Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Command A vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

Updated October 21, 2026. 44 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Command ACohere
Coding
No data
Overall
13.1
Output $/M
$10.00
1
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGoogle
Coding
22.7
Overall
15.6
Output $/M
$1.50
43
vs boards won of 44 shared

Decision reading

Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview has a coding score, 22.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Command A has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Command A has the edge where the benchmark that matters is CaseLaw (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
44
Command A only
16
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview only
33
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Command A not benchmarked, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 22.7 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 36.2 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
AIME: Command A 13.3% against Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 83.3%, 70.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Command A $10.00 against Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview $1.50 per million output tokens, 6.7x apart.
Context window
Command A takes 256K tokens, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryCommand ABarsGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewTies
Coding06
Intelligence01
Agentic work02
Reasoning04
Math03
Knowledge19
General018
All shared boards143
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index06
Coding benchmarks for Command A and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
BenchmarkCommand AGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1257Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
AA Coding Index27.834.7Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)35.1%80.1%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)7.8%62.8%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured4.6%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)17.6%34.1%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)28.7%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
SciCode38.5%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)25.0%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
ALE-BenchNot measured797.7Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: coding13301400Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: software and IT13361413Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1245Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1276Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1336Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Command A and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
BenchmarkCommand AGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewLeader
AA Intelligence Index13.115.6Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Agentic work benchmarks for Command A and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
BenchmarkCommand AGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewLeader
AA Agentic Index1.01.6Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Finance Agent (Vals AI)9.0%30.0%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured3.1%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured3.4%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured8.6%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
τ²-Bench Telecom80.7%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Reasoning benchmarks for Command A and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
BenchmarkCommand AGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewLeader
GPQA Diamond48.5%81.1%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured82.5%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)76.1%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)12.0%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13261407Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: expert12961398Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13351403Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1242Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1271Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Math benchmarks for Command A and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
BenchmarkCommand AGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewLeader
AIME13.3%83.3%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
MATH 500 (Vals AI)76.2%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
MGSM (Vals AI)85.7%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
AA Math Index13.0Not measuredOnly Command A measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)13.0%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
LMArena Text: math13001428Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: mathematical work13121417Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index19
Knowledge benchmarks for Command A and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
BenchmarkCommand AGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewLeader
MMLU Pro69.2%86.2%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LegalBench (Vals AI)79.7%83.8%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
CaseLaw (Vals AI)64.5%55.0%Command A
CorpFin (Vals AI)46.0%59.4%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
TaxEval (Vals AI)61.4%71.8%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured68.0%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
MedQA (Vals AI)80.5%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
MedCode (Vals AI)19.7%47.6%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)71.2%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
LMArena Text: science13391425Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13341428Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: legal and government13481418Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: business and finance13151389Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Command A and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
BenchmarkCommand AGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1083Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1071Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1029Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1044Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1048Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1072Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1052Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1166Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index018
General benchmarks for Command A and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
BenchmarkCommand AGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured49.5%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)55.7%63.9%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured41.4%Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
IFBench73.9%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)52.7%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
DTBench61.3%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
LMCA10.3%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
LMArena Text13311416Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: instruction following13091377Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: creative writing13191401Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena VisionNot measured1240Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Text: English13441414Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: non-English13131410Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: Chinese13271460Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: German13421430Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: Japanese12851413Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: Korean12851392Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: French13511424Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: Spanish13471421Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: Russian13141420Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: Polish13241443Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: multi-turn13381417Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: longer queries13341394Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: writing and language13281408Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13061386Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1232Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1278Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1246Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1266Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1259Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1308Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1248Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Command A and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
BenchmarkCommand AGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Command A$0.0075Fits in one request
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview$0.0010Fits in one request

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Command A$0.155Fits in one request
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview$0.017Fits in one request

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Command A$0.600Fits in one request
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview$0.065Fits in one request

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Command A and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
SpecificationCohere Command AGoogle Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
MakerCohereGoogle
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedMarch 13, 2025March 3, 2026
Context window256K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$2.50$0.25
Output $/Mtok$10.00$1.50
Coding indexNot benchmarked22.7
Independent measurements behind it13
Cost per solved task$2.69$0.18
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Command A better than Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview for coding?

Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview has a coding score, 22.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Command A has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Command A has the edge where the benchmark that matters is CaseLaw (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Command A or Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview?

Command A costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs $0.25 and $1.50. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Command A costs $2.69 and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview $0.18.

Which has the bigger context window, Command A or Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks is the Command A vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview comparison based on?

44 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Command A's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next