Gemma 2 27B vs MiniMax M3
Gemma 2 27B costs 1.8x less per output token than MiniMax M3 ($0.65 vs $1.20 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 34 benchmarks have a result for both.
Gemma 2 27B or MiniMax M3: which to pick
Only MiniMax M3 has a coding score, 39.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemma 2 27B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Gemma 2 27B for output tokens 1.8x cheaper ($0.65 vs $1.20 per million).
- Shared results
- 34
- Gemma 2 27B only
- 2
- MiniMax M3 only
- 82
- Like-for-like categories
- 6 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only MiniMax M3 has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only MiniMax M3 has a AA Intelligence Index result, 29.2.
Directional only
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only MiniMax M3 has a AA Agentic Index result, 29.5.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only MiniMax M3 has a GPQA Diamond result, 92.7%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only MiniMax M3 has a MMLU Pro result, 84.2%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only MiniMax M3 has a Design Arena: websites result, 1257.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
MiniMax M3
MiniMax M3 takes 1.05M tokens against 8K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
MiniMax M3
Gemma 2 27B $0.0010, MiniMax M3 $0.0009 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only MiniMax M3 has the number, $0.56.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Gemma 2 27B not benchmarked, MiniMax M3 39.2 from 6 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Math, 47.9 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- OTIS Mock AIME: Gemma 2 27B 1.4% against MiniMax M3 71.1%, 69.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Gemma 2 27B $0.65 against MiniMax M3 $1.20 per million output tokens, 1.8x apart.
- Context window
- Gemma 2 27B takes 8K tokens, MiniMax M3 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Gemma 2 27B | Bars | MiniMax M3 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 2 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 1 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 4 | ||
| Math | 0 | 3 | ||
| Knowledge | 0 | 5 | ||
| General | 0 | 19 | ||
| All shared boards | 0 | 34 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | MiniMax M3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | Not measured | 70.9% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LMArena WebDev | Not measured | 1482 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 58.6 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 82.2% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | Not measured | 75.0% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 1.0% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 47.6% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | Not measured | 19.9% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 53.6% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | Not measured | 33.3% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 9.2% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 51.5% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 65.0% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 47.1% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 42.4% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| FrontierCode | Not measured | 14.7% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 640.0 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1211 | 1470 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1228 | 1466 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | Not measured | 1478 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | Not measured | 1455 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | Not measured | 1470 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | MiniMax M3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | Not measured | 29.2 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122.1 | 146.9 | MiniMax M3 |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | MiniMax M3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | Not measured | 29.5 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | Not measured | 1200 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | Not measured | 1197 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | Not measured | 1169 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Android apps | Not measured | 1159 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building games | Not measured | 1158 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Design Arena: HTML slides | Not measured | 1130 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Design Arena: PowerPoint slides | Not measured | 1181 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Design Arena: spreadsheets | Not measured | 1028 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LiveBench research | Not measured | 68.0% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LiveBench browser | Not measured | 8.0% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | Not measured | 12.4% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | Not measured | 48.3% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 20.6% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 29.8% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 47.8% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | Not measured | 88.9% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| APEX-Agents | Not measured | 37.7% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| OSWorld 2.0 | Not measured | 4.6% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | Not measured | $2,158 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | MiniMax M3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | Not measured | 92.7% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LiveBench reasoning | Not measured | 74.5% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | Not measured | 81.2% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 92.9% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 39.0% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 36.5% | 90.9% | MiniMax M3 |
| SimpleBench | Not measured | 45.8% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Chess puzzles | Not measured | 13.0% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | Not measured | 8.0% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1198 | 1447 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1171 | 1461 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1206 | 1455 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1266 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1268 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | MiniMax M3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 1.4% | 71.1% | MiniMax M3 |
| ProofBench | Not measured | 18.0% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| MATH level 5 | 27.9% | Not measured | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1212 | 1429 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1221 | 1448 | MiniMax M3 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | MiniMax M3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | Not measured | 84.2% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 68.0% | 85.4% | MiniMax M3 |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | Not measured | 68.1% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | Not measured | 72.7% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | Not measured | 68.4% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | Not measured | 46.3% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| MMLU | 75.7% | Not measured | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1228 | 1452 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1198 | 1441 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1241 | 1437 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1208 | 1434 | MiniMax M3 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | MiniMax M3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | Not measured | 1257 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | Not measured | 1242 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | Not measured | 1210 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1236 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | Not measured | 1208 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | Not measured | 1247 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | Not measured | 1161 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | Not measured | 1161 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LiveBench design | Not measured | 66.2% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index019
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | MiniMax M3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench data analysis | Not measured | 76.2% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 64.1% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | Not measured | 50.6% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | Not measured | 87.3% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Vals Multimodal Index | Not measured | 60.0% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| IFBench | Not measured | 82.9% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | Not measured | 83.0% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| DTBench | 48.0% | 78.9% | MiniMax M3 |
| LMCA | 7.1% | 33.7% | MiniMax M3 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | Not measured | 55.0% | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LMArena Text | 1231 | 1433 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1206 | 1433 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1240 | 1404 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Vision | Not measured | 1251 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1242 | 1443 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1217 | 1420 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1221 | 1466 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: German | 1209 | 1428 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1175 | 1380 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1174 | 1373 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: French | 1248 | 1444 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1228 | 1433 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1234 | 1426 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1277 | 1423 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1224 | 1443 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1230 | 1446 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1249 | 1419 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1212 | 1403 | MiniMax M3 |
| LMArena Vision: English | Not measured | 1263 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1311 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1259 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | Not measured | 1235 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | Not measured | 1197 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1234 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| LMArena Document | Not measured | 1435 | Only MiniMax M3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | MiniMax M3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
MiniMax M3 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
MiniMax M3 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
MiniMax M3 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Google Gemma 2 27B | MiniMax M3 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | MiniMax | |
| Weights | Open weights | Open weights |
| Released | July 13, 2024 | May 31, 2026 |
| Context window | 8K | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.65 | $0.30 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.65 | $1.20 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | 39.2 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 6 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | $0.56 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Gemma 2 27B better than MiniMax M3 for coding?
Only MiniMax M3 has a coding score, 39.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemma 2 27B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemma 2 27B for output tokens 1.8x cheaper ($0.65 vs $1.20 per million).
Which is cheaper, Gemma 2 27B or MiniMax M3?
Gemma 2 27B costs $0.65 per million input tokens and $0.65 per million output tokens; MiniMax M3 costs $0.30 and $1.20. Cost per solved task is known for MiniMax M3 only.
Which has the bigger context window, Gemma 2 27B or MiniMax M3?
MiniMax M3, with 1.05M tokens against 8K.
How many benchmarks is the Gemma 2 27B vs MiniMax M3 comparison based on?
34 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemma 2 27B's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and MiniMax M3's on 6. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.