Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Ling 3.0 Flash

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads Ling 3.0 Flash on coding, 32.3 to 29.6 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Ling 3.0 Flash costs 98.8x less per output token ($0.1215 vs $12.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 23 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle
Coding
32.3
Overall
54.0
Output $/M
$12.00
21
Ling 3.0 FlashinclusionAI
Coding
29.6
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.1215
2
vs boards won of 23 shared

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Ling 3.0 Flash: which to pick

Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview for coding: it scores 32.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 29.6 for Ling 3.0 Flash.

Pick Ling 3.0 Flash for output tokens 98.8x cheaper ($0.1215 vs $12.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.05 against $0.99).

Shared results
23
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview only
114
Ling 3.0 Flash only
1
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 32.3 from 4 benchmarks, Ling 3.0 Flash 29.6 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 18.0 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 32.0% against Ling 3.0 Flash 2.9%, 29.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview $12.00 against Ling 3.0 Flash $0.1215 per million output tokens, 98.8x apart.
Context window
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview takes 1.05M tokens, Ling 3.0 Flash 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewBarsLing 3.0 FlashTies
Coding70
Intelligence10
Agentic work31
Reasoning30
Knowledge50
General21
All shared boards212
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index70
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Ling 3.0 Flash
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewLing 3.0 FlashLeader
LMArena WebDev1447Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
AA Coding Index68.850.6Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)88.5%84.0%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)78.8%65.2%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)2.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)32.0%2.9%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Code migration (Vals AI)17.3%0.0%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
IOI (Vals AI)51.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)70.8%50.2%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)6.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured27.9%Only Ling 3.0 Flash measured
SciCode58.7%42.0%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)53.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Terminal-Bench80.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
GSO-Bench22.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
WeirdML72.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MirrorCode8.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ALE-Bench1160.6Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: coding1484Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1487Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: React1438Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1490Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1481Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SciCode14.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Ling 3.0 Flash
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewLing 3.0 FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index29.720.1Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index31
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Ling 3.0 Flash
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewLing 3.0 FlashLeader
AA Agentic Index8.219.3Ling 3.0 Flash
Design Arena: agents building web apps1125Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1068Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1093Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1049Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1236Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building games1113Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1092Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1040Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SREBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)43.0%30.3%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)9.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)20.7%0.0%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)52.6%25.0%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)60.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)1.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vals Science Index27.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
τ²-Bench Telecom95.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
APEX-Agents35.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
METR time horizons77.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
BALROG57.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
DeepResearch Bench47.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
PostTrainBench22.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vending-Bench 2$911Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MCP Atlas78.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Ling 3.0 Flash
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewLing 3.0 FlashLeader
GPQA Diamond95.5%84.8%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)20.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)88.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)94.1%85.5%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)47.0%23.7%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)94.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ARC-AGI98.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ARC-AGI-277.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SimpleBench79.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Chess puzzles51.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Mystery game puzzles34.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
EBR-bench14.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1485Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: expert1483Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1480Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1311Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: homework1316Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Ling 3.0 Flash
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewLing 3.0 FlashLeader
AIME98.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
OTIS Mock AIME95.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 359.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
FrontierMath, tier 426.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ProofBench26.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: math1486Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1478Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MathArena30.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Ling 3.0 Flash
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewLing 3.0 FlashLeader
MMLU Pro91.0%82.0%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LegalBench (Vals AI)87.4%79.7%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
CaseLaw (Vals AI)64.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)64.5%61.9%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
TaxEval (Vals AI)72.9%70.7%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
MortgageTax (Vals AI)69.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MedQA (Vals AI)96.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MedCode (Vals AI)59.1%32.3%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
SimpleQA Verified73.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: science1497Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1486Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1487Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1459Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
FACTS Benchmark Suite67.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Ling 3.0 Flash
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewLing 3.0 FlashLeader
Design Arena: websites1234Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: UI components1224Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: game dev1202Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: data viz1209Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: 3D1234Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: all code categories1230Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: SVG1284Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1270Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21
General benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Ling 3.0 Flash
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewLing 3.0 FlashLeader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)53.8%50.7%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
SAGE (Vals AI)48.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)76.1%80.9%Ling 3.0 Flash
Vals Multimodal Index56.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
IFBench77.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.0%73.0%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
DTBench97.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMCA53.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
CL-bench20.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Furniture assembly26.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ExploitBench26.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
CL-bench Life16.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text1480Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1466Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1482Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision1296Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: English1478Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: non-English1476Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1527Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: German1490Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1491Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: Korean1455Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: French1487Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1481Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: Russian1497Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: Polish1498Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1487Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1482Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1481Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1465Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: English1287Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1364Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1304Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: humor1322Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1345Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1330Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1324Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Document1444Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MultiChallenge71.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
EQ-Bench 41142Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Ling 3.0 Flash
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewLing 3.0 FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$0.0080Fits in one request
Ling 3.0 Flash$0.0001Fits in one request

Ling 3.0 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$0.136Fits in one request
Ling 3.0 Flash$0.0024Fits in one request

Ling 3.0 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$0.520Fits in one request
Ling 3.0 Flash$0.0093Fits in one request

Ling 3.0 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Ling 3.0 Flash
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewinclusionAI Ling 3.0 Flash
MakerGoogleinclusionAI
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedFebruary 19, 2026July 23, 2026
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.0405
Output $/Mtok$12.00$0.1215
Coding index32.329.6
Independent measurements behind it42
Cost per solved task$0.99$0.05
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better than Ling 3.0 Flash for coding?

Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview for coding: it scores 32.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 29.6 for Ling 3.0 Flash. Pick Ling 3.0 Flash for output tokens 98.8x cheaper ($0.1215 vs $12.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.05 against $0.99).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Ling 3.0 Flash?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $12.00 per million output tokens; Ling 3.0 Flash costs $0.0405 and $0.1215. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview costs $0.99 and Ling 3.0 Flash $0.05.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Ling 3.0 Flash?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Ling 3.0 Flash comparison based on?

23 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Ling 3.0 Flash's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview-vs-inclusionai-ling-3-0-flash" title="Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Ling 3.0 Flash, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview-vs-inclusionai-ling-3-0-flash">LLMBenchmark.ai, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Ling 3.0 Flash</a></p>