Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Gemini 3.5 Flash leads MiMo-V2.5-Pro on coding, 39.8 to 31.6 on the Vibe Coding Index, and MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs 9.8x less per output token ($0.9152 vs $9.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 68 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace Gemini 3.5 Flash Replace MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle
Coding
39.8
Overall
63.8
Output $/M
$9.00
58
MiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomi
Coding
31.6
Overall
39.3
Output $/M
$0.9152
9
vs boards won of 68 shared, 1 tied

Gemini 3.5 Flash or MiMo-V2.5-Pro: which to pick

Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash for coding: it scores 39.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 31.6 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.

Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro for output tokens 9.8x cheaper ($0.9152 vs $9.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.03 against $1.21).

Model AGemini 3.5 FlashGoogle39.8/1004 independent benchmarks$1.21 per solved taskModel BMiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomi31.6/1004 independent benchmarks$0.03 per solved task
Shared results
68
Gemini 3.5 Flash only
44
MiMo-V2.5-Pro only
2
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 3.5 Flash 39.8 from 4 benchmarks, MiMo-V2.5-Pro 31.6 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 10.2 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
MedCode (Vals AI): Gemini 3.5 Flash 55.8% against MiMo-V2.5-Pro 32.5%, 23.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 3.5 Flash $9.00 against MiMo-V2.5-Pro $0.9152 per million output tokens, 9.8x apart.
Context window
Gemini 3.5 Flash takes 1.05M tokens, MiMo-V2.5-Pro 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 3.5 FlashBarsMiMo-V2.5-ProTies
Coding122
Intelligence10
Agentic work50
Reasoning42
Math30
Knowledge90
Web design611 tie
General184
All shared boards5891 tie
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index122
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashMiMo-V2.5-ProLeader
LMArena WebDev14991480Gemini 3.5 Flash
AA Coding IndexNot measured60.2Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)87.6%81.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)78.8%74.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)6.1%0.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)48.7%34.1%Gemini 3.5 Flash
Code migration (Vals AI)26.8%21.6%Gemini 3.5 Flash
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)74.2%57.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash
SkillsBench (Vals AI)52.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SciCode53.9%50.6%Gemini 3.5 Flash
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)46.2%43.2%Gemini 3.5 Flash
WeirdML62.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
ALE-Bench911.0899.8Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: coding14931501MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: software and IT14941495MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena WebDev: React14951469Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena WebDev: HTML15221473Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena WebDev: from an image1504Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SciCode12.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashMiMo-V2.5-ProLeader
AA Intelligence Index33.626.0Gemini 3.5 Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index154.9Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashMiMo-V2.5-ProLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured21.3Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1202Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1197Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1174Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1185Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1098Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building games1180Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1093Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1154Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)57.9%41.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)21.6%11.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)30.8%15.9%Gemini 3.5 Flash
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)63.5%55.2%Gemini 3.5 Flash
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)5.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
τ²-Bench Telecom95.6%94.2%Gemini 3.5 Flash
APEX-Agents27.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Vending-Bench 2$5,396Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index42
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashMiMo-V2.5-ProLeader
GPQA Diamond92.7%82.6%Gemini 3.5 Flash
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)88.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)92.2%86.6%Gemini 3.5 Flash
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)42.7%35.7%Gemini 3.5 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)92.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
ARC-AGI92.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
ARC-AGI-272.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SimpleBench76.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Chess puzzles45.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Mystery game puzzles32.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
EBR-bench4.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14881486Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: expert14951501MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14831494MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Vision: diagrams1323Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homework1330Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashMiMo-V2.5-ProLeader
OTIS Mock AIME95.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 362.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tier 426.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
ProofBench31.0%22.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: math15041481Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: mathematical work14951491Gemini 3.5 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index90
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashMiMo-V2.5-ProLeader
MMLU Pro89.5%84.6%Gemini 3.5 Flash
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.6%77.1%Gemini 3.5 Flash
CorpFin (Vals AI)64.7%61.4%Gemini 3.5 Flash
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.4%73.8%Gemini 3.5 Flash
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
MedCode (Vals AI)55.8%32.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash
SimpleQA Verified66.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: science14951482Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14831473Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: legal and government14881474Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: business and finance14671466Gemini 3.5 Flash
FACTS Benchmark Suite63.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index61
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashMiMo-V2.5-ProLeader
Design Arena: websites12671266Gemini 3.5 Flash
Design Arena: UI components12691246Gemini 3.5 Flash
Design Arena: game dev12631261Gemini 3.5 Flash
Design Arena: data viz12361257MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Design Arena: 3D12431243Tie
Design Arena: all code categories12661265Gemini 3.5 Flash
Design Arena: SVG12531181Gemini 3.5 Flash
Design Arena: ASCII art12541156Gemini 3.5 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index184
General benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashMiMo-V2.5-ProLeader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)59.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)49.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)76.6%83.7%MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Vals Multimodal Index62.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
IFBench76.3%79.9%MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)74.3%79.7%MiMo-V2.5-Pro
DTBench94.7%84.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMCA47.1%29.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash
Surface Evolver Bench58.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text14821464Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: instruction following14671475MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: creative writing14701438Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Vision1308Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: English14811477Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: non-English14751448Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Chinese15271507Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: German14941459Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Japanese14861410Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Korean14481435Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: French14901487Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Spanish14801469Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Russian14931449Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Polish15161464Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: multi-turn14811476Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: longer queries14831481Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: writing and language14781451Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14591438Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Vision: English1305Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1377Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1317Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: humor1321Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1301Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Document1463Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashMiMo-V2.5-ProLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash$0.0060Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.5-Pro$0.0009Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash$0.102Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.5-Pro$0.026Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash$0.390Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.5-Pro$0.101Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.5 Flash and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 3.5 FlashXiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MakerGoogleXiaomi
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMay 19, 2026April 22, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$1.50$0.4575
Output $/Mtok$9.00$0.9152
Coding index39.831.6
Independent measurements behind it44
Cost per solved task$1.21$0.03
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro for coding?

Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash for coding: it scores 39.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 31.6 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro. Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro for output tokens 9.8x cheaper ($0.9152 vs $9.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.03 against $1.21).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Gemini 3.5 Flash costs $1.50 per million input tokens and $9.00 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs $0.4575 and $0.9152. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Gemini 3.5 Flash costs $1.21 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro $0.03.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.5 Flash or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.5 Flash vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro comparison based on?

68 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemini 3.5 Flash's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and MiMo-V2.5-Pro's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-vs-xiaomi-mimo-v2-5-pro" title="Gemini 3.5 Flash vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-vs-xiaomi-mimo-v2-5-pro">LLMBenchmark.ai, Gemini 3.5 Flash vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro</a></p>