.019Exceeds the context window
Muse Spark 1.2$0.292Fits in one request

Gemma 3 27B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemma 3 27B and Muse Spark 1.2
SpecificationGoogle Gemma 3 27BMeta Muse Spark 1.2
MakerGoogleMeta
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedMarch 12, 2025August 5, 2026
Context window131K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.08$1.25
Output $/Mtok$0.30$4.25
Coding indexNot benchmarked55.7
Independent measurements behind it05
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.64
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemma 3 27B better than Muse Spark 1.2 for coding?

Only Muse Spark 1.2 has a coding score, 55.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemma 3 27B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemma 3 27B for output tokens 14.2x cheaper ($0.30 vs $4.25 per million).

Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 27B or Muse Spark 1.2?

Gemma 3 27B costs $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.2 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for Muse Spark 1.2 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemma 3 27B or Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemma 3 27B vs Muse Spark 1.2 comparison based on?

39 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemma 3 27B's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark 1.2's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next