Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Updated October 21, 2026. 48 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic
Coding
63.5
Overall
38.2
Output $/M
$10.00
48
Qwen3.5-122B-A10BQwen
Coding
22.9
Overall
17.7
Output $/M
$2.08
0
vs boards won of 48 shared

Decision reading

Pick Claude Sonnet 5 for coding: it scores 63.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 22.9 for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.

Pick Qwen3.5-122B-A10B when output tokens cost 4.8x less.

Shared results
48
Claude Sonnet 5 only
72
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B only
3
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Sonnet 5 63.5 from 2 benchmarks, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 22.9 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Intelligence, 20.5 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: React: Claude Sonnet 5 1541 against Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 1353, 31.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Sonnet 5 $10.00 against Qwen3.5-122B-A10B $2.08 per million output tokens, 4.8x apart.
Context window
Claude Sonnet 5 takes 1M tokens, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Sonnet 5BarsQwen3.5-122B-A10BTies
Coding70
Intelligence10
Reasoning80
Math20
Knowledge40
General260
All shared boards480
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index70
Coding benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Qwen3.5-122B-A10BLeader
LiveBench coding74.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena WebDev15401361Claude Sonnet 5
AA Coding Index71.543.3Claude Sonnet 5
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)82.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)79.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)10.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)81.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)44.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
IOI (Vals AI)45.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)74.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)13.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)46.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)70.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
SciCode54.3%39.7%Claude Sonnet 5
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured31.1%Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
FrontierCode42.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
GSO-Bench37.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
WeirdML68.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
ALE-Bench1463.1Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: coding14831436Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: software and IT14741436Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena WebDev: React15411353Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena WebDev: HTML15271351Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena WebDev: from an image1540Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Qwen3.5-122B-A10BLeader
AA Intelligence Index38.217.7Claude Sonnet 5
Epoch Capabilities Index156.9Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Qwen3.5-122B-A10BLeader
AA Agentic Index43.6Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1245Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1249Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1215Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1231Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1225Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1227Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1218Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1216Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1004Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LiveBench research82.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LiveBench browser72.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LiveBench long agentic39.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)0.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)53.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)29.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)41.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)66.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)5.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured93.6%Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
APEX-Agents54.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$6,378Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index80
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Qwen3.5-122B-A10BLeader
GPQA Diamond88.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LiveBench reasoning88.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)83.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)91.1%85.7%Claude Sonnet 5
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)41.3%25.2%Claude Sonnet 5
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)90.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
SimpleBench60.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Chess puzzles45.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Mystery game puzzles35.0%17.0%Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: hard prompts14611421Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: expert14891431Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14641431Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Vision: diagrams12931249Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Vision: homework13111261Claude Sonnet 5
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Qwen3.5-122B-A10BLeader
OTIS Mock AIME94.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 365.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
FrontierMath, tier 429.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
ProofBench77.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: math14671431Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: mathematical work14811431Claude Sonnet 5
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Qwen3.5-122B-A10BLeader
MMLU Pro87.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)67.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)75.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)70.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)47.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
SimpleQA Verified33.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: science14601432Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14421423Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: legal and government14541422Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: business and finance14361414Claude Sonnet 5
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Qwen3.5-122B-A10BLeader
Design Arena: websites1274Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1279Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1278Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1251Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1261Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1276Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: SVG1193Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1207Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LiveBench design82.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index260
General benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Qwen3.5-122B-A10BLeader
LiveBench data analysis71.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)66.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)48.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)76.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Vals Multimodal Index68.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
IFBenchNot measured75.7%Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.0%76.3%Claude Sonnet 5
DTBench92.5%84.3%Claude Sonnet 5
LMCA50.0%32.2%Claude Sonnet 5
Surface Evolver Bench60.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text14421417Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: instruction following14521399Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: creative writing14161368Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Vision12731244Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: English14501428Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: non-English14311401Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: Chinese14781463Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: German14421425Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: Japanese14221367Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: Korean14121353Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: French14631443Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: Spanish14381425Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: Russian14501400Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: Polish14251398Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: multi-turn14531416Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: longer queries14621410Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: writing and language14361387Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14111366Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Vision: English12751249Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Vision: Chinese13311301Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Vision: reading text12881251Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Vision: humor12611243Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Vision: creative writing12461220Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Document1466Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Qwen3.5-122B-A10BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Sonnet 5$0.0070Fits in one request
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B$0.0013Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Sonnet 5$0.130Fits in one request
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B$0.019Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Sonnet 5$0.500Fits in one request
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B$0.073Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Sonnet 5 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Sonnet 5Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
MakerAnthropicQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJune 30, 2026February 25, 2026
Context window1M262K
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.26
Output $/Mtok$10.00$2.08
Coding index63.522.9
Independent measurements behind it21
Cost per solved task$1.87Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Sonnet 5 better than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B for coding?

Pick Claude Sonnet 5 for coding: it scores 63.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 22.9 for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B. Pick Qwen3.5-122B-A10B when output tokens cost 4.8x less.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Claude Sonnet 5 costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5-122B-A10B costs $0.26 and $2.08. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Sonnet 5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Sonnet 5 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Claude Sonnet 5, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B comparison based on?

48 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Claude Sonnet 5's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next