Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

Gemini 3.6 Flash leads DeepSeek V3.2 Exp on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 34.0 to 16.6, and DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs 9.1x less per output token ($0.41 vs $3.75 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 44 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V3.2 ExpDeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.41
0
Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle
Coding
62.5
Overall
68.3
Output $/M
$3.75
44
vs boards won of 44 shared

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or Gemini 3.6 Flash: which to pick

Only Gemini 3.6 Flash has a coding score, 62.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; DeepSeek V3.2 Exp has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick DeepSeek V3.2 Exp for output tokens 9.1x cheaper ($0.41 vs $3.75 per million).

Shared results
44
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp only
15
Gemini 3.6 Flash only
65
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp not benchmarked, Gemini 3.6 Flash 62.5 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 23.4 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: HTML: DeepSeek V3.2 Exp 1281 against Gemini 3.6 Flash 1547, 44.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp $0.41 against Gemini 3.6 Flash $3.75 per million output tokens, 9.1x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp takes 164K tokens, Gemini 3.6 Flash 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V3.2 ExpBarsGemini 3.6 FlashTies
Coding05
Intelligence02
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
Web design06
General020
All shared boards044
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index05
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Gemini 3.6 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGemini 3.6 FlashLeader
Aider polyglot74.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena WebDev12721538Gemini 3.6 Flash
AA Coding IndexNot measured69.2Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured88.1%Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured79.6%Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured64.0%Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured30.9%Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured35.1%Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured73.8%Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured45.4%Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)78.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
SciCodeNot measured53.4%Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)31.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
FrontierCodeNot measured34.4%Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
WeirdML39.5%56.1%Gemini 3.6 Flash
ALE-BenchNot measured715.5Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding14381491Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: software and IT14381492Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1528Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML12811547Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1545Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
SciCodeNot measured10.8%Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Gemini 3.6 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGemini 3.6 FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index16.634.0Gemini 3.6 Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index144.9154.5Gemini 3.6 Flash
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index19 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Gemini 3.6 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGemini 3.6 FlashLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured29.0Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1197Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1181Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1198Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1204Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1180Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1099Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1121Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1071Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured56.3%Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured18.0%Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured25.0%Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured65.4%Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured58.5%Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured4.3%Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
τ²-Bench Telecom33.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured46.9%Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
TheAgentCompany42.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)56.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Gemini 3.6 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGemini 3.6 FlashLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured93.4%Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured88.4%Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)79.7%92.8%Gemini 3.6 Flash
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)14.9%40.8%Gemini 3.6 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured94.1%Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
ARC-AGINot measured91.2%Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured60.4%Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured42.0%Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured30.0%Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14291486Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: expert14221490Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14441484Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1314Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1314Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Gemini 3.6 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGemini 3.6 FlashLeader
AA Math Index87.7Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)87.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured94.2%Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured58.9%Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured22.0%Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
ProofBenchNot measured36.0%Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena Text: math14221508Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: mathematical work14331492Gemini 3.6 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Gemini 3.6 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGemini 3.6 FlashLeader
MMLU ProNot measured89.3%Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured86.7%Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured63.3%Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured74.9%Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured67.6%Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured53.1%Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)85.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured66.2%Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena Text: science14431489Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14681469Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: legal and government14191479Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: business and finance14121464Gemini 3.6 Flash
FACTS Benchmark SuiteNot measured65.3%Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Gemini 3.6 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGemini 3.6 FlashLeader
Design Arena: websites11781300Gemini 3.6 Flash
Design Arena: UI components11641294Gemini 3.6 Flash
Design Arena: game dev11441263Gemini 3.6 Flash
Design Arena: data viz11521289Gemini 3.6 Flash
Design Arena: 3D11481271Gemini 3.6 Flash
Design Arena: all code categories11701289Gemini 3.6 Flash
Design Arena: SVG1031Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1281Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index020
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Gemini 3.6 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGemini 3.6 FlashLeader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured56.6%Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured48.7%Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured79.7%Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured65.1%Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
IFBench54.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)72.3%80.0%Gemini 3.6 Flash
DTBench87.7%95.5%Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMCA29.1%44.9%Gemini 3.6 Flash
Fiction.LiveBench83.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
CL-bench13.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured23.3%Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
CL-bench Life9.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text14251480Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: instruction following14011467Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: creative writing14041466Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena VisionNot measured1299Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena Text: English14411482Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: non-English14041470Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: Chinese14611531Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: German14401480Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: Japanese13311475Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: Korean13721429Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: French14341503Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: Spanish14411476Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: Russian14121488Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: Polish14351473Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: multi-turn14221481Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: longer queries14181475Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: writing and language14071470Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14071456Gemini 3.6 Flash
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1295Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1357Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1312Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1289Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1278Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1456Only Gemini 3.6 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Gemini 3.6 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGemini 3.6 FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.0005Fits in one request
Gemini 3.6 Flash$0.0026Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.015Fits in one request
Gemini 3.6 Flash$0.049Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.058Exceeds the context window
Gemini 3.6 Flash$0.188Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Gemini 3.6 Flash
SpecificationDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGoogle Gemini 3.6 Flash
MakerDeepSeekGoogle
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 29, 2025July 21, 2026
Context window164K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.27$0.75
Output $/Mtok$0.41$3.75
Coding indexNot benchmarked62.5
Independent measurements behind it14
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.49
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3.2 Exp better than Gemini 3.6 Flash for coding?

Only Gemini 3.6 Flash has a coding score, 62.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; DeepSeek V3.2 Exp has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick DeepSeek V3.2 Exp for output tokens 9.1x cheaper ($0.41 vs $3.75 per million).

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or Gemini 3.6 Flash?

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs $0.27 per million input tokens and $0.41 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.6 Flash costs $0.75 and $3.75. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.6 Flash only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or Gemini 3.6 Flash?

Gemini 3.6 Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Gemini 3.6 Flash comparison based on?

44 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V3.2 Exp's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Gemini 3.6 Flash's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next