Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Grok 4.3
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads Grok 4.3 on coding, 49.0 to 37.4 on the Vibe Coding Index, at about the same output price ($2.50 vs $2.50 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 77 benchmarks have a result for both.
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Grok 4.3: which to pick
Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite for coding: it scores 49.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 37.4 for Grok 4.3.
Pick Grok 4.3 for a lower cost per solved task ($0.31 against $0.41) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) or Code migration (Vals AI), where it leads.
- Shared results
- 77
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite only
- 8
- Grok 4.3 only
- 27
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores 49.0 against 37.4.
3 benchmarks behind each score
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 leads, 24.9 against 22.2.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 leads, 15.5 against 14.3.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 leads, 91.4% against 83.8%.
Same board, both measured
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Tied at 85.8%.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only Grok 4.3 has a Design Arena: websites result, 1196.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite takes 1.05M tokens against 1M.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite $0.0015, Grok 4.3 $0.0025 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
Grok 4.3
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite $0.41, Grok 4.3 $0.31.
Published attempt cost and pass rate
At a glance
- Coding index
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 49.0 from 3 benchmarks, Grok 4.3 37.4 from 3 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Math, 11.6 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- SAGE (Vals AI): Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 47.3% against Grok 4.3 19.7%, 27.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Both cost $2.50 per million output tokens.
- Context window
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite takes 1.05M tokens, Grok 4.3 1M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Bars | Grok 4.3 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 9 | 5 | 1 tie | |
| Intelligence | 0 | 1 | ||
| Agentic work | 3 | 2 | ||
| Reasoning | 7 | 4 | ||
| Math | 3 | 3 | ||
| Knowledge | 7 | 2 | 1 tie | |
| General | 26 | 3 | ||
| All shared boards | 55 | 20 | 2 ties |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index95
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Grok 4.3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1435 | 1358 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| AA Coding Index | 49.3 | 42.2 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 79.0% | 84.5% | Grok 4.3 |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 75.0% | 71.4% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 37.2% | 19.4% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 6.2% | 6.8% | Grok 4.3 |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 0.0% | 0.0% | Tie |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 50.2% | 42.0% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 40.6% | Only Grok 4.3 measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | 59.1% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| SciCode | 41.3% | 48.3% | Grok 4.3 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 37.9% | Only Grok 4.3 measured |
| WeirdML | 39.0% | 49.9% | Grok 4.3 |
| ALE-Bench | 765.3 | 944.2 | Grok 4.3 |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1453 | 1415 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1451 | 1416 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1408 | 1353 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | Not measured | 1367 | Only Grok 4.3 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1448 | 1375 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| SciCode | 6.2% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Grok 4.3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 22.2 | 24.9 | Grok 4.3 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.9 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index32
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Grok 4.3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 14.3 | 15.5 | Grok 4.3 |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | Not measured | 1126 | Only Grok 4.3 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | Not measured | 1006 | Only Grok 4.3 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | Not measured | 1059 | Only Grok 4.3 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Android apps | Not measured | 961 | Only Grok 4.3 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Godot games | Not measured | 914 | Only Grok 4.3 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building games | Not measured | 1007 | Only Grok 4.3 measured |
| Design Arena: HTML slides | Not measured | 1008 | Only Grok 4.3 measured |
| Design Arena: PowerPoint slides | Not measured | 1013 | Only Grok 4.3 measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 47.4% | 37.7% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 7.2% | 6.2% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 13.9% | 15.4% | Grok 4.3 |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 43.2% | 18.4% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | Not measured | 97.7% | Only Grok 4.3 measured |
| APEX-Agents | 29.3% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | Not measured | $35 | Only Grok 4.3 measured |
| LMArena Search | Not measured | 1166 | Only Grok 4.3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index74
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Grok 4.3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 83.8% | 91.4% | Grok 4.3 |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 83.6% | 83.1% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 83.8% | 90.1% | Grok 4.3 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 18.8% | 37.2% | Grok 4.3 |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 83.3% | 88.8% | Grok 4.3 |
| ARC-AGI | 53.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 10.3% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| Chess puzzles | 21.0% | 18.0% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| Mystery game puzzles | 19.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1441 | 1396 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1434 | 1384 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1440 | 1402 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1284 | 1241 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1291 | 1241 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index33
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Grok 4.3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 71.1% | 93.3% | Grok 4.3 |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 26.0% | 42.8% | Grok 4.3 |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 0.0% | 14.6% | Grok 4.3 |
| ProofBench | 13.0% | 11.0% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: math | 1434 | 1387 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1433 | 1396 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index72
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Grok 4.3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 85.8% | 85.8% | Tie |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 84.1% | 84.5% | Grok 4.3 |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | Not measured | 79.3% | Only Grok 4.3 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 60.7% | 68.5% | Grok 4.3 |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 72.6% | 70.8% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 68.7% | 48.3% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 43.5% | 38.1% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| SimpleQA Verified | Not measured | 33.2% | Only Grok 4.3 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1451 | 1399 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1438 | 1384 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1431 | 1386 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1423 | 1381 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| FACTS Benchmark Suite | 53.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Grok 4.3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | Not measured | 1196 | Only Grok 4.3 measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | Not measured | 1192 | Only Grok 4.3 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | Not measured | 1174 | Only Grok 4.3 measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1179 | Only Grok 4.3 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | Not measured | 1125 | Only Grok 4.3 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | Not measured | 1187 | Only Grok 4.3 measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | Not measured | 1081 | Only Grok 4.3 measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | Not measured | 1125 | Only Grok 4.3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index263
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Grok 4.3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 51.8% | 51.7% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 47.3% | 19.7% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 70.9% | 74.4% | Grok 4.3 |
| Vals Multimodal Index | Not measured | 43.3% | Only Grok 4.3 measured |
| IFBench | Not measured | 83.3% | Only Grok 4.3 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 76.0% | 75.0% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| DTBench | 83.5% | 90.7% | Grok 4.3 |
| LMCA | 37.6% | 38.3% | Grok 4.3 |
| LMArena Text | 1435 | 1397 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1419 | 1366 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1421 | 1380 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Vision | 1269 | 1229 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: English | 1438 | 1404 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1427 | 1385 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1468 | 1422 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: German | 1454 | 1395 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1426 | 1379 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1407 | 1354 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: French | 1451 | 1411 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1441 | 1399 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1443 | 1399 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1437 | 1398 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1445 | 1406 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1435 | 1393 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1428 | 1385 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1414 | 1370 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1269 | 1235 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1311 | 1257 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1280 | 1235 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1287 | 1222 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | Not measured | 1217 | Only Grok 4.3 measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1260 | 1237 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Grok 4.3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Google Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | SpaceXAI Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | xAI | |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | July 21, 2026 | April 30, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.30 | $1.25 |
| Output $/Mtok | $2.50 | $2.50 |
| Coding index | 49.0 | 37.4 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 3 | 3 |
| Cost per solved task | $0.41 | $0.31 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than Grok 4.3 for coding?
Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite for coding: it scores 49.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 37.4 for Grok 4.3. Pick Grok 4.3 for a lower cost per solved task ($0.31 against $0.41) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) or Code migration (Vals AI), where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Grok 4.3?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Grok 4.3 costs $1.25 and $2.50. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs $0.41 and Grok 4.3 $0.31.
Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Grok 4.3?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Grok 4.3 comparison based on?
77 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Grok 4.3's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.