Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 22.2 to 14.8, and DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus costs 2.5x less per output token ($1.0142 vs $2.50 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 30 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V3.1 TerminusDeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.0142
3
Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogle
Coding
49.0
Overall
49.8
Output $/M
$2.50
27
vs boards won of 30 shared

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: which to pick

Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has a coding score, 49.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus for output tokens 2.5x cheaper ($1.0142 vs $2.50 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: science or LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare, where it leads.

Shared results
30
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus only
15
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite only
55
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus not benchmarked, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 49.0 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 7.5 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
LMCA: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus 28.6% against Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 37.6%, 9.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus $1.0142 against Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite $2.50 per million output tokens, 2.5x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus takes 164K tokens, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusBarsGemini 3.5 Flash LiteTies
Coding05
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning04
Math01
Knowledge31
General014
All shared boards327
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index05
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusGemini 3.5 Flash LiteLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1435Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
AA Coding Index43.549.3Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured79.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured75.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured37.2%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured6.2%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured50.2%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured59.1%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)79.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
SciCode38.0%41.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)31.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
WeirdMLNot measured39.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ALE-Bench745.2765.3Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: coding14251453Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: software and IT14261451Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1408Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1448Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
SciCodeNot measured6.2%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusGemini 3.5 Flash LiteLeader
AA Intelligence Index14.822.2Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured144.9Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusGemini 3.5 Flash LiteLeader
AA Agentic Index6.814.3Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured47.4%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured7.2%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured13.9%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured43.2%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
τ²-Bench Telecom37.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured29.3%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusGemini 3.5 Flash LiteLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured83.8%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured83.6%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)79.2%83.8%Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)16.4%18.8%Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured83.3%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ARC-AGINot measured53.5%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured10.3%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured21.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured19.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14261441Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1434Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14321440Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1284Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1291Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusGemini 3.5 Flash LiteLeader
AA Math Index89.7Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)89.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured71.1%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured26.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured0.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ProofBenchNot measured13.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: math14021434Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1433Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index31
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusGemini 3.5 Flash LiteLeader
MMLU ProNot measured85.8%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured84.1%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured60.7%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured72.6%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured68.7%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured43.5%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)85.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
LMArena Text: science14511451DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14681438DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LMArena Text: legal and government14571431DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LMArena Text: business and finance14141423Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
FACTS Benchmark SuiteNot measured53.5%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusGemini 3.5 Flash LiteLeader
Design Arena: websites1187Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Design Arena: UI components1182Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Design Arena: game dev1131Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Design Arena: data viz1167Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Design Arena: 3D1141Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Design Arena: all code categories1175Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Design Arena: SVG1065Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index014
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusGemini 3.5 Flash LiteLeader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured51.8%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured47.3%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured70.9%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
IFBench57.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)69.3%76.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
DTBench81.3%83.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMCA28.6%37.6%Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text14191435Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: instruction following14041419Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: creative writing14031421Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena VisionNot measured1269Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: English14291438Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: non-English14081427Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1468Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1454Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1426Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1407Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1451Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1441Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: Russian14351443Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: Polish14271437Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: multi-turn14111445Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: longer queries14221435Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: writing and language14091428Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13911414Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1269Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1311Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1280Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1287Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1260Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusGemini 3.5 Flash LiteLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus$0.0008Fits in one request
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite$0.0015Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus$0.018Fits in one request
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite$0.022Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus$0.071Exceeds the context window
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite$0.085Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
SpecificationDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusGoogle Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
MakerDeepSeekGoogle
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 22, 2025July 21, 2026
Context window164K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.3063$0.30
Output $/Mtok$1.0142$2.50
Coding indexNot benchmarked49.0
Independent measurements behind it03
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.41
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus better than Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite for coding?

Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has a coding score, 49.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus for output tokens 2.5x cheaper ($1.0142 vs $2.50 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: science or LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus costs $0.3063 per million input tokens and $1.0142 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs $0.30 and $2.50. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite, with 1.05M tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite comparison based on?

30 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next