Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Gemma 3 27B

Gemini 3.6 Flash leads Gemma 3 27B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 34.0 to 4.9, and Gemma 3 27B costs 12.5x less per output token ($0.30 vs $3.75 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 50 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle
Coding
62.5
Overall
68.3
Output $/M
$3.75
50
Gemma 3 27BGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
31.4
Output $/M
$0.30
0
vs boards won of 50 shared

Gemini 3.6 Flash or Gemma 3 27B: which to pick

Only Gemini 3.6 Flash has a coding score, 62.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemma 3 27B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Gemma 3 27B for output tokens 12.5x cheaper ($0.30 vs $3.75 per million).

Shared results
50
Gemini 3.6 Flash only
59
Gemma 3 27B only
16
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 3.6 Flash 62.5 from 4 benchmarks, Gemma 3 27B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 43.9 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Gemini 3.6 Flash 80.0% against Gemma 3 27B 7.3%, 72.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 3.6 Flash $3.75 against Gemma 3 27B $0.30 per million output tokens, 12.5x apart.
Context window
Gemini 3.6 Flash takes 1.05M tokens, Gemma 3 27B 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 3.6 FlashBarsGemma 3 27BTies
Coding50
Intelligence20
Agentic work10
Reasoning80
Math30
Knowledge50
General260
All shared boards500
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index50
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.6 Flash and Gemma 3 27B
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashGemma 3 27BLeader
Aider polyglotNot measured4.9%Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena WebDev1538Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
AA Coding Index69.210.1Gemini 3.6 Flash
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)88.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)79.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)64.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Code migration (Vals AI)30.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
IOI (Vals AI)35.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)73.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)45.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured13.7%Only Gemma 3 27B measured
SciCode53.4%23.3%Gemini 3.6 Flash
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured3.8%Only Gemma 3 27B measured
FrontierCode34.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
WeirdML56.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
ALE-Bench715.5Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding14911322Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: software and IT14921354Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena WebDev: React1528Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1547Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1545Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
SciCode10.8%0.0%Gemini 3.6 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.6 Flash and Gemma 3 27B
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashGemma 3 27BLeader
AA Intelligence Index34.04.9Gemini 3.6 Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index154.5130.0Gemini 3.6 Flash
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.6 Flash and Gemma 3 27B
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashGemma 3 27BLeader
AA Agentic Index29.00.1Gemini 3.6 Flash
Design Arena: agents building web apps1197Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1181Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1198Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1204Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building games1180Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1099Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1121Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1071Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)56.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)18.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)25.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)65.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)58.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)4.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured10.5%Only Gemma 3 27B measured
APEX-Agents46.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)Not measured29.5%Only Gemma 3 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index80
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.6 Flash and Gemma 3 27B
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashGemma 3 27BLeader
GPQA Diamond93.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)88.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)92.8%42.8%Gemini 3.6 Flash
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)40.8%4.4%Gemini 3.6 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)94.1%47.7%Gemini 3.6 Flash
ARC-AGI91.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
ARC-AGI-260.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Chess puzzles42.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Mystery game puzzles30.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14861340Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: expert14901304Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14841353Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Vision: diagrams13141156Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Vision: homework13141160Gemini 3.6 Flash
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured35.1%Only Gemma 3 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.6 Flash and Gemma 3 27B
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashGemma 3 27BLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured20.7Only Gemma 3 27B measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured20.7%Only Gemma 3 27B measured
OTIS Mock AIME94.2%22.5%Gemini 3.6 Flash
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 358.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tier 422.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
ProofBench36.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
MATH level 5Not measured74.0%Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: math15081312Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: mathematical work14921327Gemini 3.6 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3.6 Flash and Gemma 3 27B
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashGemma 3 27BLeader
MMLU Pro89.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)86.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)63.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)67.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
MedCode (Vals AI)53.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured66.9%Only Gemma 3 27B measured
SimpleQA Verified66.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
GeoBenchNot measured52.0%Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: science14891383Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14691391Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: legal and government14791375Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: business and finance14641360Gemini 3.6 Flash
FACTS Benchmark Suite65.3%29.1%Gemini 3.6 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3.6 Flash and Gemma 3 27B
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashGemma 3 27BLeader
Design Arena: websites1300Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: UI components1294Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: game dev1263Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: data viz1289Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: 3D1271Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: all code categories1289Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1281Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index260
General benchmarks for Gemini 3.6 Flash and Gemma 3 27B
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashGemma 3 27BLeader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)56.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)48.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)79.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Vals Multimodal Index65.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
IFBenchNot measured31.8%Only Gemma 3 27B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)80.0%7.3%Gemini 3.6 Flash
DTBench95.5%52.5%Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMCA44.9%12.3%Gemini 3.6 Flash
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured33.3%Only Gemma 3 27B measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured79.9%Only Gemma 3 27B measured
Furniture assembly23.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena Text14801358Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: instruction following14671321Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: creative writing14661345Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Vision12991165Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: English14821377Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: non-English14701334Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: Chinese15311346Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: German14801362Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: Japanese14751287Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: Korean14291308Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: French15031368Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: Spanish14761349Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: Russian14881349Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: Polish14731345Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: multi-turn14811345Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: longer queries14751333Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: writing and language14701347Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14561320Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Vision: English12951188Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Vision: Chinese13571164Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Vision: reading text13121156Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Vision: humor12891166Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1151Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1196Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing12781177Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Document1456Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3.6 Flash and Gemma 3 27B
BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashGemma 3 27BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.6 Flash$0.0026Fits in one request
Gemma 3 27B$0.0002Fits in one request

Gemma 3 27B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.6 Flash$0.049Fits in one request
Gemma 3 27B$0.0049Fits in one request

Gemma 3 27B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.6 Flash$0.188Fits in one request
Gemma 3 27B$0.019Exceeds the context window

Gemma 3 27B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.6 Flash and Gemma 3 27B
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle Gemma 3 27B
MakerGoogleGoogle
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 21, 2026March 12, 2025
Context window1.05M131K
Input $/Mtok$0.75$0.08
Output $/Mtok$3.75$0.30
Coding index62.5Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it40
Cost per solved task$1.49Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.6 Flash better than Gemma 3 27B for coding?

Only Gemini 3.6 Flash has a coding score, 62.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemma 3 27B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemma 3 27B for output tokens 12.5x cheaper ($0.30 vs $3.75 per million).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Gemma 3 27B?

Gemini 3.6 Flash costs $0.75 per million input tokens and $3.75 per million output tokens; Gemma 3 27B costs $0.08 and $0.30. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.6 Flash only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Gemma 3 27B?

Gemini 3.6 Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Gemma 3 27B comparison based on?

50 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemini 3.6 Flash's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Gemma 3 27B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next