Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Glimpse vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs 1.2x less per output token than Glimpse ($2.50 vs $3.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

E GlimpseElorian
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$3.00
Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogle
Coding
49.0
Overall
22.2
Output $/M
$2.50
vs $3.00 vs $2.50 per 1M output tokens. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is 1.2x cheaper.

Glimpse or Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: which to pick

Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has a coding score, 49.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Glimpse has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

No benchmark has tested both yet. Glimpse has none yet; Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite on LMArena WebDev, AA Coding Index and LiveCodeBench (Vals AI). Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Glimpse not benchmarked, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 49.0 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Glimpse $3.00 against Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite $2.50 per million output tokens, 1.2x apart.
Context window
Glimpse takes 262K tokens, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index16 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Glimpse and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
BenchmarkGlimpseGemini 3.5 Flash LiteLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1435Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured49.3Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured79.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured75.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured37.2%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured6.2%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured50.2%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured59.1%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
SciCodeNot measured41.3%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
WeirdMLNot measured39.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ALE-BenchNot measured765.3Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1453Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1451Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1408Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1448Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Glimpse and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
BenchmarkGlimpseGemini 3.5 Flash LiteLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured22.2Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured144.9Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Glimpse and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
BenchmarkGlimpseGemini 3.5 Flash LiteLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured14.3Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured47.4%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured7.2%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured13.9%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured43.2%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured29.3%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Glimpse and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
BenchmarkGlimpseGemini 3.5 Flash LiteLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured83.8%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured83.6%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured83.8%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured18.8%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured83.3%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ARC-AGINot measured53.5%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured10.3%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured21.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured19.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1441Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1434Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1440Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1284Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1291Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Glimpse and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
BenchmarkGlimpseGemini 3.5 Flash LiteLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured71.1%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured26.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured0.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ProofBenchNot measured13.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1434Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1433Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Glimpse and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
BenchmarkGlimpseGemini 3.5 Flash LiteLeader
MMLU ProNot measured85.8%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured84.1%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured60.7%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured72.6%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured68.7%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured43.5%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1451Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1438Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1431Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1423Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index29 boards measured
General benchmarks for Glimpse and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
BenchmarkGlimpseGemini 3.5 Flash LiteLeader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured51.8%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured47.3%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured70.9%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured76.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
DTBenchNot measured83.5%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMCANot measured37.6%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena TextNot measured1435Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1419Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1421Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1269Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1438Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1427Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1468Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1454Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1426Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1407Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1451Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1441Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1443Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1437Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1445Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1435Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1428Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1414Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1269Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1311Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1280Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1287Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1260Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Glimpse$0.0021Fits in one request
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite$0.0015Fits in one request

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Glimpse$0.039Fits in one request
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite$0.022Fits in one request

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Glimpse$0.150Fits in one request
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite$0.085Fits in one request

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Glimpse and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
SpecificationElorian GlimpseGoogle Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
MakerElorianGoogle
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 17, 2026July 21, 2026
Context window262K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.60$0.30
Output $/Mtok$3.00$2.50
Coding indexNot benchmarked49.0
Independent measurements behind it03
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.41
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Glimpse better than Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite for coding?

Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has a coding score, 49.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Glimpse has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Glimpse or Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?

Glimpse costs $0.60 per million input tokens and $3.00 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs $0.30 and $2.50. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite only.

Which has the bigger context window, Glimpse or Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

Has any benchmark tested both Glimpse and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Glimpse has none yet; Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite on LMArena WebDev, AA Coding Index and LiveCodeBench (Vals AI). Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next