Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 22.2 to 20.4, and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini costs 1.3x less per output token ($2.00 vs $2.50 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 5 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogle
Coding
49.0
Overall
49.8
Output $/M
$2.50
5
GPT-5.1-Codex-MiniOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
0
vs boards won of 5 shared

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini: which to pick

Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has a coding score, 49.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini for output tokens 1.3x cheaper ($2.00 vs $2.50 per million).

Shared results
5
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite only
80
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini only
17
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 49.0 from 3 benchmarks, GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 27.3 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 1435 against GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini 1244, 27.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite $2.50 against GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini $2.00 per million output tokens, 1.3x apart.
Context window
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite takes 1.05M tokens, GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini 400K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 3.5 Flash LiteBarsGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniTies
Coding10
Intelligence10
Reasoning20
General10
All shared boards50
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
LMArena WebDev14351244Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
AA Coding Index49.3Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)79.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)75.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)37.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Code migration (Vals AI)6.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)50.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)59.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured83.6%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
SciCode41.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured33.3%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured61.6%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
WeirdML39.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ALE-Bench765.3Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: coding1453Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1451Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena WebDev: React1408Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1253Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1448Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
SciCode6.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
AA Intelligence Index22.220.4Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Epoch Capabilities Index144.9Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
AA Agentic Index14.3Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)47.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)7.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)13.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)43.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured62.9%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
APEX-Agents29.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
GPQA Diamond83.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)83.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)83.8%81.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)18.8%18.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)83.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ARC-AGI53.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ARC-AGI-210.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Chess puzzles21.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Mystery game puzzles19.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1441Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: expert1434Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1440Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1284Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: homework1291Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured91.7Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured91.7%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
OTIS Mock AIME71.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 326.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
FrontierMath, tier 40.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ProofBench13.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: math1434Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1433Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
MMLU Pro85.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)84.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)60.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)72.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MedCode (Vals AI)43.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured82.0%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
LMArena Text: science1451Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1438Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1431Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1423Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
FACTS Benchmark Suite53.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1111Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1081Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1092Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1097Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured988Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1094Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured978Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1105Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)51.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
SAGE (Vals AI)47.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)70.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
IFBenchNot measured67.9%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)76.0%66.7%Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
DTBench83.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMCA37.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text1435Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1419Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1421Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision1269Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: English1438Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: non-English1427Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1468Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: German1454Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1426Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: Korean1407Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: French1451Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1441Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: Russian1443Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: Polish1437Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1445Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1435Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1428Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1414Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: English1269Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1311Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1280Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: humor1287Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1260Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite$0.0015Fits in one request
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini$0.0013Fits in one request

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite$0.022Fits in one request
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini$0.018Fits in one request

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite$0.085Fits in one request
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini$0.070Fits in one request

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteOpenAI GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
MakerGoogleOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 21, 2026November 13, 2025
Context window1.05M400K
Input $/Mtok$0.30$0.25
Output $/Mtok$2.50$2.00
Coding index49.0Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it31
Cost per solved task$0.41Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini for coding?

Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has a coding score, 49.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini for output tokens 1.3x cheaper ($2.00 vs $2.50 per million).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini costs $0.25 and $2.00. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite, with 1.05M tokens against 400K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini comparison based on?

5 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next