Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs GPT-5.4 Mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads GPT-5.4 Mini on coding, 49.0 to 35.8 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs 1.8x less per output token ($2.50 vs $4.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 76 benchmarks have a result for both.
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or GPT-5.4 Mini: which to pick
Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite for coding: it scores 49.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 35.8 for GPT-5.4 Mini, though on 3 benchmarks against 5.
Pick GPT-5.4 Mini for work measured by AA Coding Index or LiveCodeBench (Vals AI), where it leads.
- Shared results
- 76
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite only
- 9
- GPT-5.4 Mini only
- 13
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores 49.0 against 35.8.
3 and 5 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
GPT-5.4 Mini
GPT-5.4 Mini leads, 24.1 against 22.2.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
GPT-5.4 Mini
GPT-5.4 Mini leads, 17.9 against 14.3.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads, 83.8% against 83.1%.
Same board, both measured
Math
AIME
No call
Only GPT-5.4 Mini has a AIME result, 95.6%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads, 85.8% against 84.5%.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite takes 1.05M tokens against 400K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite $0.0015, GPT-5.4 Mini $0.0030 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite $0.41, GPT-5.4 Mini $0.70.
Published attempt cost and pass rate
At a glance
- Coding index
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 49.0 from 3 benchmarks, GPT-5.4 Mini 35.8 from 5 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Math, 10.7 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 26.0% against GPT-5.4 Mini 51.2%, 25.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite $2.50 against GPT-5.4 Mini $4.50 per million output tokens, 1.8x apart.
- Context window
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite takes 1.05M tokens, GPT-5.4 Mini 400K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Bars | GPT-5.4 Mini | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 5 | 8 | 1 tie | |
| Intelligence | 0 | 2 | ||
| Agentic work | 2 | 3 | ||
| Reasoning | 7 | 7 | ||
| Math | 2 | 4 | ||
| Knowledge | 7 | 1 | ||
| General | 24 | 3 | ||
| All shared boards | 47 | 28 | 1 tie |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index58
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GPT-5.4 Mini | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1435 | 1397 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| AA Coding Index | 49.3 | 56.1 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 79.0% | 81.5% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 75.0% | 73.0% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 2.5% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 37.2% | 48.0% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 6.2% | 12.9% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 0.0% | 0.0% | Tie |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 50.2% | 54.7% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | 59.1% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| SciCode | 41.3% | 52.1% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 52.3% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| FrontierCode | Not measured | 27.0% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| WeirdML | 39.0% | 60.3% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| ALE-Bench | 765.3 | 1188.6 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1453 | 1438 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1451 | 1436 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1408 | 1386 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | Not measured | 1419 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1448 | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| SciCode | 6.2% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GPT-5.4 Mini | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 22.2 | 24.1 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.9 | 148.7 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index23
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GPT-5.4 Mini | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 14.3 | 17.9 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 47.4% | 45.4% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 7.2% | 8.8% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 13.9% | 12.5% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 43.2% | 45.4% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | Not measured | 83.3% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| APEX-Agents | 29.3% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| DeepResearch Bench | Not measured | 36.3% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index77
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GPT-5.4 Mini | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 83.8% | 83.1% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 83.6% | 79.3% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 83.8% | 87.5% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 18.8% | 28.1% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 83.3% | 86.9% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| ARC-AGI | 53.5% | 63.7% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 10.3% | 18.9% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| Chess puzzles | 21.0% | 23.0% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| Mystery game puzzles | 19.0% | 11.0% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1441 | 1424 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1434 | 1435 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1440 | 1420 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1284 | 1266 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1291 | 1285 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | Not measured | 37.9% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index24
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GPT-5.4 Mini | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | Not measured | 95.6% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 71.1% | 88.9% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 26.0% | 51.2% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 0.0% | 9.8% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| ProofBench | 13.0% | 21.0% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text: math | 1434 | 1418 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1433 | 1429 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index71
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GPT-5.4 Mini | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 85.8% | 84.5% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 84.1% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | Not measured | 51.7% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 60.7% | 60.9% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 72.6% | 71.2% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 68.7% | 63.5% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 43.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | Not measured | 29.4% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1451 | 1417 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1438 | 1395 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1431 | 1414 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1423 | 1418 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| FACTS Benchmark Suite | 53.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GPT-5.4 Mini | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 9 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index243
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GPT-5.4 Mini | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 51.8% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 47.3% | 50.8% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 70.9% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured |
| Vals Multimodal Index | Not measured | 54.2% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| IFBench | Not measured | 73.3% | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 76.0% | 77.0% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| DTBench | 83.5% | 80.0% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMCA | 37.6% | 40.8% | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| LMArena Text | 1435 | 1412 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1419 | 1405 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1421 | 1370 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Vision | 1269 | 1245 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: English | 1438 | 1412 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1427 | 1405 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1468 | 1446 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: German | 1454 | 1408 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1426 | 1375 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1407 | 1370 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: French | 1451 | 1441 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1441 | 1405 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1443 | 1417 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1437 | 1415 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1445 | 1429 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1435 | 1408 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1428 | 1393 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1414 | 1373 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1269 | 1244 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1311 | 1286 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1280 | 1253 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1287 | 1235 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | Not measured | 1218 | Only GPT-5.4 Mini measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1260 | 1222 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
| Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GPT-5.4 Mini | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Google Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | OpenAI GPT-5.4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | OpenAI | |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | July 21, 2026 | March 17, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 400K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.30 | $0.75 |
| Output $/Mtok | $2.50 | $4.50 |
| Coding index | 49.0 | 35.8 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 3 | 5 |
| Cost per solved task | $0.41 | $0.70 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than GPT-5.4 Mini for coding?
Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite for coding: it scores 49.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 35.8 for GPT-5.4 Mini, though on 3 benchmarks against 5. Pick GPT-5.4 Mini for work measured by AA Coding Index or LiveCodeBench (Vals AI), where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or GPT-5.4 Mini?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 Mini costs $0.75 and $4.50. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs $0.41 and GPT-5.4 Mini $0.70.
Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or GPT-5.4 Mini?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite, with 1.05M tokens against 400K.
How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs GPT-5.4 Mini comparison based on?
76 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and GPT-5.4 Mini's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.