LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)

Updated October 21, 2026. 40 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle
Coding
35.3
Overall
29.7
Output $/M
$12.00
40
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)OpenAI
Coding
3.6
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
0
vs boards won of 40 shared

Decision reading

Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview for coding: it scores 35.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 3.6 for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18).

Pick GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) when output tokens cost 20.0x less.

Shared results
40
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview only
91
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) only
6
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 35.3 from 1 benchmark, GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) 3.6 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Math, 54.6 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 95.6% against GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) 6.9%, 88.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview $12.00 against GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) $0.60 per million output tokens, 20.0x apart.
Context window
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview takes 1.05M tokens, GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewBarsGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Ties
Coding30
Agentic work10
Reasoning70
Math40
Knowledge50
General200
All shared boards400
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index30
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
Aider polyglotNot measured3.6%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena WebDev1447Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
AA Coding Index68.8Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)88.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)78.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)2.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)32.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Code migration (Vals AI)17.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
IOI (Vals AI)51.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)70.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)6.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SciCode58.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)53.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Terminal-Bench80.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
GSO-Bench22.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
WeirdML72.1%11.8%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
MirrorCode8.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ALE-Bench1160.6Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: coding14841290Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: software and IT14871291Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena WebDev: React1438Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1490Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1481Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
AA Intelligence Index29.7Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
AA Agentic Index8.2Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1125Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1068Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1094Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1055Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1236Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building games1114Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1153Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1064Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SREBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)43.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)9.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)20.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)52.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)60.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)1.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vals Science Index27.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
τ²-Bench Telecom95.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
APEX-Agents35.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
METR time horizons77.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
BALROG57.0%17.4%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
DeepResearch Bench47.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
PostTrainBench22.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vending-Bench 2$911Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index70
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
GPQA Diamond95.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)20.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)88.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)94.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)47.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)94.4%37.7%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
ARC-AGI98.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ARC-AGI-277.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SimpleBench79.6%10.7%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Chess puzzles51.0%3.0%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Mystery game puzzles34.0%12.0%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
EBR-bench14.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
VPCTNot measured34.0%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14851267Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: expert14831234Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14801278Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Vision: diagrams1311Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: homework1316Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
AIME98.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
OTIS Mock AIME95.6%6.9%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 359.6%0.7%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
FrontierMath, tier 426.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ProofBench26.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MATH level 5Not measured52.6%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: math14861267Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: mathematical work14781271Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
MMLU Pro91.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)87.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)64.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)64.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)72.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)69.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MedQA (Vals AI)96.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MedCode (Vals AI)59.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SimpleQA Verified73.5%8.3%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
MMLUNot measured76.7%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
GeoBenchNot measured64.0%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: science14971286Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14861282Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: legal and government14871305Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: business and finance14591265Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
Design Arena: websites1234Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: UI components1226Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: game dev1203Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: data viz1209Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: 3D1234Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: all code categories1231Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: SVG1285Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1270Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index200
General benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)53.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SAGE (Vals AI)48.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)76.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vals Multimodal Index56.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
IFBench77.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
DTBench97.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMCA53.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured67.2%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
CL-bench20.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Furniture assembly26.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ExploitBench26.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
CL-bench Life16.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text14801286Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: instruction following14661258Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: creative writing14821268Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Vision12961066Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: English14781301Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: non-English14761266Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: Chinese15271265Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: German14901272Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: Japanese14911216Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: Korean14551195Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: French14871297Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: Spanish14811276Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: Russian14971275Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: Polish14981244Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: multi-turn14871285Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: longer queries14821289Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: writing and language14811282Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14651253Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Vision: English12871072Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Vision: Chinese13641033Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena Vision: reading text1304Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: humor1322Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1345Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1330Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1324Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Document1444Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$0.0080Fits in one request
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.0004Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$0.136Fits in one request
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.0093Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$0.520Fits in one request
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.036Exceeds the context window

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewOpenAI GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
MakerGoogleOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedFebruary 19, 2026July 18, 2024
Context window1.05M128K
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.15
Output $/Mtok$12.00$0.60
Coding index35.33.6
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved task$0.99Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better than GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) for coding?

Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview for coding: it scores 35.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 3.6 for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18). Pick GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) when output tokens cost 20.0x less.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $12.00 per million output tokens; GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs $0.15 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) comparison based on?

40 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)'s on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next