Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads MiMo-V2.5-Pro on coding, 49.0 to 31.6 on the Vibe Coding Index, and MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs 2.7x less per output token ($0.9152 vs $2.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 57 benchmarks have a result for both.
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or MiMo-V2.5-Pro: which to pick
Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite for coding: it scores 49.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 31.6 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro, though on 3 benchmarks against 4.
Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro for output tokens 2.7x cheaper ($0.9152 vs $2.50 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.03 against $0.41).
- Shared results
- 57
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite only
- 28
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro only
- 13
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores 49.0 against 31.6.
3 and 4 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads, 26.0 against 22.2.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads, 21.3 against 14.3.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads, 83.8% against 82.6%.
Same board, both measured
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads, 85.8% against 84.6%.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro has a Design Arena: websites result, 1266.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro takes 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite $0.0015, MiMo-V2.5-Pro $0.0009 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite $0.41, MiMo-V2.5-Pro $0.03.
Published attempt cost and pass rate
At a glance
- Coding index
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 49.0 from 3 benchmarks, MiMo-V2.5-Pro 31.6 from 4 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Math, 8.8 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run): Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 18.8% against MiMo-V2.5-Pro 35.7%, 16.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite $2.50 against MiMo-V2.5-Pro $0.9152 per million output tokens, 2.7x apart.
- Context window
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite takes 1.05M tokens, MiMo-V2.5-Pro 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Bars | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 2 | 10 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 1 | ||
| Agentic work | 1 | 4 | ||
| Reasoning | 1 | 5 | ||
| Math | 0 | 3 | ||
| Knowledge | 3 | 6 | ||
| General | 2 | 19 | ||
| All shared boards | 9 | 48 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index210
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1435 | 1480 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| AA Coding Index | 49.3 | 60.2 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 79.0% | 81.3% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 75.0% | 74.0% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.5% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 37.2% | 34.1% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 6.2% | 21.6% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 0.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 50.2% | 57.3% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | 59.1% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| SciCode | 41.3% | 50.6% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 43.2% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| WeirdML | 39.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| ALE-Bench | 765.3 | 899.8 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1453 | 1501 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1451 | 1495 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1408 | 1469 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | Not measured | 1473 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1448 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| SciCode | 6.2% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 22.2 | 26.0 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.9 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 14.3 | 21.3 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 47.4% | 41.5% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 7.2% | 11.5% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 13.9% | 15.9% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 43.2% | 55.2% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | Not measured | 94.2% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| APEX-Agents | 29.3% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 83.8% | 82.6% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 83.6% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 83.8% | 86.6% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 18.8% | 35.7% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 83.3% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| ARC-AGI | 53.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 10.3% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| Chess puzzles | 21.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | 19.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1441 | 1486 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1434 | 1501 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1440 | 1494 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1284 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1291 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 71.1% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 26.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 0.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| ProofBench | 13.0% | 22.0% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: math | 1434 | 1481 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1433 | 1491 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index36
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 85.8% | 84.6% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 84.1% | 77.1% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 60.7% | 61.4% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 72.6% | 73.8% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 68.7% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 43.5% | 32.5% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: science | 1451 | 1482 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1438 | 1473 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1431 | 1474 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1423 | 1466 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| FACTS Benchmark Suite | 53.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | Not measured | 1266 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | Not measured | 1246 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | Not measured | 1261 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1257 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | Not measured | 1243 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | Not measured | 1265 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | Not measured | 1181 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | Not measured | 1156 | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index219
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 51.8% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 47.3% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 70.9% | 83.7% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| IFBench | Not measured | 79.9% | Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 76.0% | 79.7% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| DTBench | 83.5% | 84.5% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMCA | 37.6% | 29.5% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text | 1435 | 1464 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1419 | 1475 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1421 | 1438 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Vision | 1269 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1438 | 1477 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1427 | 1448 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1468 | 1507 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: German | 1454 | 1459 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1426 | 1410 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1407 | 1435 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: French | 1451 | 1487 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1441 | 1469 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1443 | 1449 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1437 | 1464 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1445 | 1476 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1435 | 1481 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1428 | 1451 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1414 | 1438 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1269 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1311 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1280 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1287 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1260 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Google Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Xiaomi | |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | July 21, 2026 | April 22, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.30 | $0.4575 |
| Output $/Mtok | $2.50 | $0.9152 |
| Coding index | 49.0 | 31.6 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 3 | 4 |
| Cost per solved task | $0.41 | $0.03 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro for coding?
Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite for coding: it scores 49.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 31.6 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro, though on 3 benchmarks against 4. Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro for output tokens 2.7x cheaper ($0.9152 vs $2.50 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.03 against $0.41).
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs $0.4575 and $0.9152. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs $0.41 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro $0.03.
Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.
How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro comparison based on?
57 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and MiMo-V2.5-Pro's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.