Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Kimi K2.5
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs 1.9x less per output token than Kimi K2.5 ($1.50 vs $2.85 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 9 benchmarks have a result for both.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Kimi K2.5: which to pick
Only Kimi K2.5 has a coding score, 38.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite for output tokens 1.9x cheaper ($1.50 vs $2.85 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens).
- Shared results
- 9
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite only
- 7
- Kimi K2.5 only
- 90
- Like-for-like categories
- 5 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only Kimi K2.5 has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only Kimi K2.5 has a AA Intelligence Index result, 23.5.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only Kimi K2.5 has a GPQA Diamond result, 84.1%.
Directional only
Math
AIME
No call
Only Kimi K2.5 has a AIME result, 95.6%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only Kimi K2.5 has a MMLU Pro result, 85.9%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only Kimi K2.5 has a Design Arena: websites result, 1248.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite takes 1.05M tokens against 262K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite $0.0010, Kimi K2.5 $0.0020 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Kimi K2.5 has the number, $0.24.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite not benchmarked, Kimi K2.5 38.6 from 3 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Agentic work, 64.6 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
- Widest single gap
- τ²-Bench Telecom: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 31.3% against Kimi K2.5 95.9%, 64.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite $1.50 against Kimi K2.5 $2.85 per million output tokens, 1.9x apart.
- Context window
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite takes 1.05M tokens, Kimi K2.5 262K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Bars | Kimi K2.5 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 1 | 1 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 1 | ||
| Agentic work | 0 | 1 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 3 | ||
| General | 1 | 1 | ||
| All shared boards | 2 | 7 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index11
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Kimi K2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | Not measured | 70.8% | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | Not measured | 67.3% | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| LMArena WebDev | Not measured | 1437 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 46.8 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 83.9% | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | Not measured | 70.0% | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 17.5% | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | Not measured | 7.0% | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 42.0% | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| SciCode | 43.4% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 24.2% | 34.8% | Kimi K2.5 |
| Terminal-Bench | Not measured | 43.2% | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| WeirdML | 52.2% | 45.6% | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 821.6 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | Not measured | 1483 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | Not measured | 1471 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: React | Not measured | 1429 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | Not measured | 1426 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | Not measured | 1439 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Kimi K2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | Not measured | 23.5 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.3 | 148.1 | Kimi K2.5 |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Kimi K2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | Not measured | 1136 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | Not measured | 1114 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | Not measured | 1147 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Android apps | Not measured | 1118 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Godot games | Not measured | 1219 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | Not measured | 35.8% | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 15.9% | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 28.5% | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 31.3% | 95.9% | Kimi K2.5 |
| DeepResearch Bench | 37.3% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured |
| OSWorld | Not measured | 63.3% | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | Not measured | $1,198 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Kimi K2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | Not measured | 84.1% | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | Not measured | 84.3% | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 82.2% | 87.9% | Kimi K2.5 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 17.2% | 30.7% | Kimi K2.5 |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 81.8% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured |
| ARC-AGI | Not measured | 65.3% | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | Not measured | 11.8% | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| SimpleBench | Not measured | 46.8% | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | Not measured | 1453 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | Not measured | 1466 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | Not measured | 1460 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1282 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1297 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 67.2% | 78.5% | Kimi K2.5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Kimi K2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | Not measured | 95.6% | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 80.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 27.7% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured |
| LMArena Text: math | Not measured | 1470 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | Not measured | 1473 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Kimi K2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | Not measured | 85.9% | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | Not measured | 58.7% | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | Not measured | 68.3% | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | Not measured | 74.2% | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | Not measured | 66.5% | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | Not measured | 94.4% | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | Not measured | 39.3% | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | Not measured | 34.3% | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | Not measured | 1459 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | Not measured | 1448 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | Not measured | 1441 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | Not measured | 1427 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Kimi K2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | Not measured | 1248 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | Not measured | 1236 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | Not measured | 1207 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1219 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | Not measured | 1205 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | Not measured | 1236 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | Not measured | 1149 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | Not measured | 1166 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Kimi K2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAGE (Vals AI) | Not measured | 49.9% | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | Not measured | 76.4% | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| IFBench | 77.2% | 70.2% | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 74.3% | 78.0% | Kimi K2.5 |
| DTBench | 76.8% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured |
| LMCA | 35.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured |
| Fiction.LiveBench | Not measured | 86.1% | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| CL-bench | Not measured | 19.3% | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| CL-bench Life | Not measured | 13.2% | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| LMArena Text | Not measured | 1445 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | Not measured | 1431 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | Not measured | 1422 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision | Not measured | 1269 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: English | Not measured | 1453 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | Not measured | 1433 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | Not measured | 1494 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: German | Not measured | 1441 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | Not measured | 1423 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | Not measured | 1412 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: French | Not measured | 1454 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | Not measured | 1450 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | Not measured | 1435 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1445 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | Not measured | 1444 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | Not measured | 1445 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | Not measured | 1425 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | Not measured | 1417 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: English | Not measured | 1274 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1328 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1276 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | Not measured | 1284 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: captioning | Not measured | 1257 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | Not measured | 1285 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1269 | Only Kimi K2.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Kimi K2.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Google Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | MoonshotAI Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Moonshot AI | |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | May 7, 2026 | January 27, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 262K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.25 | $0.532 |
| Output $/Mtok | $1.50 | $2.85 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | 38.6 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 3 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | $0.24 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than Kimi K2.5 for coding?
Only Kimi K2.5 has a coding score, 38.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite for output tokens 1.9x cheaper ($1.50 vs $2.85 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens).
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Kimi K2.5?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.5 costs $0.532 and $2.85. Cost per solved task is known for Kimi K2.5 only.
Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Kimi K2.5?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Kimi K2.5 comparison based on?
9 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Kimi K2.5's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.