Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemma 2 27B vs Grok 4.3

Gemma 2 27B costs 3.8x less per output token than Grok 4.3 ($0.65 vs $2.50 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 33 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemma 2 27BGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.65
0
Grok 4.3xAI
Coding
37.4
Overall
53.1
Output $/M
$2.50
33
vs boards won of 33 shared

Gemma 2 27B or Grok 4.3: which to pick

Only Grok 4.3 has a coding score, 37.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemma 2 27B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Gemma 2 27B for output tokens 3.8x cheaper ($0.65 vs $2.50 per million).

Shared results
33
Gemma 2 27B only
3
Grok 4.3 only
71
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemma 2 27B not benchmarked, Grok 4.3 37.4 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 50.0 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: Gemma 2 27B 1.4% against Grok 4.3 93.3%, 91.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemma 2 27B $0.65 against Grok 4.3 $2.50 per million output tokens, 3.8x apart.
Context window
Gemma 2 27B takes 8K tokens, Grok 4.3 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemma 2 27BBarsGrok 4.3Ties
Coding02
Reasoning04
Math03
Knowledge05
General019
All shared boards033
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Gemma 2 27B and Grok 4.3
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BGrok 4.3Leader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1358Only Grok 4.3 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured42.2Only Grok 4.3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured84.5%Only Grok 4.3 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured71.4%Only Grok 4.3 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured19.4%Only Grok 4.3 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured6.8%Only Grok 4.3 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Grok 4.3 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured42.0%Only Grok 4.3 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured40.6%Only Grok 4.3 measured
SciCodeNot measured48.3%Only Grok 4.3 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured37.9%Only Grok 4.3 measured
WeirdMLNot measured49.9%Only Grok 4.3 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured944.2Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: coding12111415Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: software and IT12281416Grok 4.3
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1353Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1367Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1375Only Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemma 2 27B and Grok 4.3
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BGrok 4.3Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured24.9Only Grok 4.3 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index122.1Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index16 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemma 2 27B and Grok 4.3
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BGrok 4.3Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured15.5Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1126Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1006Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1059Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured961Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured914Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1007Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1008Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1013Only Grok 4.3 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured37.7%Only Grok 4.3 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured6.2%Only Grok 4.3 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured15.4%Only Grok 4.3 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured18.4%Only Grok 4.3 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured97.7%Only Grok 4.3 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$35Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena SearchNot measured1166Only Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemma 2 27B and Grok 4.3
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BGrok 4.3Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured91.4%Only Grok 4.3 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured83.1%Only Grok 4.3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured90.1%Only Grok 4.3 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured37.2%Only Grok 4.3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)36.5%88.8%Grok 4.3
Chess puzzlesNot measured18.0%Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts11981396Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: expert11711384Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12061402Grok 4.3
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1241Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1241Only Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Math benchmarks for Gemma 2 27B and Grok 4.3
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BGrok 4.3Leader
OTIS Mock AIME1.4%93.3%Grok 4.3
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured42.8%Only Grok 4.3 measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured14.6%Only Grok 4.3 measured
ProofBenchNot measured11.0%Only Grok 4.3 measured
MATH level 527.9%Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMArena Text: math12121387Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: mathematical work12211396Grok 4.3
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemma 2 27B and Grok 4.3
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BGrok 4.3Leader
MMLU ProNot measured85.8%Only Grok 4.3 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)68.0%84.5%Grok 4.3
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured79.3%Only Grok 4.3 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured68.5%Only Grok 4.3 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured70.8%Only Grok 4.3 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured48.3%Only Grok 4.3 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured38.1%Only Grok 4.3 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured33.2%Only Grok 4.3 measured
MMLU75.7%Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMArena Text: science12281399Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare11981384Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: legal and government12411386Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: business and finance12081381Grok 4.3
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemma 2 27B and Grok 4.3
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BGrok 4.3Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1196Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1192Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1174Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1179Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1125Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1187Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1081Only Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1125Only Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index019
General benchmarks for Gemma 2 27B and Grok 4.3
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BGrok 4.3Leader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured51.7%Only Grok 4.3 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured19.7%Only Grok 4.3 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured74.4%Only Grok 4.3 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured43.3%Only Grok 4.3 measured
IFBenchNot measured83.3%Only Grok 4.3 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured75.0%Only Grok 4.3 measured
DTBench48.0%90.7%Grok 4.3
LMCA7.1%38.3%Grok 4.3
LMArena Text12311397Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: instruction following12061366Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: creative writing12401380Grok 4.3
LMArena VisionNot measured1229Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: English12421404Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: non-English12171385Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: Chinese12211422Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: German12091395Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: Japanese11751379Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: Korean11741354Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: French12481411Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: Spanish12281399Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: Russian12341399Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: Polish12771398Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: multi-turn12241406Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: longer queries12301393Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: writing and language12491385Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12121370Grok 4.3
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1235Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1257Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1235Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1222Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1217Only Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1237Only Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemma 2 27B and Grok 4.3
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BGrok 4.3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemma 2 27B$0.0010Fits in one request
Grok 4.3$0.0025Fits in one request

Gemma 2 27B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemma 2 27B$0.034Exceeds the context window
Grok 4.3$0.070Fits in one request

Gemma 2 27B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemma 2 27B$0.137Exceeds the context window
Grok 4.3$0.275Fits in one request

Gemma 2 27B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemma 2 27B and Grok 4.3
SpecificationGoogle Gemma 2 27BSpaceXAI Grok 4.3
MakerGooglexAI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 13, 2024April 30, 2026
Context window8K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.65$1.25
Output $/Mtok$0.65$2.50
Coding indexNot benchmarked37.4
Independent measurements behind it03
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.31
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemma 2 27B better than Grok 4.3 for coding?

Only Grok 4.3 has a coding score, 37.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemma 2 27B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemma 2 27B for output tokens 3.8x cheaper ($0.65 vs $2.50 per million).

Which is cheaper, Gemma 2 27B or Grok 4.3?

Gemma 2 27B costs $0.65 per million input tokens and $0.65 per million output tokens; Grok 4.3 costs $1.25 and $2.50. Cost per solved task is known for Grok 4.3 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemma 2 27B or Grok 4.3?

Grok 4.3, with 1M tokens against 8K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemma 2 27B vs Grok 4.3 comparison based on?

33 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemma 2 27B's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Grok 4.3's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next