Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 2.5 Flash vs MiniMax M3

MiniMax M3 leads Gemini 2.5 Flash on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 29.2 to 15.5, and MiniMax M3 costs 2.1x less per output token ($1.20 vs $2.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 59 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
34.3
Output $/M
$2.50
4
MiniMax M3MiniMax
Coding
39.2
Overall
51.7
Output $/M
$1.20
55
vs boards won of 59 shared

Gemini 2.5 Flash or MiniMax M3: which to pick

Only MiniMax M3 has a coding score, 39.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemini 2.5 Flash has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Gemini 2.5 Flash for a lower cost per solved task ($0.466 against $0.56) and work measured by LMArena Text: Japanese or LMArena Text: Korean, where it leads.

Shared results
59
Gemini 2.5 Flash only
14
MiniMax M3 only
57
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 2.5 Flash not benchmarked, MiniMax M3 39.2 from 6 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 33.7 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Gemini 2.5 Flash 31.6% against MiniMax M3 88.9%, 57.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 2.5 Flash $2.50 against MiniMax M3 $1.20 per million output tokens, 2.1x apart.
Context window
Both take 1.05M tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 2.5 FlashBarsMiniMax M3Ties
Coding03
Intelligence02
Agentic work02
Reasoning08
Math02
Knowledge05
Web design07
General426
All shared boards455
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashMiniMax M3Leader
SWE-bench Verified28.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LiveBench codingNot measured70.9%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1482Only MiniMax M3 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured58.6Only MiniMax M3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured82.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured75.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured1.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured47.6%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured19.9%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured53.6%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured33.3%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured9.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured51.5%Only MiniMax M3 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured65.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)69.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
SciCodeNot measured47.1%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)13.6%42.4%MiniMax M3
Terminal-Bench17.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
FrontierCodeNot measured14.7%Only MiniMax M3 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured640.0Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: coding14231470MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: software and IT14251466MiniMax M3
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1478Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1455Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1470Only MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashMiniMax M3Leader
AA Intelligence Index15.529.2MiniMax M3
Epoch Capabilities Index142.9146.9MiniMax M3
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashMiniMax M3Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured29.5Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1200Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1197Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1169Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1159Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1158Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1130Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1181Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1028Only MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured68.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured8.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured12.4%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured48.3%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured20.6%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured29.8%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured47.8%Only MiniMax M3 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom31.6%88.9%MiniMax M3
APEX-AgentsNot measured37.7%Only MiniMax M3 measured
OSWorld 2.0Not measured4.6%Only MiniMax M3 measured
BALROG33.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Vending-Bench 2$549$2,158MiniMax M3
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)56.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
BrowseComp-Plus39.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashMiniMax M3Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured92.7%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured74.5%Only MiniMax M3 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured81.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)79.0%92.9%MiniMax M3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)12.1%39.0%MiniMax M3
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured90.9%Only MiniMax M3 measured
ARC-AGI33.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
ARC-AGI-22.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
SimpleBench41.2%45.8%MiniMax M3
Chess puzzlesNot measured13.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured8.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14221447MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: expert14261461MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14201455MiniMax M3
LMArena Vision: diagrams12451266MiniMax M3
LMArena Vision: homework12441268MiniMax M3
Kagi LLM Benchmark56.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashMiniMax M3Leader
AA Math Index73.3Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)73.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured71.1%Only MiniMax M3 measured
ProofBenchNot measured18.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: math14111429MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: mathematical work14221448MiniMax M3
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashMiniMax M3Leader
MMLU ProNot measured84.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.4%Only MiniMax M3 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured68.1%Only MiniMax M3 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured72.7%Only MiniMax M3 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured68.4%Only MiniMax M3 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)40.4%46.3%MiniMax M3
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)83.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: science14331452MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14281441MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: legal and government14301437MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: business and finance14041434MiniMax M3
FACTS Benchmark Suite47.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashMiniMax M3Leader
Design Arena: websites10741257MiniMax M3
Design Arena: UI components10021242MiniMax M3
Design Arena: game dev10041210MiniMax M3
Design Arena: data viz10601236MiniMax M3
Design Arena: 3D10201208MiniMax M3
Design Arena: all code categories10591247MiniMax M3
Design Arena: SVG10201161MiniMax M3
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1161Only MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench designNot measured66.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index426
General benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashMiniMax M3Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured76.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured64.1%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)44.8%50.6%MiniMax M3
MedScribe (Vals AI)83.0%87.3%MiniMax M3
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured60.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
IFBench50.3%82.9%MiniMax M3
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)65.3%83.0%MiniMax M3
DTBench76.5%78.9%MiniMax M3
LMCA27.5%33.7%MiniMax M3
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured55.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text14171433MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: instruction following14051433MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: creative writing14001404MiniMax M3
LMArena Vision12351251MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: English14181443MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: non-English14091420MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: Chinese14491466MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: German14171428MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: Japanese13961380Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Korean13851373Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Text: French14321444MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: Spanish14221433MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: Russian14151426MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: Polish14131423MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: multi-turn14081443MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: longer queries14191446MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: writing and language14051419MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13931403MiniMax M3
LMArena Vision: English12391263MiniMax M3
LMArena Vision: Chinese12841311MiniMax M3
LMArena Vision: reading text12371259MiniMax M3
LMArena Vision: humor12251235MiniMax M3
LMArena Vision: captioning1277Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things12521197Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena Vision: creative writing12411234Gemini 2.5 Flash
LMArena DocumentNot measured1435Only MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashMiniMax M3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash$0.0015Fits in one request
MiniMax M3$0.0009Fits in one request

MiniMax M3 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash$0.022Fits in one request
MiniMax M3$0.019Fits in one request

MiniMax M3 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash$0.085Fits in one request
MiniMax M3$0.072Fits in one request

MiniMax M3 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 2.5 Flash and MiniMax M3
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 2.5 FlashMiniMax M3
MakerGoogleMiniMax
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJune 17, 2025May 31, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.30$0.30
Output $/Mtok$2.50$1.20
Coding indexNot benchmarked39.2
Independent measurements behind it06
Cost per solved task$0.466$0.56
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash better than MiniMax M3 for coding?

Only MiniMax M3 has a coding score, 39.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemini 2.5 Flash has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemini 2.5 Flash for a lower cost per solved task ($0.466 against $0.56) and work measured by LMArena Text: Japanese or LMArena Text: Korean, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash or MiniMax M3?

Gemini 2.5 Flash costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; MiniMax M3 costs $0.30 and $1.20. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Gemini 2.5 Flash costs $0.466 and MiniMax M3 $0.56.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 2.5 Flash or MiniMax M3?

Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 2.5 Flash vs MiniMax M3 comparison based on?

59 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemini 2.5 Flash's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and MiniMax M3's on 6. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next