Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 leads Qwen2.5 72B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 34.3 to 7.7, at about the same output price ($0.396 vs $0.40 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 9 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731DeepSeek
Coding
51.8
Overall
55.2
Output $/M
$0.396
9
Qwen2.5 72B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
26.5
Output $/M
$0.40
0
vs boards won of 9 shared

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: which to pick

Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 has a coding score, 51.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
9
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 only
46
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct only
44
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 51.8 from 4 benchmarks, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 86.4 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 94.4% against Qwen2.5 72B Instruct 8.1%, 86.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 $0.396 against Qwen2.5 72B Instruct $0.40 per million output tokens, 1.0x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct 33K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731BarsQwen2.5 72B InstructTies
Coding10
Intelligence20
Reasoning30
Math10
General20
All shared boards90
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Qwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
AA Coding Index69.1Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)87.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)88.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)18.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)74.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)38.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
IOI (Vals AI)32.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)67.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)50.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)72.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured27.6%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
SciCode50.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured4.5%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
FrontierCode18.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
WeirdML63.0%16.0%DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
ALE-Bench1306.1Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1292Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1292Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Qwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index34.37.7DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Epoch Capabilities Index154.8129.0DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Qwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
AA Agentic Index41.0Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)49.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)28.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)30.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)57.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)64.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)4.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured34.5%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
METR time horizonsNot measured35.8%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
BALROGNot measured16.2%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
TheAgentCompanyNot measured5.7%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Qwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond89.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)90.8%49.1%DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)38.6%3.6%DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)91.0%49.1%DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
ARC-AGI89.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
ARC-AGI-261.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
SimpleBench61.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
Chess puzzles32.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
Mystery game puzzles34.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
BIG-Bench HardNot measured79.8%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1271Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1245Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1279Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Qwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured14.0Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured14.0%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
OTIS Mock AIME94.4%8.1%DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 357.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
FrontierMath, tier 424.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
ProofBench56.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
MATH level 5Not measured63.2%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1283Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1290Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Qwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro86.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)77.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)61.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)70.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)41.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured72.0%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
SimpleQA Verified33.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
MMLUNot measured85.3%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
AI2 Reasoning ChallengeNot measured94.5%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1275Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1258Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1288Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1253Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Qwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websites1237Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
Design Arena: UI components1233Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
Design Arena: game dev1207Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
Design Arena: data viz1180Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
Design Arena: 3D1208Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1229Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
Design Arena: SVG1184Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1090Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Qwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
MedScribe (Vals AI)80.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
IFBenchNot measured36.9%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)79.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 measured
DTBench90.9%62.9%DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
LMCA41.7%13.4%DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
HellaSwagNot measured84.8%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
WinoGrandeNot measured82.3%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
PIQANot measured82.6%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena TextNot measured1269Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1254Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1221Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1283Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1252Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1273Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1234Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1180Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1188Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1280Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1255Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1264Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1272Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1281Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1247Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1211Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Qwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731$0.0003Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct$0.0006Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731$0.0082Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct$0.019Exceeds the context window

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731$0.032Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct$0.076Exceeds the context window

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
SpecificationDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
MakerDeepSeekQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 31, 2026September 19, 2024
Context window1.05M33K
Input $/Mtok$0.14$0.36
Output $/Mtok$0.396$0.40
Coding index51.8Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it40
Cost per solved task$0.01Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 better than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct for coding?

Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 has a coding score, 51.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 costs $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.396 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs $0.36 and $0.40. Cost per solved task is known for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731, with 1.05M tokens against 33K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct comparison based on?

9 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next