Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Command R (08-2024) vs Muse Spark 1.2

Command R (08-2024) costs 7.1x less per output token than Muse Spark 1.2 ($0.60 vs $4.25 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 23 benchmarks have a result for both.

Command R (08-2024)Cohere
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
0
Muse Spark 1.2Meta
Coding
55.7
Overall
60.4
Output $/M
$4.25
23
vs boards won of 23 shared

Command R (08-2024) or Muse Spark 1.2: which to pick

Only Muse Spark 1.2 has a coding score, 55.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Command R (08-2024) has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Command R (08-2024) for output tokens 7.1x cheaper ($0.60 vs $4.25 per million).

Shared results
23
Command R (08-2024) only
2
Muse Spark 1.2 only
74
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Command R (08-2024) not benchmarked, Muse Spark 1.2 55.7 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 52.2 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: coding: Command R (08-2024) 1187 against Muse Spark 1.2 1505, 53.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Command R (08-2024) $0.60 against Muse Spark 1.2 $4.25 per million output tokens, 7.1x apart.
Context window
Command R (08-2024) takes 128K tokens, Muse Spark 1.2 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryCommand R (08-2024)BarsMuse Spark 1.2Ties
Coding02
Reasoning03
Math02
Knowledge04
General012
All shared boards023
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Muse Spark 1.2Leader
LiveBench codingNot measured78.2%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1534Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured72.2Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured86.6%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured6.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured79.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured29.9%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured21.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured69.7%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured53.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SciCodeNot measured57.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
FrontierSWENot measured12.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
WeirdMLNot measured60.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: coding11871505Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: software and IT11971505Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1526Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1543Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Muse Spark 1.2Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured39.6Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured155.1Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index18 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Muse Spark 1.2Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured43.2Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1221Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1210Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1181Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1222Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1179Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1085Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1172Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured67.7%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured36.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured21.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured60.6%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured32.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured43.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured57.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured64.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured45.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Muse Spark 1.2Leader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured90.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured86.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured90.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured45.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SimpleBenchNot measured74.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured27.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts11861489Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: expert11731475Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English11941487Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1317Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Muse Spark 1.2Leader
ProofBenchNot measured43.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: math11881484Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: mathematical work11981480Muse Spark 1.2
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Muse Spark 1.2Leader
MMLU ProNot measured88.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured70.9%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured80.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured65.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured49.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured60.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: science12521500Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12381496Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: legal and government12681517Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: business and finance12151484Muse Spark 1.2
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Muse Spark 1.2Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1312Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1298Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1301Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1334Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1301Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1312Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1284Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1284Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench designNot measured67.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index012
General benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Muse Spark 1.2Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured76.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured68.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured47.7%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured90.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured69.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured79.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
DTBenchNot measured94.7%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMCANot measured48.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text12291482Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: instruction following11971462Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: creative writing12341436Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena VisionNot measured1304Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: English12381483Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: non-English12161476Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: Chinese12271509Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: German1216Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1166Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: Korean11621462Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1495Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1484Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: Russian12271483Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: multi-turn12131502Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: longer queries12301473Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: writing and language12411453Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12231443Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1291Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1313Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Muse Spark 1.2Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Command R (08-2024)$0.0004Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.2$0.0034Fits in one request

Command R (08-2024) costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Command R (08-2024)$0.0093Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.2$0.075Fits in one request

Command R (08-2024) costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Command R (08-2024)$0.036Exceeds the context window
Muse Spark 1.2$0.292Fits in one request

Command R (08-2024) costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Command R (08-2024) and Muse Spark 1.2
SpecificationCohere Command R (08-2024)Meta Muse Spark 1.2
MakerCohereMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 30, 2024August 5, 2026
Context window128K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.15$1.25
Output $/Mtok$0.60$4.25
Coding indexNot benchmarked55.7
Independent measurements behind it05
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.64
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Command R (08-2024) better than Muse Spark 1.2 for coding?

Only Muse Spark 1.2 has a coding score, 55.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Command R (08-2024) has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Command R (08-2024) for output tokens 7.1x cheaper ($0.60 vs $4.25 per million).

Which is cheaper, Command R (08-2024) or Muse Spark 1.2?

Command R (08-2024) costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.2 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for Muse Spark 1.2 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Command R (08-2024) or Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Command R (08-2024) vs Muse Spark 1.2 comparison based on?

23 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Command R (08-2024)'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark 1.2's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next