Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemma 3 12B vs Muse Spark 1.1

Muse Spark 1.1 leads Gemma 3 12B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 33.7 to 3.8, and Gemma 3 12B costs 26.2x less per output token ($0.1625 vs $4.25 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 32 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemma 3 12BGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
28.0
Output $/M
$0.1625
0
Muse Spark 1.1Meta
Coding
70.3
Overall
67.0
Output $/M
$4.25
32
vs boards won of 32 shared

Gemma 3 12B or Muse Spark 1.1: which to pick

Only Muse Spark 1.1 has a coding score, 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemma 3 12B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Gemma 3 12B for output tokens 26.2x cheaper ($0.1625 vs $4.25 per million).

Shared results
32
Gemma 3 12B only
11
Muse Spark 1.1 only
64
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemma 3 12B not benchmarked, Muse Spark 1.1 70.3 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 43.7 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Gemma 3 12B 8.3% against Muse Spark 1.1 77.7%, 69.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemma 3 12B $0.1625 against Muse Spark 1.1 $4.25 per million output tokens, 26.2x apart.
Context window
Gemma 3 12B takes 131K tokens, Muse Spark 1.1 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemma 3 12BBarsMuse Spark 1.1Ties
Coding04
Intelligence02
Agentic work01
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
General014
All shared boards032
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
Coding benchmarks for Gemma 3 12B and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BMuse Spark 1.1Leader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1542Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
AA Coding Index5.871.3Muse Spark 1.1
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.9%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured82.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured72.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured31.1%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured69.3%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured59.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)13.7%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 12B measured
SciCode16.4%58.8%Muse Spark 1.1
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)0.8%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 12B measured
LMArena Text: coding12811498Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: software and IT13131498Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1532Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1540Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1540Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SciCode0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 12B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemma 3 12B and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BMuse Spark 1.1Leader
AA Intelligence Index3.833.7Muse Spark 1.1
Epoch Capabilities Index123.5154.1Muse Spark 1.1
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemma 3 12B and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BMuse Spark 1.1Leader
AA Agentic Index0.125.8Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1207Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1199Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1175Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1178Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1103Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1183Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1195Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1155Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1042Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured57.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured56.4%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)Not measured1.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom10.8%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 12B measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured31.8%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$6,520Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)30.4%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 12B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemma 3 12B and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BMuse Spark 1.1Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured91.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured86.6%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)34.9%89.8%Muse Spark 1.1
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.2%46.2%Muse Spark 1.1
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)39.5%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 12B measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured34.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13091485Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: expert12481478Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13181480Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1305Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1287Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Gemma 3 12B and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BMuse Spark 1.1Leader
AA Math Index18.3Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 12B measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)18.3%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 12B measured
OTIS Mock AIME16.7%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 12B measured
ProofBenchNot measured39.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: math13071482Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: mathematical work13361487Muse Spark 1.1
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemma 3 12B and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BMuse Spark 1.1Leader
MMLU ProNot measured88.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured71.3%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured79.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured66.1%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)59.5%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 12B measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured57.8%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: science13661484Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13341479Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: legal and government13811481Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: business and finance13761470Muse Spark 1.1
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemma 3 12B and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BMuse Spark 1.1Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1270Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1289Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1269Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1268Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1260Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1276Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1235Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1271Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index014
General benchmarks for Gemma 3 12B and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BMuse Spark 1.1Leader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured61.3%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured45.6%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured88.9%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured66.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
IFBench36.7%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 12B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)8.3%77.7%Muse Spark 1.1
DTBench48.8%94.4%Muse Spark 1.1
LMCA4.5%49.9%Muse Spark 1.1
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured52.5%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text13341478Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: instruction following12991457Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: creative writing13311435Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena VisionNot measured1293Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: English13491478Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: non-English13181471Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1515Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: German13701469Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1450Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1459Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1492Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1464Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: Russian13351482Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1499Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn13341484Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: longer queries13171462Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: writing and language13071448Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12971438Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1292Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1348Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1301Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1288Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1253Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1465Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemma 3 12B and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BMuse Spark 1.1Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemma 3 12B$0.0002Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.0034Fits in one request

Gemma 3 12B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemma 3 12B$0.0042Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.075Fits in one request

Gemma 3 12B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemma 3 12B$0.017Exceeds the context window
Muse Spark 1.1$0.292Fits in one request

Gemma 3 12B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemma 3 12B and Muse Spark 1.1
SpecificationGoogle Gemma 3 12BMeta Muse Spark 1.1
MakerGoogleMeta
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedMarch 13, 2025July 16, 2026
Context window131K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.075$1.25
Output $/Mtok$0.1625$4.25
Coding indexNot benchmarked70.3
Independent measurements behind it03
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.43
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemma 3 12B better than Muse Spark 1.1 for coding?

Only Muse Spark 1.1 has a coding score, 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemma 3 12B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemma 3 12B for output tokens 26.2x cheaper ($0.1625 vs $4.25 per million).

Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 12B or Muse Spark 1.1?

Gemma 3 12B costs $0.075 per million input tokens and $0.1625 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for Muse Spark 1.1 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemma 3 12B or Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemma 3 12B vs Muse Spark 1.1 comparison based on?

32 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemma 3 12B's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark 1.1's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next