Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.2

Muse Spark 1.2 leads Gemini 2.5 Flash on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 39.6 to 15.5, and Gemini 2.5 Flash costs 1.7x less per output token ($2.50 vs $4.25 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 47 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
34.3
Output $/M
$2.50
0
Muse Spark 1.2Meta
Coding
55.7
Overall
60.4
Output $/M
$4.25
47
vs boards won of 47 shared

Gemini 2.5 Flash or Muse Spark 1.2: which to pick

Only Muse Spark 1.2 has a coding score, 55.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemini 2.5 Flash has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Gemini 2.5 Flash for output tokens 1.7x cheaper ($2.50 vs $4.25 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.466 against $0.64).

Shared results
47
Gemini 2.5 Flash only
26
Muse Spark 1.2 only
50
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 2.5 Flash not benchmarked, Muse Spark 1.2 55.7 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Web design, 34.0 points apart on average over 7 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: game dev: Gemini 2.5 Flash 1004 against Muse Spark 1.2 1301, 37.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 2.5 Flash $2.50 against Muse Spark 1.2 $4.25 per million output tokens, 1.7x apart.
Context window
Both take 1.05M tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 2.5 FlashBarsMuse Spark 1.2Ties
Coding02
Intelligence02
Reasoning07
Math02
Knowledge05
Web design07
General022
All shared boards047
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashMuse Spark 1.2Leader
SWE-bench Verified28.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LiveBench codingNot measured78.2%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1534Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured72.2Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured86.6%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured6.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured79.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured29.9%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured21.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured69.7%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured53.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)69.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
SciCodeNot measured57.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)13.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench17.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
FrontierSWENot measured12.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
WeirdMLNot measured60.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: coding14231505Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: software and IT14251505Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1526Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1543Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashMuse Spark 1.2Leader
AA Intelligence Index15.539.6Muse Spark 1.2
Epoch Capabilities Index142.9155.1Muse Spark 1.2
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index23 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashMuse Spark 1.2Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured43.2Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1221Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1210Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1181Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1222Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1179Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1085Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1172Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured67.7%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured36.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured21.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured60.6%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured32.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured43.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured57.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured64.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom31.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured45.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
BALROG33.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Vending-Bench 2$549Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)56.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
BrowseComp-Plus39.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashMuse Spark 1.2Leader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured90.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured86.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)79.0%90.4%Muse Spark 1.2
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)12.1%45.5%Muse Spark 1.2
ARC-AGI33.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
ARC-AGI-22.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
SimpleBench41.2%74.5%Muse Spark 1.2
Chess puzzlesNot measured27.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14221489Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: expert14261475Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14201487Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision: diagrams12451317Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision: homework1244Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark56.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashMuse Spark 1.2Leader
AA Math Index73.3Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)73.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
ProofBenchNot measured43.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: math14111484Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: mathematical work14221480Muse Spark 1.2
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashMuse Spark 1.2Leader
MMLU ProNot measured88.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured70.9%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured80.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured65.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)40.4%49.4%Muse Spark 1.2
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)83.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured60.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: science14331500Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14281496Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: legal and government14301517Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: business and finance14041484Muse Spark 1.2
FACTS Benchmark Suite47.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashMuse Spark 1.2Leader
Design Arena: websites10741312Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: UI components10021298Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: game dev10041301Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: data viz10601334Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: 3D10201301Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: all code categories10591312Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: SVG10201284Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1284Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench designNot measured67.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index022
General benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashMuse Spark 1.2Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured76.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured68.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)44.8%47.7%Muse Spark 1.2
MedScribe (Vals AI)83.0%90.1%Muse Spark 1.2
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured69.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
IFBench50.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)65.3%79.0%Muse Spark 1.2
DTBench76.5%94.7%Muse Spark 1.2
LMCA27.5%48.4%Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text14171482Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: instruction following14051462Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: creative writing14001436Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision12351304Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: English14181483Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: non-English14091476Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: Chinese14491509Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: German1417Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1396Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Korean13851462Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: French14321495Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: Spanish14221484Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: Russian14151483Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: Polish1413Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14081502Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: longer queries14191473Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: writing and language14051453Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13931443Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision: English12391291Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision: Chinese1284Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading text12371313Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision: humor1225Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1277Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1252Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1241Not measuredOnly Gemini 2.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashMuse Spark 1.2Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash$0.0015Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.2$0.0034Fits in one request

Gemini 2.5 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash$0.022Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.2$0.075Fits in one request

Gemini 2.5 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash$0.085Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.2$0.292Fits in one request

Gemini 2.5 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 2.5 Flash and Muse Spark 1.2
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 2.5 FlashMeta Muse Spark 1.2
MakerGoogleMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedJune 17, 2025August 5, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.30$1.25
Output $/Mtok$2.50$4.25
Coding indexNot benchmarked55.7
Independent measurements behind it05
Cost per solved task$0.466$0.64
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash better than Muse Spark 1.2 for coding?

Only Muse Spark 1.2 has a coding score, 55.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemini 2.5 Flash has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemini 2.5 Flash for output tokens 1.7x cheaper ($2.50 vs $4.25 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.466 against $0.64).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Muse Spark 1.2?

Gemini 2.5 Flash costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.2 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Gemini 2.5 Flash costs $0.466 and Muse Spark 1.2 $0.64.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Muse Spark 1.2?

Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.2 comparison based on?

47 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemini 2.5 Flash's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark 1.2's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next