Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 leads Qwen3.5 397B A17B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 39.5 to 21.4, and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs 3.9x less per output token ($0.60 vs $2.34 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 18 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
Coding
70.3
Overall
67.6
Output $/M
$0.60
18
Qwen3.5 397B A17BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
57.1
Output $/M
$2.34
0
vs boards won of 18 shared

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Qwen3.5 397B A17B: which to pick

Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has a coding score, 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3.5 397B A17B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
18
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 only
21
Qwen3.5 397B A17B only
48
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 70.3 from 4 benchmarks, Qwen3.5 397B A17B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 29.9 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 71.2% against Qwen3.5 397B A17B 31.2%, 40.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 $0.60 against Qwen3.5 397B A17B $2.34 per million output tokens, 3.9x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3.5 397B A17B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017BarsQwen3.5 397B A17BTies
Coding50
Intelligence10
Reasoning30
Math20
Web design60
General10
All shared boards180
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index50
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
LiveBench coding96.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena WebDev16641400DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)31.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)87.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)44.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
SciCode55.9%44.8%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured40.9%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
ALE-Bench1622.0621.9DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1464Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1463Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena WebDev: React16671388DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena WebDev: HTML16871410DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
AA Intelligence Index39.521.4DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured146.8Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
Design Arena: spreadsheets1259Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench research79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench browser76.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench long agentic50.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)57.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)44.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)45.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)14.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)61.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured95.6%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured24.9%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
LiveBench reasoning89.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured89.3%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)43.3%29.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)93.2%86.4%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Chess puzzles46.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
Mystery game puzzles49.0%18.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1448Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1462Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1450Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1277Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1292Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
OTIS Mock AIME99.4%88.9%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 371.2%31.2%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
FrontierMath, tier 446.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1453Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1454Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
MathArenaNot measured19.2%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
SimpleQA Verified42.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1457Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1455Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1441Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1435Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
Design Arena: websites13101190DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: UI components13061161DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: game dev13521140DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: data viz13061175DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: 3D13631160DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: all code categories13301179DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1139Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1233Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench design83.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
Vals Index61.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
LiveBench data analysis79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 measured
IFBenchNot measured78.8%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.7%77.3%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
DTBenchNot measured87.5%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMCANot measured37.9%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena TextNot measured1437Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1424Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1402Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1262Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1443Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1430Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1498Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1445Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1429Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1384Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1462Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1441Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1430Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1447Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1446Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1441Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1415Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1399Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1268Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1314Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1271Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1262Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1230Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1265Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1260Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0004Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.0016Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.0093Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.027Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.036Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.101Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
SpecificationDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3.5 397B A17B
MakerDeepSeekQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 17, 2026February 16, 2026
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.15$0.39
Output $/Mtok$0.60$2.34
Coding index70.3Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it41
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 better than Qwen3.5 397B A17B for coding?

Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has a coding score, 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3.5 397B A17B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.39 and $2.34. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B comparison based on?

18 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.5 397B A17B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next