Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs MiMo-V2.5

MiMo-V2.5 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro on coding, 50.0 to 19.1 on the Vibe Coding Index, and MiMo-V2.5 costs 29.8x less per output token ($0.336 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 62 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace Gemini 2.5 Pro Replace MiMo-V2.5
Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle
Coding
19.1
Overall
41.8
Output $/M
$10.00
37
MiMo-V2.5Xiaomi
Coding
50.0
Overall
50.7
Output $/M
$0.336
25
vs boards won of 62 shared

Gemini 2.5 Pro or MiMo-V2.5: which to pick

Pick MiMo-V2.5 for coding: it scores 50.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 19.1 for Gemini 2.5 Pro.

Pick Gemini 2.5 Pro for work measured by SciCode or LMArena Text: hard prompts, where it leads.

Model AGemini 2.5 ProGoogle19.1/1003 independent benchmarks$0.64 per solved taskModel BMiMo-V2.5Xiaomi50.0/1003 independent benchmarks$0.01 per solved task
Shared results
62
Gemini 2.5 Pro only
28
MiMo-V2.5 only
18
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 2.5 Pro 19.1 from 3 benchmarks, MiMo-V2.5 50.0 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 25.4 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Gemini 2.5 Pro 0.4% against MiMo-V2.5 42.2%, 41.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 2.5 Pro $10.00 against MiMo-V2.5 $0.336 per million output tokens, 29.8x apart.
Context window
Gemini 2.5 Pro takes 1.05M tokens, MiMo-V2.5 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 2.5 ProBarsMiMo-V2.5Ties
Coding18
Intelligence01
Agentic work02
Reasoning34
Math20
Knowledge70
Web design06
General244
All shared boards3725
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index18
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMiMo-V2.5Leader
SWE-bench Verified53.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
LMArena WebDev12261438MiMo-V2.5
AA Coding Index33.356.8MiMo-V2.5
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured81.5%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)54.4%71.0%MiMo-V2.5
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)0.4%42.2%MiMo-V2.5
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured14.2%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured60.7%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)80.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
SciCode46.3%43.9%Gemini 2.5 Pro
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)26.5%41.7%MiMo-V2.5
Terminal-Bench32.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
GSO-Bench3.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
WeirdML54.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
ALE-BenchNot measured514.0Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding14521469MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text: software and IT14591463MiMo-V2.5
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1425Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML12351429MiMo-V2.5
LMArena WebDev: from an image1285Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMiMo-V2.5Leader
AA Intelligence Index16.121.8MiMo-V2.5
Epoch Capabilities Index145.1Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMiMo-V2.5Leader
AA Agentic Index1.615.8MiMo-V2.5
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured36.7%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured7.8%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured9.1%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured55.1%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom54.1%90.6%MiMo-V2.5
GDPval23.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
DeepResearch Bench41.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
Vending-Bench 2$574Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
BrowseComp-Plus29.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index34
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMiMo-V2.5Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured81.6%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured80.0%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)84.4%84.9%MiMo-V2.5
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)22.5%27.2%MiMo-V2.5
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)85.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
ARC-AGI41.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
ARC-AGI-24.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14551450Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Text: expert14521459MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14531461MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Vision: diagrams12741269Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Vision: homework12811262Gemini 2.5 Pro
Kagi LLM Benchmark70.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMiMo-V2.5Leader
AA Math Index87.7Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)87.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
OTIS Mock AIME84.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 324.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
FrontierMath, tier 40.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
ProofBenchNot measured16.0%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena Text: math14501436Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Text: mathematical work14541451Gemini 2.5 Pro
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index70
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMiMo-V2.5Leader
MMLU ProNot measured82.9%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured78.9%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)63.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)60.8%59.9%Gemini 2.5 Pro
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured71.8%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.9%59.3%Gemini 2.5 Pro
MedCode (Vals AI)50.6%31.9%Gemini 2.5 Pro
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)86.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
LMArena Text: science14801440Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14761432Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Text: legal and government14801425Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Text: business and finance14391432Gemini 2.5 Pro
FACTS Benchmark Suite61.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMiMo-V2.5Leader
Design Arena: websites11671266MiMo-V2.5
Design Arena: UI components11401258MiMo-V2.5
Design Arena: game dev11111249MiMo-V2.5
Design Arena: data viz12211249MiMo-V2.5
Design Arena: 3D10811216MiMo-V2.5
Design Arena: all code categories11521260MiMo-V2.5
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1178Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1140Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index244
General benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMiMo-V2.5Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)41.9%43.3%MiMo-V2.5
MedScribe (Vals AI)73.5%72.2%Gemini 2.5 Pro
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured52.8%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
IFBench48.7%67.1%MiMo-V2.5
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)69.0%73.0%MiMo-V2.5
DTBench82.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
LMCA34.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)83.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
LMArena Text14581428Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Text: instruction following14371435Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Text: creative writing14541393Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Vision12631247Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Text: English14581447Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Text: non-English14521405Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Text: Chinese15071469Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Text: German14871421Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Text: Japanese14611306Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Text: Korean14341361Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Text: French14731448Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Text: Spanish14741414Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Text: Russian14611396Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Text: Polish14791413Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Text: multi-turn14531445Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Text: longer queries14491445Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Text: writing and language14541409Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14411399Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Vision: English12611259Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Vision: Chinese13001326MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Vision: reading text12701256Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Vision: humor12621226Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Vision: captioning1304Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things12831189Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Vision: creative writing12651230Gemini 2.5 Pro
LMArena Document1421Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Pro and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMiMo-V2.5Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Pro$0.0063Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.5$0.0003Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.5 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Pro$0.092Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.5$0.0094Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.5 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Pro$0.350Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.5$0.037Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.5 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 2.5 Pro and MiMo-V2.5
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 2.5 ProXiaomi MiMo-V2.5
MakerGoogleXiaomi
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJune 17, 2025April 22, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$1.25$0.168
Output $/Mtok$10.00$0.336
Coding index19.150.0
Independent measurements behind it33
Cost per solved task$0.64$0.01
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Pro better than MiMo-V2.5 for coding?

Pick MiMo-V2.5 for coding: it scores 50.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 19.1 for Gemini 2.5 Pro. Pick Gemini 2.5 Pro for work measured by SciCode or LMArena Text: hard prompts, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Pro or MiMo-V2.5?

Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.5 costs $0.168 and $0.336. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $0.64 and MiMo-V2.5 $0.01.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 2.5 Pro or MiMo-V2.5?

MiMo-V2.5, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 2.5 Pro vs MiMo-V2.5 comparison based on?

62 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 2.5 Pro's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and MiMo-V2.5's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gemini-2-5-pro-vs-xiaomi-mimo-v2-5" title="Gemini 2.5 Pro vs MiMo-V2.5, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gemini-2-5-pro-vs-xiaomi-mimo-v2-5">LLMBenchmark.ai, Gemini 2.5 Pro vs MiMo-V2.5</a></p>