Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3.1 vs Grok 4.5

Grok 4.5 leads DeepSeek V3.1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 38.8 to 13.7, and DeepSeek V3.1 costs 4.0x less per output token ($1.50 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 11 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V3.1DeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
0
Grok 4.5xAI
Coding
58.6
Overall
62.1
Output $/M
$6.00
11
vs boards won of 11 shared

DeepSeek V3.1 or Grok 4.5: which to pick

Only Grok 4.5 has a coding score, 58.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; DeepSeek V3.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick DeepSeek V3.1 for output tokens 4.0x cheaper ($1.50 vs $6.00 per million).

Shared results
11
DeepSeek V3.1 only
0
Grok 4.5 only
112
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3.1 not benchmarked, Grok 4.5 58.6 from 6 benchmarks.
Widest category
Reasoning, 30.3 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: SVG: DeepSeek V3.1 967 against Grok 4.5 1215, 31.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V3.1 $1.50 against Grok 4.5 $6.00 per million output tokens, 4.0x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3.1 takes 164K tokens, Grok 4.5 500K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V3.1BarsGrok 4.5Ties
Intelligence01
Reasoning01
Web design07
General02
All shared boards011
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index23 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Grok 4.5
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Grok 4.5Leader
LiveBench codingNot measured94.3%Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1553Only Grok 4.5 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured72.4Only Grok 4.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured87.3%Only Grok 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured86.6%Only Grok 4.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured8.6%Only Grok 4.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured69.0%Only Grok 4.5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured36.6%Only Grok 4.5 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Grok 4.5 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured40.6%Only Grok 4.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured67.8%Only Grok 4.5 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured66.0%Only Grok 4.5 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured71.0%Only Grok 4.5 measured
SciCodeNot measured55.0%Only Grok 4.5 measured
FrontierCodeNot measured42.4%Only Grok 4.5 measured
WeirdMLNot measured46.4%Only Grok 4.5 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1309.3Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1474Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1471Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1556Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1567Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1562Only Grok 4.5 measured
SciCodeNot measured6.5%Only Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Grok 4.5
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Grok 4.5Leader
AA Intelligence Index13.738.8Grok 4.5
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured154.1Only Grok 4.5 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Grok 4.5
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Grok 4.5Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured41.2Only Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1218Only Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1249Only Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1220Only Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1236Only Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1229Only Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1236Only Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1205Only Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1230Only Grok 4.5 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured85.9%Only Grok 4.5 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured44.0%Only Grok 4.5 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured27.9%Only Grok 4.5 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.8%Only Grok 4.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured48.4%Only Grok 4.5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured24.9%Only Grok 4.5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.0%Only Grok 4.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured52.9%Only Grok 4.5 measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)Not measured6.3%Only Grok 4.5 measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured56.2%Only Grok 4.5 measured
PostTrainBenchNot measured23.4%Only Grok 4.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$3,887Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena SearchNot measured1216Only Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Grok 4.5
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Grok 4.5Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured92.9%Only Grok 4.5 measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured87.2%Only Grok 4.5 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured61.8%Only Grok 4.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured93.1%Only Grok 4.5 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured42.7%Only Grok 4.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured93.4%Only Grok 4.5 measured
ARC-AGINot measured87.2%Only Grok 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured52.6%Only Grok 4.5 measured
SimpleBenchNot measured70.0%Only Grok 4.5 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured35.0%Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1462Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1465Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1464Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1304Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1295Only Grok 4.5 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark53.2%83.5%Grok 4.5
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Grok 4.5
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Grok 4.5Leader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured97.8%Only Grok 4.5 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured57.2%Only Grok 4.5 measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured24.4%Only Grok 4.5 measured
ProofBenchNot measured31.0%Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1460Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1482Only Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Grok 4.5
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Grok 4.5Leader
MMLU ProNot measured89.2%Only Grok 4.5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured86.0%Only Grok 4.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured67.4%Only Grok 4.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured71.7%Only Grok 4.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured61.8%Only Grok 4.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured43.3%Only Grok 4.5 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured48.3%Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1464Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1440Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1463Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1441Only Grok 4.5 measured
FACTS Benchmark SuiteNot measured50.2%Only Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Grok 4.5
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Grok 4.5Leader
Design Arena: websites11221281Grok 4.5
Design Arena: UI components10851280Grok 4.5
Design Arena: game dev10841264Grok 4.5
Design Arena: data viz10961266Grok 4.5
Design Arena: 3D10771257Grok 4.5
Design Arena: all code categories11121275Grok 4.5
Design Arena: SVG9671215Grok 4.5
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1256Only Grok 4.5 measured
LiveBench designNot measured78.1%Only Grok 4.5 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Grok 4.5
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Grok 4.5Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured73.0%Only Grok 4.5 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured35.0%Only Grok 4.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured86.9%Only Grok 4.5 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured63.4%Only Grok 4.5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured79.3%Only Grok 4.5 measured
DTBench82.7%96.5%Grok 4.5
LMCA24.3%45.2%Grok 4.5
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured74.4%Only Grok 4.5 measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured22.5%Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1448Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1445Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1442Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1287Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1453Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1440Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1495Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1448Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1430Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1406Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1457Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1451Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1449Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1432Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1456Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1462Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1445Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1434Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1285Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1345Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1293Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1276Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1293Only Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1452Only Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Grok 4.5
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Grok 4.5Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3.1$0.0013Fits in one request
Grok 4.5$0.0050Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.1 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.1$0.032Fits in one request
Grok 4.5$0.118Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.1 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.1$0.125Exceeds the context window
Grok 4.5$0.460Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.1 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3.1 and Grok 4.5
SpecificationDeepSeek V3.1SpaceXAI Grok 4.5
MakerDeepSeekxAI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 21, 2025July 8, 2026
Context window164K500K
Input $/Mtok$0.55$2.00
Output $/Mtok$1.50$6.00
Coding indexNot benchmarked58.6
Independent measurements behind it06
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.62
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3.1 better than Grok 4.5 for coding?

Only Grok 4.5 has a coding score, 58.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; DeepSeek V3.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick DeepSeek V3.1 for output tokens 4.0x cheaper ($1.50 vs $6.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.1 or Grok 4.5?

DeepSeek V3.1 costs $0.55 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; Grok 4.5 costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for Grok 4.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.1 or Grok 4.5?

Grok 4.5, with 500K tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3.1 vs Grok 4.5 comparison based on?

11 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V3.1's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Grok 4.5's on 6. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next