Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs GPT-5.2-Codex

GPT-5.2-Codex leads DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 on coding, 45.4 to 38.7 on the Vibe Coding Index, and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 costs 4.7x less per output token ($2.976 vs $14.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 11 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423DeepSeek
Coding
38.7
Overall
50.0
Output $/M
$2.976
6
GPT-5.2-CodexOpenAI
Coding
45.4
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$14.00
5
vs boards won of 11 shared

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 or GPT-5.2-Codex: which to pick

Pick GPT-5.2-Codex for coding: it scores 45.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 38.7 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423, though on 3 benchmarks against 5.

Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 for output tokens 4.7x cheaper ($2.976 vs $14.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 400K tokens).

Shared results
11
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 only
73
GPT-5.2-Codex only
11
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 38.7 from 5 benchmarks, GPT-5.2-Codex 45.4 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 10.8 points apart on average over 7 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: React: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 1441 against GPT-5.2-Codex 1329, 18.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 $2.976 against GPT-5.2-Codex $14.00 per million output tokens, 4.7x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 takes 1.05M tokens, GPT-5.2-Codex 400K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4 Pro 0423BarsGPT-5.2-CodexTies
Coding52
Intelligence10
Agentic work03
All shared boards65
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index52
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 and GPT-5.2-Codex
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0423GPT-5.2-CodexLeader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured72.8%Only GPT-5.2-Codex measured
SWE-bench MultilingualNot measured66.3%Only GPT-5.2-Codex measured
LMArena WebDev14471339DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423
AA Coding Index59.4Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)87.5%88.0%GPT-5.2-Codex
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)77.4%72.4%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)11.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)49.9%37.9%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423
Code migration (Vals AI)26.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)50.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)51.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured37.1%Only GPT-5.2-Codex measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured66.5%Only GPT-5.2-Codex measured
FrontierCode17.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
WeirdML48.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
ALE-Bench1006.11299.9GPT-5.2-Codex
LMArena Text: coding1470Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1469Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
LMArena WebDev: React14411329DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423
LMArena WebDev: HTML14351348DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 and GPT-5.2-Codex
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0423GPT-5.2-CodexLeader
AA Intelligence Index30.428.5DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423
Epoch Capabilities Index149.1Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 and GPT-5.2-Codex
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0423GPT-5.2-CodexLeader
AA Agentic Index26.3Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps10001051GPT-5.2-Codex
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps948993GPT-5.2-Codex
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1090Only GPT-5.2-Codex measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1176Only GPT-5.2-Codex measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games10591142GPT-5.2-Codex
Finance Agent (Vals AI)44.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)25.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)23.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)51.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured92.1%Only GPT-5.2-Codex measured
Vending-Bench 2$3,285Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 and GPT-5.2-Codex
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0423GPT-5.2-CodexLeader
GPQA Diamond89.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured89.9%Only GPT-5.2-Codex measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured35.7%Only GPT-5.2-Codex measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)90.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
Chess puzzles19.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
Mystery game puzzles17.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1461Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
LMArena Text: expert1463Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1466Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark53.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 and GPT-5.2-Codex
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0423GPT-5.2-CodexLeader
OTIS Mock AIME96.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 345.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
FrontierMath, tier 42.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
ProofBench16.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
LMArena Text: math1443Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1455Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 and GPT-5.2-Codex
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0423GPT-5.2-CodexLeader
MMLU Pro87.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)80.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)59.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)61.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)72.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)40.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
SimpleQA Verified47.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
LMArena Text: science1470Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1466Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1464Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1443Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 and GPT-5.2-Codex
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0423GPT-5.2-CodexLeader
Design Arena: websites1234Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
Design Arena: UI components1219Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
Design Arena: game dev1228Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
Design Arena: data viz1203Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
Design Arena: 3D1253Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1240Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
Design Arena: SVG1139Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1149Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index25 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 and GPT-5.2-Codex
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0423GPT-5.2-CodexLeader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)62.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)75.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
IFBenchNot measured77.6%Only GPT-5.2-Codex measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured82.3%Only GPT-5.2-Codex measured
DTBench90.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
LMCA41.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
Surface Evolver Bench40.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
CL-bench Life13.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
LMArena Text1451Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1445Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1446Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
LMArena Text: English1459Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1439Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1481Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
LMArena Text: German1458Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1446Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1409Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
LMArena Text: French1473Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1457Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1453Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1461Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1468Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1458Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1447Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1431Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 and GPT-5.2-Codex
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0423GPT-5.2-CodexLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423$0.0028Fits in one request
GPT-5.2-Codex$0.0088Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423$0.077Fits in one request
GPT-5.2-Codex$0.130Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423$0.301Fits in one request
GPT-5.2-Codex$0.490Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 and GPT-5.2-Codex
SpecificationDeepSeek V4 Pro 0423OpenAI GPT-5.2-Codex
MakerDeepSeekOpenAI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 24, 2026January 14, 2026
Context window1.05M400K
Input $/Mtok$1.358$1.75
Output $/Mtok$2.976$14.00
Coding index38.745.4
Independent measurements behind it53
Cost per solved task$0.57$0.43
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 better than GPT-5.2-Codex for coding?

Pick GPT-5.2-Codex for coding: it scores 45.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 38.7 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423, though on 3 benchmarks against 5. Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 for output tokens 4.7x cheaper ($2.976 vs $14.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 400K tokens).

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 or GPT-5.2-Codex?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 costs $1.358 per million input tokens and $2.976 per million output tokens; GPT-5.2-Codex costs $1.75 and $14.00. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 costs $0.57 and GPT-5.2-Codex $0.43.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 or GPT-5.2-Codex?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423, with 1.05M tokens against 400K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs GPT-5.2-Codex comparison based on?

11 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and GPT-5.2-Codex's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-vs-gpt-5-2-codex" title="DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs GPT-5.2-Codex, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-vs-gpt-5-2-codex">LLMBenchmark.ai, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs GPT-5.2-Codex</a></p>