DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs GPT-5.5
GPT-5.5 leads DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 38.4 to 34.8, and DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp costs 22.7x less per output token ($1.32 vs $30.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 14 benchmarks have a result for both.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or GPT-5.5: which to pick
Only GPT-5.5 has a coding score, 71.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp for output tokens 22.7x cheaper ($1.32 vs $30.00 per million) and work measured by AA Agentic Index or LiveBench research, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 14
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp only
- 0
- GPT-5.5 only
- 120
- Like-for-like categories
- 6 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only GPT-5.5 has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
GPT-5.5
GPT-5.5 leads, 38.4 against 34.8.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp leads, 47.5 against 36.4.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only GPT-5.5 has a GPQA Diamond result, 93.2%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only GPT-5.5 has a MMLU Pro result, 88.1%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only GPT-5.5 has a Design Arena: websites result, 1256.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
GPT-5.5
GPT-5.5 takes 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp $0.0011, GPT-5.5 $0.020 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only GPT-5.5 has the number, $1.65.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp not benchmarked, GPT-5.5 71.3 from 5 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Coding, 21.3 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- LiveBench coding: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp 37.6% against GPT-5.5 85.1%, 47.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp $1.32 against GPT-5.5 $30.00 per million output tokens, 22.7x apart.
- Context window
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp takes 1.05M tokens, GPT-5.5 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp | Bars | GPT-5.5 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 3 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 1 | ||
| Agentic work | 3 | 1 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 3 | ||
| Web design | 1 | 0 | ||
| General | 0 | 2 | ||
| All shared boards | 4 | 10 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp | GPT-5.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | 37.6% | 85.1% | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena WebDev | Not measured | 1513 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| AA Coding Index | 65.0 | 74.9 | GPT-5.5 |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 85.3% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | Not measured | 82.6% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 69.8% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | Not measured | 45.2% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.5% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 76.4% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 62.5% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| SciCode | 49.7% | 56.1% | GPT-5.5 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 60.6% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Terminal-Bench | Not measured | 84.7% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| FrontierCode | Not measured | 43.0% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| GSO-Bench | Not measured | 40.2% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| WeirdML | Not measured | 84.9% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| MirrorCode | Not measured | 10.0% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 1943.0 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | Not measured | 1494 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | Not measured | 1493 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: React | Not measured | 1506 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | Not measured | 1543 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | Not measured | 1532 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp | GPT-5.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 34.8 | 38.4 | GPT-5.5 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | Not measured | 159.7 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index31
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp | GPT-5.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 47.5 | 36.4 | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | Not measured | 1117 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | Not measured | 1089 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | Not measured | 1143 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Android apps | Not measured | 1163 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Godot games | Not measured | 1173 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building games | Not measured | 1179 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Design Arena: HTML slides | Not measured | 1067 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Design Arena: PowerPoint slides | Not measured | 1109 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LiveBench research | 69.2% | 61.6% | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp |
| LiveBench browser | 64.0% | 48.0% | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp |
| LiveBench long agentic | 39.0% | 44.6% | GPT-5.5 |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 3.8% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | Not measured | 51.8% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 21.8% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 40.4% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 64.5% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Time Horizon Index (Vals AI) | Not measured | 8.3% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | Not measured | 93.9% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| APEX-Agents | Not measured | 55.1% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Remote Labor Index | Not measured | 6.3% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| OSWorld 2.0 | Not measured | 13.0% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| DeepResearch Bench | Not measured | 54.0% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| PostTrainBench | Not measured | 27.2% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | Not measured | $7,524 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp | GPT-5.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | Not measured | 93.2% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LiveBench reasoning | 85.4% | 89.7% | GPT-5.5 |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | Not measured | 88.3% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 91.3% | 93.5% | GPT-5.5 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 34.5% | 45.8% | GPT-5.5 |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | Not measured | 90.7% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| ARC-AGI | Not measured | 95.0% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | Not measured | 85.0% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| SimpleBench | Not measured | 69.0% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Chess puzzles | Not measured | 63.0% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | Not measured | 56.0% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| EBR-bench | Not measured | 34.3% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | Not measured | 1489 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | Not measured | 1507 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | Not measured | 1483 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1325 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1332 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | Not measured | 88.8% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp | GPT-5.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | Not measured | 84.4% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | Not measured | 85.3% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | Not measured | 72.5% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| ProofBench | Not measured | 50.0% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | Not measured | 1487 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | Not measured | 1496 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp | GPT-5.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | Not measured | 88.1% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 86.5% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | Not measured | 66.2% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | Not measured | 68.4% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | Not measured | 75.0% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | Not measured | 68.8% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | Not measured | 49.1% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | Not measured | 63.0% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | Not measured | 1485 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | Not measured | 1465 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | Not measured | 1491 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | Not measured | 1478 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| FACTS Benchmark Suite | Not measured | 66.7% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp | GPT-5.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | Not measured | 1256 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | Not measured | 1260 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | Not measured | 1294 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1265 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | Not measured | 1198 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | Not measured | 1260 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | Not measured | 1234 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | Not measured | 1255 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LiveBench design | 70.7% | 70.3% | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp | GPT-5.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench data analysis | 79.5% | 81.6% | GPT-5.5 |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 60.9% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | Not measured | 51.5% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | Not measured | 86.9% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Vals Multimodal Index | Not measured | 68.1% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| IFBench | Not measured | 75.9% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 81.3% | 84.3% | GPT-5.5 |
| DTBench | Not measured | 96.0% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMCA | Not measured | 54.3% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Surface Evolver Bench | Not measured | 88.1% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Furniture assembly | Not measured | 44.2% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| ExploitBench | Not measured | 47.4% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| CL-bench Life | Not measured | 22.2% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text | Not measured | 1471 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | Not measured | 1478 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | Not measured | 1455 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision | Not measured | 1297 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: English | Not measured | 1470 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | Not measured | 1467 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | Not measured | 1534 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: German | Not measured | 1480 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | Not measured | 1499 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | Not measured | 1460 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: French | Not measured | 1485 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | Not measured | 1468 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | Not measured | 1473 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1465 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | Not measured | 1476 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | Not measured | 1484 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | Not measured | 1466 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | Not measured | 1449 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: English | Not measured | 1292 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1360 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1306 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | Not measured | 1293 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | Not measured | 1231 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1301 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Document | Not measured | 1486 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp | GPT-5.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp | OpenAI GPT-5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | DeepSeek | OpenAI |
| Weights | Open weights | No public weights listed |
| Released | August 21, 2026 | April 24, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.44 | $5.00 |
| Output $/Mtok | $1.32 | $30.00 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | 71.3 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 1 | 5 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | $1.65 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp better than GPT-5.5 for coding?
Only GPT-5.5 has a coding score, 71.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp for output tokens 22.7x cheaper ($1.32 vs $30.00 per million) and work measured by AA Agentic Index or LiveBench research, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or GPT-5.5?
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp costs $0.44 per million input tokens and $1.32 per million output tokens; GPT-5.5 costs $5.00 and $30.00. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.5 only.
Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or GPT-5.5?
GPT-5.5, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.
How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs GPT-5.5 comparison based on?
14 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and GPT-5.5's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.