Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs GLM 4.6V

Gemini 3.6 Flash leads GLM 4.6V on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 34.0 to 11.2, and GLM 4.6V costs 4.2x less per output token ($0.90 vs $3.75 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 31 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle
Coding
62.5
Overall
68.3
Output $/M
$3.75
31
GLM 4.6VZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.90
0
vs boards won of 31 shared

Gemini 3.6 Flash or GLM 4.6V: which to pick

Only Gemini 3.6 Flash has a coding score, 62.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; GLM 4.6V has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 4.6V for output tokens 4.2x cheaper ($0.90 vs $3.75 per million).

Shared results
31
Gemini 3.6 Flash only
78
GLM 4.6V only
7
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 3.6 Flash 62.5 from 4 benchmarks, GLM 4.6V not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 22.8 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Gemini 3.6 Flash 80.0% against GLM 4.6V 48.7%, 31.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 3.6 Flash $3.75 against GLM 4.6V $0.90 per million output tokens, 4.2x apart.
Context window
Gemini 3.6 Flash takes 1.05M tokens, GLM 4.6V 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 3.6 FlashBarsGLM 4.6VTies
Coding20
Intelligence10
Reasoning70
Knowledge40
General170
All shared boards310
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.6 Flash and GLM 4.6V
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashGLM 4.6VLeader
LMArena WebDev1538Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
AA Coding Index69.2Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)88.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)79.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)64.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Code migration (Vals AI)30.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
IOI (Vals AI)35.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)73.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)45.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured41.1%Only GLM 4.6V measured
SciCode53.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured14.4%Only GLM 4.6V measured
FrontierCode34.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
WeirdML56.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
ALE-Bench715.5Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding14911389Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: software and IT14921391Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena WebDev: React1528Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1547Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1545Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
SciCode10.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.6 Flash and GLM 4.6V
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashGLM 4.6VLeader
AA Intelligence Index34.011.2Gemini 3.6 Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index154.5Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.6 Flash and GLM 4.6V
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashGLM 4.6VLeader
AA Agentic Index29.0Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1197Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1181Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1199Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1203Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building games1181Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1148Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1146Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1034Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)56.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)18.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)25.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)65.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)58.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)4.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured31.6%Only GLM 4.6V measured
APEX-Agents46.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index70
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.6 Flash and GLM 4.6V
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashGLM 4.6VLeader
GPQA Diamond93.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)88.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)92.8%71.9%Gemini 3.6 Flash
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)40.8%9.6%Gemini 3.6 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)94.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
ARC-AGI91.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
ARC-AGI-260.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Chess puzzles42.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Mystery game puzzles30.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14861367Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: expert14901371Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14841391Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Vision: diagrams13141182Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Vision: homework13141155Gemini 3.6 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.6 Flash and GLM 4.6V
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashGLM 4.6VLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured85.3Only GLM 4.6V measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured85.3%Only GLM 4.6V measured
OTIS Mock AIME94.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 358.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tier 422.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
ProofBench36.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena Text: math1508Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1492Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3.6 Flash and GLM 4.6V
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashGLM 4.6VLeader
MMLU Pro89.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)86.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)63.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)67.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
MedCode (Vals AI)53.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured79.9%Only GLM 4.6V measured
SimpleQA Verified66.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena Text: science14891389Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14691389Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: legal and government14791393Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: business and finance14641359Gemini 3.6 Flash
FACTS Benchmark Suite65.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3.6 Flash and GLM 4.6V
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashGLM 4.6VLeader
Design Arena: websites1300Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: UI components1297Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: game dev1263Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: data viz1289Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: 3D1272Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: all code categories1290Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1281Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index170
General benchmarks for Gemini 3.6 Flash and GLM 4.6V
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashGLM 4.6VLeader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)56.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)48.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)79.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Vals Multimodal Index65.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
IFBenchNot measured30.1%Only GLM 4.6V measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)80.0%48.7%Gemini 3.6 Flash
DTBench95.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMCA44.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Furniture assembly23.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena Text14801376Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: instruction following14671350Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: creative writing14661347Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Vision12991164Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: English14821395Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: non-English14701358Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: Chinese15311425Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: German1480Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1475Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Korean1429Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena Text: French1503Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1476Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Russian14881339Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: Polish1473Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14811359Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: longer queries14751357Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: writing and language14701347Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14561343Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Vision: English12951179Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Vision: Chinese13571217Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Vision: reading text13121171Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Vision: humor1289Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing12781113Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Document1456Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3.6 Flash and GLM 4.6V
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashGLM 4.6VLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.6 Flash$0.0026Fits in one request
GLM 4.6V$0.0008Fits in one request

GLM 4.6V costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.6 Flash$0.049Fits in one request
GLM 4.6V$0.018Fits in one request

GLM 4.6V costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.6 Flash$0.188Fits in one request
GLM 4.6V$0.069Exceeds the context window

GLM 4.6V costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.6 Flash and GLM 4.6V
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 3.6 FlashZ.ai GLM 4.6V
MakerGoogleZ.ai
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 21, 2026December 8, 2025
Context window1.05M131K
Input $/Mtok$0.75$0.30
Output $/Mtok$3.75$0.90
Coding index62.5Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it40
Cost per solved task$1.49Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.6 Flash better than GLM 4.6V for coding?

Only Gemini 3.6 Flash has a coding score, 62.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; GLM 4.6V has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 4.6V for output tokens 4.2x cheaper ($0.90 vs $3.75 per million).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.6 Flash or GLM 4.6V?

Gemini 3.6 Flash costs $0.75 per million input tokens and $3.75 per million output tokens; GLM 4.6V costs $0.30 and $0.90. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.6 Flash only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.6 Flash or GLM 4.6V?

Gemini 3.6 Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.6 Flash vs GLM 4.6V comparison based on?

31 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 3.6 Flash's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and GLM 4.6V's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next