Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

Gemini 3.5 Flash leads Nemotron 3.5 Lightning on coding, 39.8 to 22.6 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs 61.2x less per output token ($0.147 vs $9.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 17 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle
Coding
39.8
Overall
63.8
Output $/M
$9.00
16
Nemotron 3.5 LightningNVIDIA
Coding
22.6
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.147
0
vs boards won of 17 shared, 1 tied

Gemini 3.5 Flash or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: which to pick

Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash for coding: it scores 39.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 22.6 for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning.

Pick Nemotron 3.5 Lightning for output tokens 61.2x cheaper ($0.147 vs $9.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.06 against $1.21).

Shared results
17
Gemini 3.5 Flash only
95
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning only
3
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 3.5 Flash 39.8 from 4 benchmarks, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 22.6 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
General, 43.1 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
MedScribe (Vals AI): Gemini 3.5 Flash 76.6% against Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 4.3%, 72.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 3.5 Flash $9.00 against Nemotron 3.5 Lightning $0.147 per million output tokens, 61.2x apart.
Context window
Gemini 3.5 Flash takes 1.05M tokens, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 3.5 FlashBarsNemotron 3.5 LightningTies
Coding601 tie
Intelligence10
Agentic work40
Reasoning20
Knowledge10
General20
All shared boards1601 tie
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index60
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashNemotron 3.5 LightningLeader
LMArena WebDev1499Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured26.8Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)87.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)78.8%52.8%Gemini 3.5 Flash
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)6.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)48.7%0.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash
Code migration (Vals AI)26.8%3.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%0.0%Tie
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)74.2%10.9%Gemini 3.5 Flash
SkillsBench (Vals AI)52.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured29.5%Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
SciCode53.9%32.1%Gemini 3.5 Flash
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)46.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
WeirdML62.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
ALE-Bench911.0769.2Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: coding1493Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1494Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: React1495Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1522Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1504Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SciCode12.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashNemotron 3.5 LightningLeader
AA Intelligence Index33.612.9Gemini 3.5 Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index154.9Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashNemotron 3.5 LightningLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured3.5Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1202Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1197Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1174Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1185Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1098Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building games1180Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1093Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1154Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)57.9%18.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)21.6%2.6%Gemini 3.5 Flash
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)30.8%2.9%Gemini 3.5 Flash
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)63.5%17.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)5.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
τ²-Bench Telecom95.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
APEX-Agents27.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Vending-Bench 2$5,396Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashNemotron 3.5 LightningLeader
GPQA Diamond92.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)88.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)92.2%74.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)42.7%10.6%Gemini 3.5 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)92.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
ARC-AGI92.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
ARC-AGI-272.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SimpleBench76.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Chess puzzles45.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Mystery game puzzles32.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
EBR-bench4.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1488Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: expert1495Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1483Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1323Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homework1330Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashNemotron 3.5 LightningLeader
OTIS Mock AIME95.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 362.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tier 426.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
ProofBench31.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: math1504Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1495Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashNemotron 3.5 LightningLeader
MMLU Pro89.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)64.7%54.2%Gemini 3.5 Flash
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
MedCode (Vals AI)55.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SimpleQA Verified66.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: science1495Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1483Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1488Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1467Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
FACTS Benchmark Suite63.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashNemotron 3.5 LightningLeader
Design Arena: websites1267Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: UI components1269Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: game dev1263Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: data viz1236Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: 3D1243Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: all code categories1266Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: SVG1253Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1254Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
General benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashNemotron 3.5 LightningLeader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)59.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)49.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)76.6%4.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash
Vals Multimodal Index62.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
IFBench76.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)74.3%60.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash
DTBench94.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMCA47.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Surface Evolver Bench58.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text1482Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1467Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1470Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision1308Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: English1481Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: non-English1475Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1527Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: German1494Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1486Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Korean1448Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: French1490Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1480Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Russian1493Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Polish1516Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1481Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1483Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1478Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1459Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: English1305Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1377Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1317Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: humor1321Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1301Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Document1463Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashNemotron 3.5 LightningLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash$0.0060Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning$0.0001Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash$0.102Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning$0.0031Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash$0.390Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning$0.012Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.5 Flash and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 3.5 FlashNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
MakerGoogleNVIDIA
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMay 19, 2026August 11, 2026
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$1.50$0.0534
Output $/Mtok$9.00$0.147
Coding index39.822.6
Independent measurements behind it42
Cost per solved task$1.21$0.06
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than Nemotron 3.5 Lightning for coding?

Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash for coding: it scores 39.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 22.6 for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning. Pick Nemotron 3.5 Lightning for output tokens 61.2x cheaper ($0.147 vs $9.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.06 against $1.21).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

Gemini 3.5 Flash costs $1.50 per million input tokens and $9.00 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs $0.0534 and $0.147. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Gemini 3.5 Flash costs $1.21 and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning $0.06.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

Gemini 3.5 Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning comparison based on?

17 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemini 3.5 Flash's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-vs-nvidia-nemotron-3-5-lightning" title="Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-vs-nvidia-nemotron-3-5-lightning">LLMBenchmark.ai, Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning</a></p>