Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Devstral 2 2512 vs GPT-5.4 Nano

Updated October 21, 2026. 5 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Devstral 2 2512Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
8.6
Output $/M
$2.00
0
GPT-5.4 NanoOpenAI
Coding
44.8
Overall
20.7
Output $/M
$1.25
5
vs boards won of 5 shared

Decision reading

Only GPT-5.4 Nano has a coding score, 44.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; Devstral 2 2512 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
5
Devstral 2 2512 only
1
GPT-5.4 Nano only
79
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Devstral 2 2512 not benchmarked, GPT-5.4 Nano 44.8 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 21.3 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI): Devstral 2 2512 51.8% against GPT-5.4 Nano 84.0%, 32.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Devstral 2 2512 $2.00 against GPT-5.4 Nano $1.25 per million output tokens, 1.6x apart.
Context window
Devstral 2 2512 takes 262K tokens, GPT-5.4 Nano 400K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDevstral 2 2512BarsGPT-5.4 NanoTies
Coding03
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
All shared boards05
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and GPT-5.4 Nano
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512GPT-5.4 NanoLeader
SWE-bench Verified53.8%Not measuredOnly Devstral 2 2512 measured
AA Coding Index31.356.1GPT-5.4 Nano
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)51.8%84.0%GPT-5.4 Nano
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)62.8%69.8%GPT-5.4 Nano
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured26.1%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured14.5%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured41.6%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
SciCodeNot measured47.2%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured42.4%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
WeirdMLNot measured49.2%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1004.5Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1404Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1402Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and GPT-5.4 Nano
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512GPT-5.4 NanoLeader
AA Intelligence Index8.620.7GPT-5.4 Nano
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured146.0Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and GPT-5.4 Nano
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512GPT-5.4 NanoLeader
AA Agentic Index2.316.0GPT-5.4 Nano
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured38.2%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured5.0%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured6.3%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured44.8%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured76.0%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and GPT-5.4 Nano
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512GPT-5.4 NanoLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured77.5%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured73.6%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured81.7%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured28.3%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured78.5%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
ARC-AGINot measured51.5%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured5.7%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured45.0%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured9.0%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1381Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1396Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1387Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1210Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1225Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and GPT-5.4 Nano
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512GPT-5.4 NanoLeader
AIMENot measured88.8%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured87.8%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured44.9%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured12.2%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
ProofBenchNot measured5.0%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1405Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1409Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and GPT-5.4 Nano
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512GPT-5.4 NanoLeader
MMLU ProNot measured77.2%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured77.9%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured51.9%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured61.2%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured67.4%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured59.1%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured41.0%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured11.7%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1374Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1369Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1368Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1366Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and GPT-5.4 Nano
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512GPT-5.4 NanoLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index31 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and GPT-5.4 Nano
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512GPT-5.4 NanoLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured38.1%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured77.1%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured47.6%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
IFBenchNot measured75.9%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured76.7%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
DTBenchNot measured80.3%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMCANot measured36.9%Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena TextNot measured1372Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1362Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1315Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1196Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1381Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1359Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1391Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1368Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1343Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1321Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1395Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1371Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1363Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1366Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1382Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1365Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1338Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1325Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1202Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1232Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1204Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1161Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1141Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1159Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and GPT-5.4 Nano
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512GPT-5.4 NanoLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Devstral 2 2512$0.0014Fits in one request
GPT-5.4 Nano$0.0008Fits in one request

GPT-5.4 Nano costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Devstral 2 2512$0.026Fits in one request
GPT-5.4 Nano$0.014Fits in one request

GPT-5.4 Nano costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Devstral 2 2512$0.100Fits in one request
GPT-5.4 Nano$0.052Fits in one request

GPT-5.4 Nano costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Devstral 2 2512 and GPT-5.4 Nano
SpecificationMistral Devstral 2 2512OpenAI GPT-5.4 Nano
MakerMistral AIOpenAI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedDecember 9, 2025March 17, 2026
Context window262K400K
Input $/Mtok$0.40$0.20
Output $/Mtok$2.00$1.25
Coding indexNot benchmarked44.8
Independent measurements behind it12
Cost per solved task$1.19$0.14
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Devstral 2 2512 better than GPT-5.4 Nano for coding?

Only GPT-5.4 Nano has a coding score, 44.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; Devstral 2 2512 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Devstral 2 2512 or GPT-5.4 Nano?

Devstral 2 2512 costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 Nano costs $0.20 and $1.25. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Devstral 2 2512 costs $1.19 and GPT-5.4 Nano $0.14.

Which has the bigger context window, Devstral 2 2512 or GPT-5.4 Nano?

GPT-5.4 Nano, with 400K tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Devstral 2 2512 vs GPT-5.4 Nano comparison based on?

5 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Devstral 2 2512's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and GPT-5.4 Nano's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next