Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs MiniMax M3

MiniMax M3 leads DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 29.2 to 14.8, at about the same output price ($1.20 vs $1.0142 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 40 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V3.1 TerminusDeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.0142
6
MiniMax M3MiniMax
Coding
39.2
Overall
51.7
Output $/M
$1.20
34
vs boards won of 40 shared

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or MiniMax M3: which to pick

Only MiniMax M3 has a coding score, 39.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus for output tokens 1.2x cheaper ($1.0142 vs $1.20 per million) and work measured by ALE-Bench or LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare, where it leads.

Shared results
40
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus only
5
MiniMax M3 only
76
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus not benchmarked, MiniMax M3 39.2 from 6 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 37.2 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus 37.1% against MiniMax M3 88.9%, 51.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus $1.0142 against MiniMax M3 $1.20 per million output tokens, 1.2x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus takes 164K tokens, MiniMax M3 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusBarsMiniMax M3Ties
Coding15
Intelligence01
Agentic work02
Reasoning04
Math01
Knowledge22
Web design07
General312
All shared boards634
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index15
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusMiniMax M3Leader
LiveBench codingNot measured70.9%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1482Only MiniMax M3 measured
AA Coding Index43.558.6MiniMax M3
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured82.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured75.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured1.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured47.6%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured19.9%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured53.6%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured33.3%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured9.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured51.5%Only MiniMax M3 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured65.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)79.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
SciCode38.0%47.1%MiniMax M3
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)31.8%42.4%MiniMax M3
FrontierCodeNot measured14.7%Only MiniMax M3 measured
ALE-Bench745.2640.0DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LMArena Text: coding14251470MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: software and IT14261466MiniMax M3
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1478Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1455Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1470Only MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusMiniMax M3Leader
AA Intelligence Index14.829.2MiniMax M3
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured146.9Only MiniMax M3 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusMiniMax M3Leader
AA Agentic Index6.829.5MiniMax M3
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1200Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1197Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1169Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1159Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1159Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1130Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1181Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1039Only MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured68.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured8.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured12.4%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured48.3%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured20.6%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured29.8%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured47.8%Only MiniMax M3 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom37.1%88.9%MiniMax M3
APEX-AgentsNot measured37.7%Only MiniMax M3 measured
OSWorld 2.0Not measured4.6%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$2,158Only MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusMiniMax M3Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured92.7%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured74.5%Only MiniMax M3 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured81.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)79.2%92.9%MiniMax M3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)16.4%39.0%MiniMax M3
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured90.9%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SimpleBenchNot measured45.8%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured13.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured8.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14261447MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1461Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14321455MiniMax M3
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1266Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1268Only MiniMax M3 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusMiniMax M3Leader
AA Math Index89.7Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)89.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured71.1%Only MiniMax M3 measured
ProofBenchNot measured18.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: math14021429MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1448Only MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusMiniMax M3Leader
MMLU ProNot measured84.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.4%Only MiniMax M3 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured68.1%Only MiniMax M3 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured72.7%Only MiniMax M3 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured68.4%Only MiniMax M3 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured46.3%Only MiniMax M3 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)85.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: science14511452MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14681441DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LMArena Text: legal and government14571437DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LMArena Text: business and finance14141434MiniMax M3
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusMiniMax M3Leader
Design Arena: websites11871257MiniMax M3
Design Arena: UI components11801243MiniMax M3
Design Arena: game dev11311211MiniMax M3
Design Arena: data viz11681236MiniMax M3
Design Arena: 3D11411208MiniMax M3
Design Arena: all code categories11751246MiniMax M3
Design Arena: SVG10651160MiniMax M3
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1161Only MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench designNot measured66.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index312
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusMiniMax M3Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured76.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured64.1%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured50.6%Only MiniMax M3 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured87.3%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured60.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
IFBench57.0%82.9%MiniMax M3
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)69.3%83.0%MiniMax M3
DTBench81.3%78.9%DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LMCA28.6%33.7%MiniMax M3
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured55.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text14191433MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: instruction following14041433MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: creative writing14031404MiniMax M3
LMArena VisionNot measured1251Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: English14291443MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: non-English14081420MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1466Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1428Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1380Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1373Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1444Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1433Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: Russian14351426DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LMArena Text: Polish14271423DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LMArena Text: multi-turn14111443MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: longer queries14221446MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: writing and language14091419MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13911403MiniMax M3
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1263Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1311Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1259Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1235Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1197Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1234Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1435Only MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusMiniMax M3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus$0.0008Fits in one request
MiniMax M3$0.0009Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus$0.018Fits in one request
MiniMax M3$0.019Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus$0.071Exceeds the context window
MiniMax M3$0.072Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and MiniMax M3
SpecificationDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusMiniMax M3
MakerDeepSeekMiniMax
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 22, 2025May 31, 2026
Context window164K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.3063$0.30
Output $/Mtok$1.0142$1.20
Coding indexNot benchmarked39.2
Independent measurements behind it06
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.56
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus better than MiniMax M3 for coding?

Only MiniMax M3 has a coding score, 39.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus for output tokens 1.2x cheaper ($1.0142 vs $1.20 per million) and work measured by ALE-Bench or LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or MiniMax M3?

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus costs $0.3063 per million input tokens and $1.0142 per million output tokens; MiniMax M3 costs $0.30 and $1.20. Cost per solved task is known for MiniMax M3 only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or MiniMax M3?

MiniMax M3, with 1.05M tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs MiniMax M3 comparison based on?

40 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and MiniMax M3's on 6. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next