Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Gemini 3.5 Flash

Gemini 3.5 Flash leads DeepSeek V3.2 Exp on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 33.6 to 16.6, and DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs 22.0x less per output token ($0.41 vs $9.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 48 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V3.2 ExpDeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.41
0
Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle
Coding
39.8
Overall
63.8
Output $/M
$9.00
48
vs boards won of 48 shared

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or Gemini 3.5 Flash: which to pick

Only Gemini 3.5 Flash has a coding score, 39.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; DeepSeek V3.2 Exp has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick DeepSeek V3.2 Exp for output tokens 22.0x cheaper ($0.41 vs $9.00 per million).

Shared results
48
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp only
11
Gemini 3.5 Flash only
64
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp not benchmarked, Gemini 3.5 Flash 39.8 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 61.7 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: DeepSeek V3.2 Exp 33.9% against Gemini 3.5 Flash 95.6%, 61.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp $0.41 against Gemini 3.5 Flash $9.00 per million output tokens, 22.0x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp takes 164K tokens, Gemini 3.5 Flash 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V3.2 ExpBarsGemini 3.5 FlashTies
Coding06
Intelligence02
Agentic work01
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
Web design07
General021
All shared boards048
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index06
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Gemini 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGemini 3.5 FlashLeader
Aider polyglot74.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena WebDev12721499Gemini 3.5 Flash
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured87.6%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured78.8%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured6.1%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured48.7%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured26.8%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured74.2%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured52.7%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)78.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
SciCodeNot measured53.9%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)31.1%46.2%Gemini 3.5 Flash
WeirdML39.5%62.6%Gemini 3.5 Flash
ALE-BenchNot measured911.0Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding14381493Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: software and IT14381494Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1495Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML12811522Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1504Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SciCodeNot measured12.3%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Gemini 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGemini 3.5 FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index16.633.6Gemini 3.5 Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index144.9154.9Gemini 3.5 Flash
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Gemini 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGemini 3.5 FlashLeader
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1202Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1197Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1174Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1185Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1098Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1180Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1093Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1154Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured57.9%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured21.6%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured30.8%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured63.5%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured5.7%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
τ²-Bench Telecom33.9%95.6%Gemini 3.5 Flash
APEX-AgentsNot measured27.5%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
TheAgentCompany42.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$5,396Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)56.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Gemini 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGemini 3.5 FlashLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured92.7%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured88.3%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)79.7%92.2%Gemini 3.5 Flash
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)14.9%42.7%Gemini 3.5 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured92.8%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
ARC-AGINot measured92.5%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured72.1%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SimpleBenchNot measured76.7%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured45.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured32.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
EBR-benchNot measured4.8%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14291488Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: expert14221495Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14441483Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1323Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1330Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Gemini 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGemini 3.5 FlashLeader
AA Math Index87.7Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)87.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured95.6%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured62.8%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured26.8%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
ProofBenchNot measured31.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: math14221504Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: mathematical work14331495Gemini 3.5 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Gemini 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGemini 3.5 FlashLeader
MMLU ProNot measured89.5%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.6%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured64.7%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured74.4%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured68.1%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured55.8%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)85.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured66.2%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: science14431495Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14681483Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: legal and government14191488Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: business and finance14121467Gemini 3.5 Flash
FACTS Benchmark SuiteNot measured63.1%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Gemini 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGemini 3.5 FlashLeader
Design Arena: websites11781267Gemini 3.5 Flash
Design Arena: UI components11641269Gemini 3.5 Flash
Design Arena: game dev11441263Gemini 3.5 Flash
Design Arena: data viz11521236Gemini 3.5 Flash
Design Arena: 3D11481243Gemini 3.5 Flash
Design Arena: all code categories11701266Gemini 3.5 Flash
Design Arena: SVG10311253Gemini 3.5 Flash
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1254Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index021
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Gemini 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGemini 3.5 FlashLeader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured59.5%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured49.9%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured76.6%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured62.9%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
IFBench54.1%76.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)72.3%74.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash
DTBench87.7%94.7%Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMCA29.1%47.1%Gemini 3.5 Flash
Fiction.LiveBench83.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
CL-bench13.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured58.1%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
CL-bench Life9.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text14251482Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: instruction following14011467Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: creative writing14041470Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena VisionNot measured1308Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: English14411481Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: non-English14041475Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Chinese14611527Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: German14401494Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Japanese13311486Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Korean13721448Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: French14341490Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Spanish14411480Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Russian14121493Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Polish14351516Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: multi-turn14221481Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: longer queries14181483Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: writing and language14071478Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14071459Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1305Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1377Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1317Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1321Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1301Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1463Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Gemini 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGemini 3.5 FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.0005Fits in one request
Gemini 3.5 Flash$0.0060Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.015Fits in one request
Gemini 3.5 Flash$0.102Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.058Exceeds the context window
Gemini 3.5 Flash$0.390Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Gemini 3.5 Flash
SpecificationDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGoogle Gemini 3.5 Flash
MakerDeepSeekGoogle
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 29, 2025May 19, 2026
Context window164K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.27$1.50
Output $/Mtok$0.41$9.00
Coding indexNot benchmarked39.8
Independent measurements behind it14
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.21
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3.2 Exp better than Gemini 3.5 Flash for coding?

Only Gemini 3.5 Flash has a coding score, 39.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; DeepSeek V3.2 Exp has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick DeepSeek V3.2 Exp for output tokens 22.0x cheaper ($0.41 vs $9.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or Gemini 3.5 Flash?

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs $0.27 per million input tokens and $0.41 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash costs $1.50 and $9.00. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.5 Flash only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Gemini 3.5 Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Gemini 3.5 Flash comparison based on?

48 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V3.2 Exp's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Gemini 3.5 Flash's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next