Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Command R (08-2024) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash

Command R (08-2024) costs 15.0x less per output token than Gemini 3.5 Flash ($0.60 vs $9.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 25 benchmarks have a result for both.

Command R (08-2024)Cohere
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
0
Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle
Coding
39.8
Overall
63.8
Output $/M
$9.00
25
vs boards won of 25 shared

Command R (08-2024) or Gemini 3.5 Flash: which to pick

Only Gemini 3.5 Flash has a coding score, 39.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; Command R (08-2024) has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Command R (08-2024) for output tokens 15.0x cheaper ($0.60 vs $9.00 per million).

Shared results
25
Command R (08-2024) only
0
Gemini 3.5 Flash only
87
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Command R (08-2024) not benchmarked, Gemini 3.5 Flash 39.8 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 51.1 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: expert: Command R (08-2024) 1173 against Gemini 3.5 Flash 1495, 53.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Command R (08-2024) $0.60 against Gemini 3.5 Flash $9.00 per million output tokens, 15.0x apart.
Context window
Command R (08-2024) takes 128K tokens, Gemini 3.5 Flash 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryCommand R (08-2024)BarsGemini 3.5 FlashTies
Coding02
Reasoning03
Math02
Knowledge04
General014
All shared boards025
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Gemini 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Gemini 3.5 FlashLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1499Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured87.6%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured78.8%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured6.1%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured48.7%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured26.8%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured74.2%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured52.7%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SciCodeNot measured53.9%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured46.2%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
WeirdMLNot measured62.6%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
ALE-BenchNot measured911.0Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding11871493Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: software and IT11971494Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1495Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1522Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1504Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SciCodeNot measured12.3%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Gemini 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Gemini 3.5 FlashLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured33.6Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured154.9Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index16 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Gemini 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Gemini 3.5 FlashLeader
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1202Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1197Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1174Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1184Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1098Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1180Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1142Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1179Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured57.9%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured21.6%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured30.8%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured63.5%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured5.7%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured95.6%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured27.5%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$5,396Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Gemini 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Gemini 3.5 FlashLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured92.7%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured88.3%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured92.2%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured42.7%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured92.8%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
ARC-AGINot measured92.5%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured72.1%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SimpleBenchNot measured76.7%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured45.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured32.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
EBR-benchNot measured4.8%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts11861488Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: expert11731495Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English11941483Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1323Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1330Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Gemini 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Gemini 3.5 FlashLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured95.6%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured62.8%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured26.8%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
ProofBenchNot measured31.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: math11881504Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: mathematical work11981495Gemini 3.5 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Gemini 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Gemini 3.5 FlashLeader
MMLU ProNot measured89.5%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.6%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured64.7%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured74.4%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured68.1%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured55.8%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured66.2%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: science12521495Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12381483Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: legal and government12681488Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: business and finance12151467Gemini 3.5 Flash
FACTS Benchmark SuiteNot measured63.1%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Gemini 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Gemini 3.5 FlashLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1268Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1273Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1263Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1236Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1244Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1266Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1254Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1254Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index014
General benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Gemini 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Gemini 3.5 FlashLeader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured59.5%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured49.9%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured76.6%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured62.9%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
IFBenchNot measured76.3%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured74.3%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
DTBenchNot measured94.7%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMCANot measured47.1%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured58.1%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text12291482Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: instruction following11971467Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: creative writing12341470Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena VisionNot measured1308Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: English12381481Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: non-English12161475Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Chinese12271527Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: German12161494Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Japanese11661486Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Korean11621448Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1490Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1480Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Russian12271493Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1516Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn12131481Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: longer queries12301483Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: writing and language12411478Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12231459Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1305Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1377Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1317Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1321Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1301Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1463Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and Gemini 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)Gemini 3.5 FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Command R (08-2024)$0.0004Fits in one request
Gemini 3.5 Flash$0.0060Fits in one request

Command R (08-2024) costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Command R (08-2024)$0.0093Fits in one request
Gemini 3.5 Flash$0.102Fits in one request

Command R (08-2024) costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Command R (08-2024)$0.036Exceeds the context window
Gemini 3.5 Flash$0.390Fits in one request

Command R (08-2024) costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Command R (08-2024) and Gemini 3.5 Flash
SpecificationCohere Command R (08-2024)Google Gemini 3.5 Flash
MakerCohereGoogle
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 30, 2024May 19, 2026
Context window128K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.15$1.50
Output $/Mtok$0.60$9.00
Coding indexNot benchmarked39.8
Independent measurements behind it04
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.21
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Command R (08-2024) better than Gemini 3.5 Flash for coding?

Only Gemini 3.5 Flash has a coding score, 39.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; Command R (08-2024) has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Command R (08-2024) for output tokens 15.0x cheaper ($0.60 vs $9.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Command R (08-2024) or Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Command R (08-2024) costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash costs $1.50 and $9.00. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.5 Flash only.

Which has the bigger context window, Command R (08-2024) or Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Gemini 3.5 Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Command R (08-2024) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash comparison based on?

25 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Command R (08-2024)'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Gemini 3.5 Flash's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next