LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

R1 0528 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

Updated October 21, 2026. 43 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

R1 0528DeepSeek
Coding
71.4
Overall
13.1
Output $/M
$2.15
0
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
Coding
77.2
Overall
24.7
Output $/M
$0.525
43
vs boards won of 43 shared

Decision reading

Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash for coding: it scores 77.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 71.4 for R1 0528.

R1 0528 is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Shared results
43
R1 0528 only
16
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash only
58
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
R1 0528 71.4 from 1 benchmark, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 77.2 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Reasoning, 31.7 points apart on average over 7 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
ARC-AGI: R1 0528 21.2% against DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 94.5%, 73.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
R1 0528 $2.15 against DeepSeek V4.1 Flash $0.525 per million output tokens, 4.1x apart.
Context window
R1 0528 takes 164K tokens, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryR1 0528BarsDeepSeek V4.1 FlashTies
Coding03
Intelligence01
Reasoning07
Math03
Knowledge04
Web design07
General018
All shared boards043
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for R1 0528 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
BenchmarkR1 0528DeepSeek V4.1 FlashLeader
Aider polyglot71.4%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LiveBench codingNot measured90.2%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1618Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured19.7%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured84.7%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured45.6%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured40.3%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured74.5%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured46.5%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured16.4%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.8%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured73.7%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)77.0%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
SciCodeNot measured51.9%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)15.9%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
FrontierCodeNot measured43.9%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
WeirdML41.6%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
ALE-Bench804.11092.3DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: coding14271502DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: software and IT14351496DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1628Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1612Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1606Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for R1 0528 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
BenchmarkR1 0528DeepSeek V4.1 FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index13.124.7DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured155.9Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for R1 0528 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
BenchmarkR1 0528DeepSeek V4.1 FlashLeader
LiveBench researchNot measured86.8%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LiveBench browserNot measured84.0%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured40.1%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.8%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured53.5%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured26.6%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured41.4%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured57.2%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured67.8%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured29.6%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
τ²-Bench Telecom36.5%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured39.5%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
METR time horizons53.8%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
DeepResearch Bench35.1%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
Reasoning benchmarks for R1 0528 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
BenchmarkR1 0528DeepSeek V4.1 FlashLeader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured86.7%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured21.2%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)81.3%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)15.8%39.2%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)76.3%89.8%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
ARC-AGI21.2%94.5%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
ARC-AGI-21.1%72.9%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
SimpleBench40.8%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured48.0%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured43.0%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14151483DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: expert13941501DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14221488DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1297Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1307Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Math benchmarks for R1 0528 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
BenchmarkR1 0528DeepSeek V4.1 FlashLeader
AA Math Index76.0Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)76.0%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
OTIS Mock AIME66.4%98.3%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured67.4%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured26.8%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
ProofBenchNot measured54.0%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
MATH level 596.6%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
LMArena Text: math14001478DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: mathematical work14151485DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for R1 0528 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
BenchmarkR1 0528DeepSeek V4.1 FlashLeader
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.3%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured41.2%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)84.9%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured42.9%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: science14301469DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14451484DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: legal and government14191443DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: business and finance14021461DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
Web design benchmarks for R1 0528 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
BenchmarkR1 0528DeepSeek V4.1 FlashLeader
Design Arena: websites11491309DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Design Arena: UI components11021314DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Design Arena: game dev10981331DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Design Arena: data viz11821290DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Design Arena: 3D11111356DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Design Arena: all code categories11391320DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Design Arena: SVG10381243DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1265Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LiveBench designNot measured79.2%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index018
General benchmarks for R1 0528 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
BenchmarkR1 0528DeepSeek V4.1 FlashLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured79.3%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured64.3%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured47.9%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured85.5%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
IFBench39.6%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)55.7%84.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
DTBenchNot measured89.9%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMCANot measured47.0%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Fiction.LiveBench75.0%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)81.9%Not measuredOnly R1 0528 measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured46.3%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured34.2%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text14281464DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: instruction following13821473DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: creative writing14051437DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena VisionNot measured1278Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: English14371473DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: non-English14121449DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: Chinese14421501DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: German14041470DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: Japanese13911432DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: Korean13601436DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: French14171465DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: Spanish14111459DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: Russian14231467DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: Polish14281457DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: multi-turn14051461DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: longer queries13911473DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: writing and language14021450DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14001445DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1288Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1327Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1282Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1260Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1275Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for R1 0528 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
BenchmarkR1 0528DeepSeek V4.1 FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

R1 0528$0.0016Fits in one request
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash$0.0003Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

R1 0528$0.031Fits in one request
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash$0.0040Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

R1 0528$0.121Exceeds the context window
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash$0.015Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of R1 0528 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
SpecificationDeepSeek R1 0528DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
MakerDeepSeekDeepSeek
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedMay 28, 2025September 10, 2026
Context window164K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.50$0.049
Output $/Mtok$2.15$0.525
Coding index71.477.2
Independent measurements behind it12
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is R1 0528 better than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash for coding?

Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash for coding: it scores 77.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 71.4 for R1 0528. R1 0528 is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Which is cheaper, R1 0528 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?

R1 0528 costs $0.50 per million input tokens and $2.15 per million output tokens; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs $0.049 and $0.525. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, R1 0528 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks is the R1 0528 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash comparison based on?

43 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. R1 0528's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next