Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs GPT-5.3-Codex

GPT-5.3-Codex leads Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview on coding, 60.0 to 22.7 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs 9.3x less per output token ($1.50 vs $14.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 17 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGoogle
Coding
22.7
Overall
36.6
Output $/M
$1.50
2
GPT-5.3-CodexOpenAI
Coding
60.0
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$14.00
15
vs boards won of 17 shared

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview or GPT-5.3-Codex: which to pick

Pick GPT-5.3-Codex for coding: it scores 60.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 22.7 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview.

Pick Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview for output tokens 9.3x cheaper ($1.50 vs $14.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.18 against $0.59).

Shared results
17
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview only
62
GPT-5.3-Codex only
17
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 22.7 from 3 benchmarks, GPT-5.3-Codex 60.0 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 25.1 points apart on average over 8 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 0.0% against GPT-5.3-Codex 61.8%, 61.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview $1.50 against GPT-5.3-Codex $14.00 per million output tokens, 9.3x apart.
Context window
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview takes 1.05M tokens, GPT-5.3-Codex 400K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewBarsGPT-5.3-CodexTies
Coding08
Intelligence01
Web design26
All shared boards215
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index08
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and GPT-5.3-Codex
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGPT-5.3-CodexLeader
LMArena WebDev12571407GPT-5.3-Codex
AA Coding Index34.7Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)80.1%87.3%GPT-5.3-Codex
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)62.8%78.0%GPT-5.3-Codex
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)0.0%61.8%GPT-5.3-Codex
Code migration (Vals AI)4.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured53.8%Only GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)34.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured53.0%Only GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured78.4%Only GPT-5.3-Codex measured
WeirdMLNot measured79.3%Only GPT-5.3-Codex measured
ALE-Bench797.71655.2GPT-5.3-Codex
LMArena Text: coding1400Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1413Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: React12451395GPT-5.3-Codex
LMArena WebDev: HTML12761422GPT-5.3-Codex
LMArena WebDev: from an image13361443GPT-5.3-Codex
SciCode4.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and GPT-5.3-Codex
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGPT-5.3-CodexLeader
AA Intelligence Index15.632.5GPT-5.3-Codex
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured157.1Only GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and GPT-5.3-Codex
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGPT-5.3-CodexLeader
AA Agentic Index1.6Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1032Only GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured983Only GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1053Only GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1084Only GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1124Only GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)30.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)3.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)3.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)8.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured86.0%Only GPT-5.3-Codex measured
METR time horizonsNot measured74.5%Only GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$5,940Only GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and GPT-5.3-Codex
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGPT-5.3-CodexLeader
GPQA Diamond81.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)82.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured91.5%Only GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured42.5%Only GPT-5.3-Codex measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1407Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: expert1398Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1403Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1242Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: homework1271Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and GPT-5.3-Codex
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGPT-5.3-CodexLeader
AIME83.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: math1428Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1417Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and GPT-5.3-Codex
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGPT-5.3-CodexLeader
MMLU Pro86.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)55.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)59.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
MedCode (Vals AI)47.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: science1425Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1428Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1418Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1389Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
FACTS Benchmark Suite51.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index26
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and GPT-5.3-Codex
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGPT-5.3-CodexLeader
Design Arena: websites10821162GPT-5.3-Codex
Design Arena: UI components10691134GPT-5.3-Codex
Design Arena: game dev10291161GPT-5.3-Codex
Design Arena: data viz10451164GPT-5.3-Codex
Design Arena: 3D10471007Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Design Arena: all code categories10721144GPT-5.3-Codex
Design Arena: SVG10521129GPT-5.3-Codex
Design Arena: ASCII art11671152Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and GPT-5.3-Codex
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGPT-5.3-CodexLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)49.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)63.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Vals Multimodal Index41.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
IFBenchNot measured75.4%Only GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured83.3%Only GPT-5.3-Codex measured
LMArena Text1416Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1377Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1401Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision1240Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: English1414Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: non-English1410Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1460Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: German1430Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1413Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: Korean1392Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: French1424Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1421Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: Russian1420Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: Polish1443Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1417Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1394Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1408Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1386Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: English1232Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1278Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1246Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: humor1266Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1259Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1308Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1248Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and GPT-5.3-Codex
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGPT-5.3-CodexLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview$0.0010Fits in one request
GPT-5.3-Codex$0.0088Fits in one request

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview$0.017Fits in one request
GPT-5.3-Codex$0.130Fits in one request

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview$0.065Fits in one request
GPT-5.3-Codex$0.490Fits in one request

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and GPT-5.3-Codex
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewOpenAI GPT-5.3-Codex
MakerGoogleOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedMarch 3, 2026February 24, 2026
Context window1.05M400K
Input $/Mtok$0.25$1.75
Output $/Mtok$1.50$14.00
Coding index22.760.0
Independent measurements behind it33
Cost per solved task$0.18$0.59
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview better than GPT-5.3-Codex for coding?

Pick GPT-5.3-Codex for coding: it scores 60.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 22.7 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview. Pick Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview for output tokens 9.3x cheaper ($1.50 vs $14.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.18 against $0.59).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview or GPT-5.3-Codex?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; GPT-5.3-Codex costs $1.75 and $14.00. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs $0.18 and GPT-5.3-Codex $0.59.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview or GPT-5.3-Codex?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 400K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs GPT-5.3-Codex comparison based on?

17 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and GPT-5.3-Codex's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview-vs-gpt-5-3-codex" title="Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs GPT-5.3-Codex, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview-vs-gpt-5-3-codex">LLMBenchmark.ai, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs GPT-5.3-Codex</a></p>