Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads Gemini 3.5 Flash on coding, 49.0 to 39.8 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs 3.6x less per output token ($2.50 vs $9.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 82 benchmarks have a result for both.
Gemini 3.5 Flash or Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: which to pick
Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite for coding: it scores 49.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 39.8 for Gemini 3.5 Flash, though on 3 benchmarks against 4.
Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash for work measured by LMArena WebDev or LiveCodeBench (Vals AI), where it leads.
- Shared results
- 82
- Gemini 3.5 Flash only
- 30
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite only
- 3
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores 49.0 against 39.8.
4 and 3 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Gemini 3.5 Flash leads, 33.6 against 22.2.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has a AA Agentic Index result, 14.3.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Gemini 3.5 Flash leads, 92.7% against 83.8%.
Same board, both measured
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Gemini 3.5 Flash leads, 89.5% against 85.8%.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only Gemini 3.5 Flash has a Design Arena: websites result, 1267.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
No call
Both take 1.05M tokens.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Gemini 3.5 Flash $0.0060, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite $0.0015 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Gemini 3.5 Flash $1.21, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite $0.41.
Published attempt cost and pass rate
At a glance
- Coding index
- Gemini 3.5 Flash 39.8 from 4 benchmarks, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 49.0 from 3 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Math, 21.3 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- ARC-AGI-2: Gemini 3.5 Flash 72.1% against Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 10.3%, 61.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Gemini 3.5 Flash $9.00 against Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite $2.50 per million output tokens, 3.6x apart.
- Context window
- Both take 1.05M tokens.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Bars | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 14 | 0 | 1 tie | |
| Intelligence | 2 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 4 | 1 | ||
| Reasoning | 14 | 0 | ||
| Math | 6 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 9 | 2 | ||
| General | 28 | 1 | ||
| All shared boards | 77 | 4 | 1 tie |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index140
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1499 | 1435 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 49.3 | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 87.6% | 79.0% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 78.8% | 75.0% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 6.1% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 48.7% | 37.2% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 26.8% | 6.2% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 0.0% | 0.0% | Tie |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 74.2% | 50.2% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | 52.7% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 59.1% | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| SciCode | 53.9% | 41.3% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 46.2% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| WeirdML | 62.6% | 39.0% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| ALE-Bench | 911.0 | 765.3 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1493 | 1453 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1494 | 1451 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1495 | 1408 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1522 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1504 | 1448 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| SciCode | 12.3% | 6.2% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 33.6 | 22.2 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.9 | 144.9 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index41
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | Not measured | 14.3 | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | 1202 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | 1197 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1174 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Android apps | 1185 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Godot games | 1098 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: agents building games | 1180 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: HTML slides | 1093 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: PowerPoint slides | 1154 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 57.9% | 47.4% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 21.6% | 7.2% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 30.8% | 13.9% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 63.5% | 43.2% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 5.7% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 95.6% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| APEX-Agents | 27.5% | 29.3% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $5,396 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index140
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 92.7% | 83.8% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 88.3% | 83.6% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 92.2% | 83.8% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 42.7% | 18.8% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 92.8% | 83.3% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| ARC-AGI | 92.5% | 53.5% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 72.1% | 10.3% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| SimpleBench | 76.7% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Chess puzzles | 45.0% | 21.0% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| Mystery game puzzles | 32.0% | 19.0% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| EBR-bench | 4.8% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1488 | 1441 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1495 | 1434 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1483 | 1440 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1323 | 1284 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1330 | 1291 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 95.6% | 71.1% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 62.8% | 26.0% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 26.8% | 0.0% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| ProofBench | 31.0% | 13.0% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: math | 1504 | 1434 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1495 | 1433 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index92
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 89.5% | 85.8% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 83.6% | 84.1% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 64.7% | 60.7% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 74.4% | 72.6% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 68.1% | 68.7% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 55.8% | 43.5% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| SimpleQA Verified | 66.2% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1495 | 1451 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1483 | 1438 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1488 | 1431 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1467 | 1423 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| FACTS Benchmark Suite | 63.1% | 53.5% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1267 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1269 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1263 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1236 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1243 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1266 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1253 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1254 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index281
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 59.5% | 51.8% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 49.9% | 47.3% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 76.6% | 70.9% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| Vals Multimodal Index | 62.9% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| IFBench | 76.3% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 74.3% | 76.0% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| DTBench | 94.7% | 83.5% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMCA | 47.1% | 37.6% | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 58.1% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text | 1482 | 1435 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1467 | 1419 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1470 | 1421 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Vision | 1308 | 1269 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: English | 1481 | 1438 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1475 | 1427 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1527 | 1468 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: German | 1494 | 1454 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1486 | 1426 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1448 | 1407 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: French | 1490 | 1451 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1480 | 1441 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1493 | 1443 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1516 | 1437 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1481 | 1445 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1483 | 1435 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1478 | 1428 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1459 | 1414 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1305 | 1269 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1377 | 1311 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1317 | 1280 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1321 | 1287 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1301 | 1260 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| LMArena Document | 1463 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Google Gemini 3.5 Flash | Google Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | ||
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | May 19, 2026 | July 21, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $1.50 | $0.30 |
| Output $/Mtok | $9.00 | $2.50 |
| Coding index | 39.8 | 49.0 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 4 | 3 |
| Cost per solved task | $1.21 | $0.41 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite for coding?
Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite for coding: it scores 49.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 39.8 for Gemini 3.5 Flash, though on 3 benchmarks against 4. Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash for work measured by LMArena WebDev or LiveCodeBench (Vals AI), where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
Gemini 3.5 Flash costs $1.50 per million input tokens and $9.00 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs $0.30 and $2.50. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Gemini 3.5 Flash costs $1.21 and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite $0.41.
Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.
How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite comparison based on?
82 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemini 3.5 Flash's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.