Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen3 Coder Next

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads Qwen3 Coder Next on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 22.2 to 9.2, and Qwen3 Coder Next costs 3.1x less per output token ($0.80 vs $2.50 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 8 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogle
Coding
49.0
Overall
22.2
Output $/M
$2.50
8
Qwen3 Coder NextQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
9.2
Output $/M
$0.80
0
vs boards won of 8 shared

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Qwen3 Coder Next: which to pick

Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has a coding score, 49.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 Coder Next has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3 Coder Next for output tokens 3.1x cheaper ($0.80 vs $2.50 per million).

Shared results
8
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite only
75
Qwen3 Coder Next only
3
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 49.0 from 3 benchmarks, Qwen3 Coder Next not benchmarked.
Widest category
General, 29.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 76.0% against Qwen3 Coder Next 47.0%, 29.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite $2.50 against Qwen3 Coder Next $0.80 per million output tokens, 3.1x apart.
Context window
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3 Coder Next 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 3.5 Flash LiteBarsQwen3 Coder NextTies
Coding30
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning20
General10
All shared boards80
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index30
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 Coder Next
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen3 Coder NextLeader
LMArena WebDev1435Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
AA Coding Index49.336.2Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)79.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)75.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)37.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Code migration (Vals AI)6.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)50.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)59.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
SciCode41.3%36.2%Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured18.2%Only Qwen3 Coder Next measured
WeirdML39.0%34.4%Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
ALE-Bench765.3Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: coding1453Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1451Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena WebDev: React1408Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1448Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 Coder Next
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen3 Coder NextLeader
AA Intelligence Index22.29.2Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Epoch Capabilities Index144.9Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 Coder Next
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen3 Coder NextLeader
AA Agentic Index14.30.9Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Finance Agent (Vals AI)47.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)7.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)13.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)43.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured79.5%Only Qwen3 Coder Next measured
APEX-Agents29.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 Coder Next
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen3 Coder NextLeader
GPQA Diamond83.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)83.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)83.8%73.7%Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)18.8%10.1%Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)83.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ARC-AGI53.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ARC-AGI-210.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Chess puzzles21.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Mystery game puzzles19.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1441Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: expert1434Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1440Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1284Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: homework1291Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 Coder Next
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen3 Coder NextLeader
OTIS Mock AIME71.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 326.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
FrontierMath, tier 40.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ProofBench13.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: math1434Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1433Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 Coder Next
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen3 Coder NextLeader
MMLU Pro85.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)84.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)60.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)72.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MedCode (Vals AI)43.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: science1451Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1438Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1431Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1423Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 Coder Next
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen3 Coder NextLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 Coder Next
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen3 Coder NextLeader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)51.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
SAGE (Vals AI)47.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)70.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
IFBenchNot measured35.2%Only Qwen3 Coder Next measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)76.0%47.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
DTBench83.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMCA37.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text1435Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1419Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1421Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision1269Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: English1438Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: non-English1427Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1468Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: German1454Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1426Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: Korean1407Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: French1451Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1441Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: Russian1443Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: Polish1437Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1445Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1435Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1428Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1414Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: English1269Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1311Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1280Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: humor1287Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1260Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 Coder Next
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen3 Coder NextLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite$0.0015Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder Next$0.0005Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder Next costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite$0.022Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder Next$0.0084Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder Next costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite$0.085Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder Next$0.032Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder Next costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 Coder Next
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen3 Coder Next
MakerGoogleQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 21, 2026February 4, 2026
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.30$0.12
Output $/Mtok$2.50$0.80
Coding index49.0Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it30
Cost per solved task$0.41Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than Qwen3 Coder Next for coding?

Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has a coding score, 49.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 Coder Next has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 Coder Next for output tokens 3.1x cheaper ($0.80 vs $2.50 per million).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder Next costs $0.12 and $0.80. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen3 Coder Next comparison based on?

8 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 Coder Next's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next