Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Qwen3.8 27B

Qwen3.8 27B leads DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 on coding, 74.2 to 51.8 on the Vibe Coding Index, and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 costs 6.4x less per output token ($0.396 vs $2.55 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 33 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731DeepSeek
Coding
51.8
Overall
55.2
Output $/M
$0.396
23
Qwen3.8 27BQwen
Coding
74.2
Overall
59.6
Output $/M
$2.55
9
vs boards won of 33 shared, 1 tied

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or Qwen3.8 27B: which to pick

Pick Qwen3.8 27B for coding: it scores 74.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 51.8 for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731.

Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 for output tokens 6.4x cheaper ($0.396 vs $2.55 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.01 against $1.26).

Shared results
33
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 only
22
Qwen3.8 27B only
52
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 51.8 from 4 benchmarks, Qwen3.8 27B 74.2 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 40.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
ProofBench: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 56.0% against Qwen3.8 27B 16.0%, 40.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 $0.396 against Qwen3.8 27B $2.55 per million output tokens, 6.4x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3.8 27B 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731BarsQwen3.8 27BTies
Coding911 tie
Intelligence20
Agentic work24
Reasoning50
Math10
Knowledge22
General22
All shared boards2391 tie
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index91
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Qwen3.8 27B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Qwen3.8 27BLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured86.8%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1593Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
AA Coding Index69.168.1DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)87.3%84.0%DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)88.8%86.0%DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)18.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)74.7%64.8%DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Code migration (Vals AI)38.6%14.2%DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%0.0%Tie
IOI (Vals AI)32.7%39.1%Qwen3.8 27B
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)67.0%58.4%DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
SkillsBench (Vals AI)50.7%38.1%DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
CyberBench (Vals AI)72.1%67.8%DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
SciCode50.3%46.6%DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
FrontierCode18.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
WeirdML63.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
ALE-Bench1306.1Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1483Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1478Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1602Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1570Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1577Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Qwen3.8 27B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Qwen3.8 27BLeader
AA Intelligence Index34.333.7DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Epoch Capabilities Index154.8151.7DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index24
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Qwen3.8 27B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Qwen3.8 27BLeader
AA Agentic Index41.045.8Qwen3.8 27B
LiveBench researchNot measured59.4%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LiveBench browserNot measured32.0%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured27.9%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)49.5%48.5%DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)28.1%30.9%Qwen3.8 27B
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)30.3%36.1%Qwen3.8 27B
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)57.0%59.7%Qwen3.8 27B
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)64.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)4.3%0.0%DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
APEX-AgentsNot measured47.5%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Qwen3.8 27B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Qwen3.8 27BLeader
GPQA Diamond89.9%88.9%DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
LiveBench reasoningNot measured80.0%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured83.9%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)90.8%90.5%DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)38.6%33.9%DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)91.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
ARC-AGI89.0%87.5%DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
ARC-AGI-261.4%42.4%DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
SimpleBench61.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
Chess puzzles32.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
Mystery game puzzles34.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1459Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1479Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1461Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1285Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1295Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Qwen3.8 27B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Qwen3.8 27BLeader
OTIS Mock AIME94.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 357.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
FrontierMath, tier 424.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
ProofBench56.0%16.0%DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1455Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1458Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Qwen3.8 27B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Qwen3.8 27BLeader
MMLU Pro86.2%84.3%DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
LegalBench (Vals AI)77.7%82.4%Qwen3.8 27B
CorpFin (Vals AI)61.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)70.7%70.8%Qwen3.8 27B
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured64.9%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
MedCode (Vals AI)41.4%28.7%DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
SimpleQA Verified33.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1467Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1437Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1447Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1438Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Qwen3.8 27B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Qwen3.8 27BLeader
Design Arena: websites1237Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
Design Arena: UI components1233Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
Design Arena: game dev1207Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
Design Arena: data viz1180Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
Design Arena: 3D1208Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1229Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
Design Arena: SVG1184Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1090Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
LiveBench designNot measured75.9%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Qwen3.8 27B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Qwen3.8 27BLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured76.6%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured52.4%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)80.4%83.8%Qwen3.8 27B
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)79.7%82.0%Qwen3.8 27B
DTBench90.9%88.0%DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
LMCA41.7%41.4%DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured45.0%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena TextNot measured1440Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1436Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1383Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1269Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1448Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1428Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1501Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1443Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1387Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1384Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1465Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1449Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1415Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1439Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1440Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1448Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1405Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1393Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1267Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1326Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1281Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1235Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1237Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Qwen3.8 27B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Qwen3.8 27BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731$0.0003Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 27B$0.0017Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731$0.0082Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 27B$0.029Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731$0.032Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 27B$0.111Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Qwen3.8 27B
SpecificationDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Qwen3.8 27B
MakerDeepSeekQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 31, 2026August 14, 2026
Context window1.05M1M
Input $/Mtok$0.14$0.425
Output $/Mtok$0.396$2.55
Coding index51.874.2
Independent measurements behind it44
Cost per solved task$0.01$1.26
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 better than Qwen3.8 27B for coding?

Pick Qwen3.8 27B for coding: it scores 74.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 51.8 for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731. Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 for output tokens 6.4x cheaper ($0.396 vs $2.55 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.01 against $1.26).

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or Qwen3.8 27B?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 costs $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.396 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 27B costs $0.425 and $2.55. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 costs $0.01 and Qwen3.8 27B $1.26.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or Qwen3.8 27B?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Qwen3.8 27B comparison based on?

33 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.8 27B's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0731-vs-qwen3-8-27b" title="DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Qwen3.8 27B, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0731-vs-qwen3-8-27b">LLMBenchmark.ai, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Qwen3.8 27B</a></p>