Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 22.2 to 12.7, and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs 1.4x less per output token ($2.50 vs $3.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 36 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Replace Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogle
Coding
49.0
Overall
49.8
Output $/M
$2.50
30
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
52.9
Output $/M
$3.50
6
vs boards won of 36 shared

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: which to pick

Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has a coding score, 49.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 for work measured by WeirdML or LMArena Text: expert, where it leads.

Model AGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogle49.0/1003 independent benchmarks$0.41 per solved taskModel BQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507QwenNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task
Shared results
36
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite only
49
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 only
10
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 49.0 from 3 benchmarks, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 13.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Coding Index: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 49.3 against Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 22.1, 27.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite $2.50 against Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 $3.50 per million output tokens, 1.4x apart.
Context window
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 3.5 Flash LiteBarsQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Ties
Coding31
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning41
Math12
Knowledge31
General171
All shared boards306
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index31
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
LMArena WebDev1435Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
AA Coding Index49.322.1Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)79.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)75.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)37.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Code migration (Vals AI)6.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)50.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)59.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
SciCode41.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
WeirdML39.0%41.0%Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
ALE-Bench765.3Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: coding14531424Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: software and IT14511431Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena WebDev: React1408Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1448Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
SciCode6.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
AA Intelligence Index22.212.7Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Epoch Capabilities Index144.9Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
AA Agentic Index14.31.3Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Finance Agent (Vals AI)47.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)7.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)13.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)43.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
APEX-Agents29.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured-$11Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index41
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
GPQA Diamond83.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)83.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)83.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)18.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)83.3%80.1%Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
ARC-AGI53.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ARC-AGI-210.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Chess puzzles21.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Mystery game puzzles19.0%9.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: hard prompts14411416Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: expert14341463Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14401432Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Vision: diagrams1284Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: homework1291Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12
Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
OTIS Mock AIME71.1%86.7%Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 326.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
FrontierMath, tier 40.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ProofBench13.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: math14341412Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: mathematical work14331435Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index31
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
MMLU Pro85.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)84.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)60.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)72.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MedCode (Vals AI)43.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured40.4%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: science14511433Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14381456Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: legal and government14311415Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: business and finance14231413Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
FACTS Benchmark Suite53.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1052Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured942Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured956Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured950Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured997Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1032Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index171
General benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)51.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
SAGE (Vals AI)47.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)70.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)76.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
DTBench83.5%80.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMCA37.6%29.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured75.0%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured82.4%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text14351415Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: instruction following14191386Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: creative writing14211384Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Vision1269Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: English14381429Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: non-English14271397Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: Chinese14681481Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: German14541408Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: Japanese14261386Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: Korean14071375Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: French1451Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: Spanish14411389Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: Russian14431401Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: Polish14371390Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: multi-turn14451406Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: longer queries14351400Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: writing and language14281388Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14141370Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Vision: English1269Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1311Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1280Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: humor1287Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1260Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite$0.0015Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.0022Fits in one request

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite$0.022Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.033Fits in one request

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite$0.085Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.125Exceeds the context window

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
MakerGoogleQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 21, 2026July 25, 2025
Context window1.05M128K
Input $/Mtok$0.30$0.45
Output $/Mtok$2.50$3.50
Coding index49.0Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it30
Cost per solved task$0.41Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 for coding?

Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has a coding score, 49.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 for work measured by WeirdML or LMArena Text: expert, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs $0.45 and $3.50. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 comparison based on?

36 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next