Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Qwen3 32B

Gemini 3.6 Flash leads Qwen3 32B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 34.0 to 7.3, and Qwen3 32B costs 9.4x less per output token ($0.40 vs $3.75 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 33 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle
Coding
62.5
Overall
68.3
Output $/M
$3.75
33
Qwen3 32BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
40.8
Output $/M
$0.40
0
vs boards won of 33 shared

Gemini 3.6 Flash or Qwen3 32B: which to pick

Only Gemini 3.6 Flash has a coding score, 62.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 32B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3 32B for output tokens 9.4x cheaper ($0.40 vs $3.75 per million).

Shared results
33
Gemini 3.6 Flash only
76
Qwen3 32B only
12
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 3.6 Flash 62.5 from 4 benchmarks, Qwen3 32B not benchmarked.
Widest category
General, 30.0 points apart on average over 15 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Gemini 3.6 Flash 80.0% against Qwen3 32B 0.0%, 80.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 3.6 Flash $3.75 against Qwen3 32B $0.40 per million output tokens, 9.4x apart.
Context window
Gemini 3.6 Flash takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3 32B 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 3.6 FlashBarsQwen3 32BTies
Coding30
Intelligence20
Reasoning60
Math30
Knowledge40
General150
All shared boards330
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index30
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.6 Flash and Qwen3 32B
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashQwen3 32BLeader
Aider polyglotNot measured40.0%Only Qwen3 32B measured
LMArena WebDev1538Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
AA Coding Index69.2Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)88.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)79.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)64.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Code migration (Vals AI)30.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
IOI (Vals AI)35.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)73.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)45.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured54.6%Only Qwen3 32B measured
SciCode53.4%36.0%Gemini 3.6 Flash
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured3.0%Only Qwen3 32B measured
FrontierCode34.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
WeirdML56.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
ALE-Bench715.5Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding14911357Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: software and IT14921366Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena WebDev: React1528Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1547Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1545Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
SciCode10.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.6 Flash and Qwen3 32B
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashQwen3 32BLeader
AA Intelligence Index34.07.3Gemini 3.6 Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index154.5138.4Gemini 3.6 Flash
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index19 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.6 Flash and Qwen3 32B
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashQwen3 32BLeader
AA Agentic Index29.0Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1197Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1181Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1199Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1203Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building games1181Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1148Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1146Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1034Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)56.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)18.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)25.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)65.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)58.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)4.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured29.8%Only Qwen3 32B measured
APEX-Agents46.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)Not measured48.7%Only Qwen3 32B measured
BrowseComp-PlusNot measured10.7%Only Qwen3 32B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.6 Flash and Qwen3 32B
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashQwen3 32BLeader
GPQA Diamond93.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)88.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)92.8%66.8%Gemini 3.6 Flash
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)40.8%7.4%Gemini 3.6 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)94.1%65.7%Gemini 3.6 Flash
ARC-AGI91.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
ARC-AGI-260.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Chess puzzles42.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Mystery game puzzles30.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14861334Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: expert14901362Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14841350Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Vision: diagrams1314Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homework1314Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured48.7%Only Qwen3 32B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.6 Flash and Qwen3 32B
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashQwen3 32BLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured73.0Only Qwen3 32B measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured73.0%Only Qwen3 32B measured
OTIS Mock AIME94.2%66.9%Gemini 3.6 Flash
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 358.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tier 422.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
ProofBench36.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena Text: math15081399Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: mathematical work14921420Gemini 3.6 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3.6 Flash and Qwen3 32B
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashQwen3 32BLeader
MMLU Pro89.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)86.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)63.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)67.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
MedCode (Vals AI)53.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured79.8%Only Qwen3 32B measured
SimpleQA Verified66.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena Text: science14891372Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14691368Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: legal and government14791324Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: business and finance14641318Gemini 3.6 Flash
FACTS Benchmark Suite65.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3.6 Flash and Qwen3 32B
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashQwen3 32BLeader
Design Arena: websites1300Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: UI components1297Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: game dev1263Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: data viz1289Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: 3D1272Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: all code categories1290Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1281Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index150
General benchmarks for Gemini 3.6 Flash and Qwen3 32B
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashQwen3 32BLeader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)56.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)48.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)79.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Vals Multimodal Index65.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
IFBenchNot measured36.3%Only Qwen3 32B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)80.0%0.0%Gemini 3.6 Flash
DTBench95.5%67.5%Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMCA44.9%17.3%Gemini 3.6 Flash
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured74.2%Only Qwen3 32B measured
Furniture assembly23.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena Text14801340Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: instruction following14671305Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: creative writing14661297Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Vision1299Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena Text: English14821359Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: non-English14701317Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: Chinese15311357Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: German14801341Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: Japanese1475Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Korean1429Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena Text: French1503Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1476Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Russian14881311Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: Polish1473Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14811331Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: longer queries14751327Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: writing and language14701298Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14561279Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Vision: English1295Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1357Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1312Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: humor1289Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1278Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena Document1456Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3.6 Flash and Qwen3 32B
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashQwen3 32BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.6 Flash$0.0026Fits in one request
Qwen3 32B$0.0003Fits in one request

Qwen3 32B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.6 Flash$0.049Fits in one request
Qwen3 32B$0.0082Fits in one request

Qwen3 32B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.6 Flash$0.188Fits in one request
Qwen3 32B$0.032Exceeds the context window

Qwen3 32B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.6 Flash and Qwen3 32B
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 3.6 FlashQwen3 32B
MakerGoogleQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 21, 2026April 28, 2025
Context window1.05M131K
Input $/Mtok$0.75$0.14
Output $/Mtok$3.75$0.40
Coding index62.5Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it40
Cost per solved task$1.49Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.6 Flash better than Qwen3 32B for coding?

Only Gemini 3.6 Flash has a coding score, 62.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 32B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 32B for output tokens 9.4x cheaper ($0.40 vs $3.75 per million).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Qwen3 32B?

Gemini 3.6 Flash costs $0.75 per million input tokens and $3.75 per million output tokens; Qwen3 32B costs $0.14 and $0.40. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.6 Flash only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Qwen3 32B?

Gemini 3.6 Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Qwen3 32B comparison based on?

33 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 3.6 Flash's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 32B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next