Ember-1 vs Muse Spark 1.2
Muse Spark 1.2 leads Ember-1 on coding, 55.7 to 52.6 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Muse Spark 1.2 costs 3.5x less per output token ($4.25 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 11 benchmarks have a result for both.
Ember-1 or Muse Spark 1.2: which to pick
Pick Muse Spark 1.2 for coding: it scores 55.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 52.6 for Ember-1.
Pick Ember-1 for work measured by Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) or Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.
- Shared results
- 11
- Ember-1 only
- 3
- Muse Spark 1.2 only
- 86
- Like-for-like categories
- 3 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
Muse Spark 1.2
Muse Spark 1.2 scores 55.7 against 52.6.
2 and 5 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only Muse Spark 1.2 has a AA Intelligence Index result, 39.6.
Directional only
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Muse Spark 1.2 has a AA Agentic Index result, 43.2.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only Muse Spark 1.2 has a MMLU Pro result, 88.3%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only Muse Spark 1.2 has a Design Arena: websites result, 1312.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
No call
Both take 1.05M tokens.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Muse Spark 1.2
Ember-1 $0.011, Muse Spark 1.2 $0.0034 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Muse Spark 1.2 has the number, $0.64.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Ember-1 52.6 from 2 benchmarks, Muse Spark 1.2 55.7 from 5 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Coding, 10.3 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- IOI (Vals AI): Ember-1 46.3% against Muse Spark 1.2 21.8%, 24.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Ember-1 $15.00 against Muse Spark 1.2 $4.25 per million output tokens, 3.5x apart.
- Context window
- Both take 1.05M tokens.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Ember-1 | Bars | Muse Spark 1.2 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 4 | 0 | 1 tie | |
| Agentic work | 3 | 2 | ||
| General | 0 | 1 | ||
| All shared boards | 7 | 3 | 1 tie |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index40
| Benchmark | Ember-1 | Muse Spark 1.2 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | Not measured | 78.2% | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| LMArena WebDev | Not measured | 1534 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 72.2 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | Not measured | 86.6% | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 20.7% | 6.1% | Ember-1 |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 83.9% | 79.1% | Ember-1 |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 32.5% | 29.9% | Ember-1 |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.5% | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| IOI (Vals AI) | 46.3% | 21.8% | Ember-1 |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 69.7% | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 53.0% | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | 69.5% | 69.5% | Tie |
| SciCode | Not measured | 57.4% | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| FrontierSWE | Not measured | 12.0% | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| WeirdML | Not measured | 60.3% | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | Not measured | 1505 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | Not measured | 1505 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: React | Not measured | 1526 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | Not measured | 1543 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here | |||
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Ember-1 | Muse Spark 1.2 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | Not measured | 39.6 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | Not measured | 155.1 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index32
| Benchmark | Ember-1 | Muse Spark 1.2 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | Not measured | 43.2 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | Not measured | 1221 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | Not measured | 1210 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | Not measured | 1181 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Android apps | Not measured | 1222 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building games | Not measured | 1179 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| Design Arena: HTML slides | Not measured | 1085 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| Design Arena: PowerPoint slides | Not measured | 1172 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| LiveBench research | Not measured | 67.7% | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| LiveBench browser | Not measured | 36.0% | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | Not measured | 21.3% | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.0% | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 51.8% | 60.6% | Muse Spark 1.2 |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 31.1% | 32.8% | Muse Spark 1.2 |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 44.7% | 43.8% | Ember-1 |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 63.4% | 57.0% | Ember-1 |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | 67.0% | 64.8% | Ember-1 |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 5.7% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| Vals Science Index | 31.8% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| APEX-Agents | Not measured | 45.4% | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here | |||
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Ember-1 | Muse Spark 1.2 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench reasoning | Not measured | 90.0% | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | 22.5% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | Not measured | 86.1% | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 90.4% | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 45.5% | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| SimpleBench | Not measured | 74.5% | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| Chess puzzles | Not measured | 27.0% | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | Not measured | 1489 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | Not measured | 1475 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | Not measured | 1487 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1317 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Ember-1 | Muse Spark 1.2 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | Not measured | 43.0% | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | Not measured | 1484 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | Not measured | 1480 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Ember-1 | Muse Spark 1.2 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | Not measured | 88.3% | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 85.3% | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | Not measured | 70.9% | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | Not measured | 80.4% | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | Not measured | 65.4% | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | Not measured | 49.4% | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | Not measured | 60.3% | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | Not measured | 1500 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | Not measured | 1496 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | Not measured | 1517 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | Not measured | 1484 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Ember-1 | Muse Spark 1.2 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | Not measured | 1312 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | Not measured | 1298 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | Not measured | 1301 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1334 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | Not measured | 1301 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | Not measured | 1312 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | Not measured | 1284 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | Not measured | 1284 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| LiveBench design | Not measured | 67.1% | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Ember-1 | Muse Spark 1.2 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench data analysis | Not measured | 76.5% | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 66.2% | 68.5% | Muse Spark 1.2 |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | Not measured | 47.7% | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | Not measured | 90.1% | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| Vals Multimodal Index | Not measured | 69.8% | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | Not measured | 79.0% | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| DTBench | Not measured | 94.7% | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| LMCA | Not measured | 48.4% | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| LMArena Text | Not measured | 1482 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | Not measured | 1462 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | Not measured | 1436 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| LMArena Vision | Not measured | 1304 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| LMArena Text: English | Not measured | 1483 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | Not measured | 1476 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | Not measured | 1509 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | Not measured | 1462 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| LMArena Text: French | Not measured | 1495 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | Not measured | 1484 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | Not measured | 1483 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | Not measured | 1502 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | Not measured | 1473 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | Not measured | 1453 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | Not measured | 1443 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| LMArena Vision: English | Not measured | 1291 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1313 | Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Ember-1 | Muse Spark 1.2 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Muse Spark 1.2 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Muse Spark 1.2 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Muse Spark 1.2 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Fireworks Ember-1 | Meta Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Fireworks | Meta |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | September 24, 2026 | August 5, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $3.00 | $1.25 |
| Output $/Mtok | $15.00 | $4.25 |
| Coding index | 52.6 | 55.7 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 2 | 5 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | $0.64 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Ember-1 better than Muse Spark 1.2 for coding?
Pick Muse Spark 1.2 for coding: it scores 55.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 52.6 for Ember-1. Pick Ember-1 for work measured by Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) or Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Ember-1 or Muse Spark 1.2?
Ember-1 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.2 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for Muse Spark 1.2 only.
Which has the bigger context window, Ember-1 or Muse Spark 1.2?
Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.
How many benchmarks is the Ember-1 vs Muse Spark 1.2 comparison based on?
11 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Ember-1's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark 1.2's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.