Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3.2 vs Muse Spark Open

Muse Spark Open leads DeepSeek V3.2 on coding, 47.4 to 30.0 on the Vibe Coding Index, and DeepSeek V3.2 costs 4.8x less per output token ($0.88 vs $4.25 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 11 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V3.2DeepSeek
Coding
30.0
Overall
37.9
Output $/M
$0.88
0
Muse Spark OpenMeta
Coding
47.4
Overall
44.9
Output $/M
$4.25
11
vs boards won of 11 shared

DeepSeek V3.2 or Muse Spark Open: which to pick

Pick Muse Spark Open for coding: it scores 47.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 30.0 for DeepSeek V3.2.

Pick DeepSeek V3.2 for output tokens 4.8x cheaper ($0.88 vs $4.25 per million).

Shared results
11
DeepSeek V3.2 only
64
Muse Spark Open only
17
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3.2 30.0 from 3 benchmarks, Muse Spark Open 47.4 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 36.4 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): DeepSeek V3.2 5.1% against Muse Spark Open 76.2%, 71.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V3.2 $0.88 against Muse Spark Open $4.25 per million output tokens, 4.8x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3.2 takes 164K tokens, Muse Spark Open 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V3.2BarsMuse Spark OpenTies
Coding04
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning02
Web design02
General01
All shared boards011
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Muse Spark OpenLeader
SWE-bench Verified70.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
SWE-bench Multilingual59.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LiveBench codingNot measured73.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDev13621528Muse Spark Open
AA Coding Index44.2Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)80.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)67.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured6.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)5.1%76.2%Muse Spark Open
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured21.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)86.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
SciCodeNot measured58.4%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)35.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Terminal-Bench39.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1590.1Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena Text: coding1453Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1449Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena WebDev: React13501529Muse Spark Open
LMArena WebDev: HTML13711495Muse Spark Open
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Muse Spark OpenLeader
AA Intelligence Index21.5Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index146.1155.1Muse Spark Open
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Muse Spark OpenLeader
LiveBench researchNot measured80.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench browserNot measured36.0%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured18.9%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured61.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured26.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.5%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured25.0%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured53.7%Only Muse Spark Open measured
τ²-Bench Telecom90.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
APEX-Agents21.3%33.4%Muse Spark Open
Vending-Bench 2$1,034Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Muse Spark OpenLeader
GPQA Diamond80.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured73.7%Only Muse Spark Open measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)84.0%89.0%Muse Spark Open
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)24.6%43.9%Muse Spark Open
ARC-AGI57.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
ARC-AGI-24.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1434Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: expert1436Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1446Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Muse Spark OpenLeader
AIME84.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)86.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
AA Math Index92.0Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)92.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: math1435Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1440Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Muse Spark OpenLeader
MMLU Pro84.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)76.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)55.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)51.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)68.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)93.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)86.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: science1446Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1440Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1425Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1410Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Muse Spark OpenLeader
Design Arena: websites11751310Muse Spark Open
Design Arena: UI components1146Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Design Arena: game dev11311282Muse Spark Open
Design Arena: data viz1158Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Design Arena: 3D1132Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1163Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Design Arena: SVG1032Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1083Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LiveBench designNot measured60.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Muse Spark OpenLeader
Vals IndexNot measured48.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured60.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
IFBench60.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)73.3%78.3%Muse Spark Open
DTBench85.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMCA28.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
CL-bench12.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
CL-bench Life7.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text1425Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1413Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1400Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: English1439Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1409Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1455Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: German1413Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1374Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1370Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: French1429Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1424Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1424Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1419Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1427Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1428Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1407Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1395Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Muse Spark OpenLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2$0.0007Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.0034Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.2 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2$0.017Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.075Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.2 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2$0.067Exceeds the context window
Muse Spark Open$0.292Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.2 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3.2 and Muse Spark Open
SpecificationDeepSeek V3.2Meta Muse Spark Open
MakerDeepSeekMeta
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 1, 2025October 15, 2026
Context window164K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.29$1.25
Output $/Mtok$0.88$4.25
Coding index30.047.4
Independent measurements behind it34
Cost per solved task$0.99Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3.2 better than Muse Spark Open for coding?

Pick Muse Spark Open for coding: it scores 47.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 30.0 for DeepSeek V3.2. Pick DeepSeek V3.2 for output tokens 4.8x cheaper ($0.88 vs $4.25 per million).

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 or Muse Spark Open?

DeepSeek V3.2 costs $0.29 per million input tokens and $0.88 per million output tokens; Muse Spark Open costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for DeepSeek V3.2 only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.2 or Muse Spark Open?

Muse Spark Open, with 1.05M tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3.2 vs Muse Spark Open comparison based on?

11 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V3.2's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark Open's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/deepseek-v3-2-vs-meta-muse-spark-open" title="DeepSeek V3.2 vs Muse Spark Open, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/deepseek-v3-2-vs-meta-muse-spark-open">LLMBenchmark.ai, DeepSeek V3.2 vs Muse Spark Open</a></p>