Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen3 30B A3B

Claude Sonnet 5 leads Qwen3 30B A3B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 38.2 to 7.6, and Qwen3 30B A3B costs 20.0x less per output token ($0.50 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 43 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic
Coding
57.7
Overall
63.2
Output $/M
$10.00
43
Qwen3 30B A3BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
38.2
Output $/M
$0.50
0
vs boards won of 43 shared

Claude Sonnet 5 or Qwen3 30B A3B: which to pick

Only Claude Sonnet 5 has a coding score, 57.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 30B A3B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3 30B A3B for output tokens 20.0x cheaper ($0.50 vs $10.00 per million).

Shared results
43
Claude Sonnet 5 only
78
Qwen3 30B A3B only
9
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Sonnet 5 57.7 from 6 benchmarks, Qwen3 30B A3B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 41.3 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Claude Sonnet 5 82.0% against Qwen3 30B A3B 0.0%, 82.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Sonnet 5 $10.00 against Qwen3 30B A3B $0.50 per million output tokens, 20.0x apart.
Context window
Claude Sonnet 5 takes 1M tokens, Qwen3 30B A3B 41K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Sonnet 5BarsQwen3 30B A3BTies
Coding30
Intelligence20
Reasoning60
Math30
Knowledge40
Web design50
General200
All shared boards430
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index30
Coding benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5 and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Qwen3 30B A3BLeader
LiveBench coding74.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena WebDev1540Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
AA Coding Index71.5Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)82.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)79.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)10.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)81.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)44.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
IOI (Vals AI)45.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)74.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)13.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)46.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)70.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured50.6%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
SciCode54.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured6.8%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
FrontierCode42.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
GSO-Bench37.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
WeirdML68.8%29.8%Claude Sonnet 5
ALE-Bench1463.1Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: coding14831337Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: software and IT14741340Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena WebDev: React1541Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1527Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1540Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
SciCode10.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5 and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Qwen3 30B A3BLeader
AA Intelligence Index38.27.6Claude Sonnet 5
Epoch Capabilities Index156.9137.3Claude Sonnet 5
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5 and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Qwen3 30B A3BLeader
AA Agentic Index43.6Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1245Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1249Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1214Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1227Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1225Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1227Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1168Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1193Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1077Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LiveBench research82.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LiveBench browser72.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LiveBench long agentic39.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)0.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)53.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)29.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)41.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)66.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)5.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured26.0%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
APEX-Agents54.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$6,378Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5 and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Qwen3 30B A3BLeader
GPQA Diamond88.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LiveBench reasoning88.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)83.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)91.1%61.6%Claude Sonnet 5
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)41.3%6.2%Claude Sonnet 5
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)90.5%61.7%Claude Sonnet 5
SimpleBench60.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Chess puzzles45.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Mystery game puzzles35.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14611314Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: expert14891314Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14641329Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Vision: diagrams1293Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1311Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Math benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5 and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Qwen3 30B A3BLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured72.3Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured72.3%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
OTIS Mock AIME94.7%62.8%Claude Sonnet 5
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 365.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
FrontierMath, tier 429.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
ProofBench77.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: math14671355Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: mathematical work14811363Claude Sonnet 5
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5 and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Qwen3 30B A3BLeader
MMLU Pro87.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)67.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)75.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)70.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)47.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured77.7%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
SimpleQA Verified33.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: science14601321Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14421318Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: legal and government14541314Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: business and finance14361309Claude Sonnet 5
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Web design benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5 and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Qwen3 30B A3BLeader
Design Arena: websites1274954Claude Sonnet 5
Design Arena: UI components1277943Claude Sonnet 5
Design Arena: game dev1276898Claude Sonnet 5
Design Arena: data viz1252967Claude Sonnet 5
Design Arena: 3D1260Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1275941Claude Sonnet 5
Design Arena: SVG1192Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1207Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LiveBench design82.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index200
General benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5 and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Qwen3 30B A3BLeader
LiveBench data analysis71.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)66.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)48.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)76.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Vals Multimodal Index68.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
IFBenchNot measured41.5%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.0%0.0%Claude Sonnet 5
DTBench92.5%60.3%Claude Sonnet 5
LMCA50.0%15.8%Claude Sonnet 5
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured40.6%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured75.3%Only Qwen3 30B A3B measured
Surface Evolver Bench60.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text14421317Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: instruction following14521283Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: creative writing14161271Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Vision1273Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: English14501335Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: non-English14311295Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: Chinese14781347Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: German14421307Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: Japanese14221254Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: Korean14121261Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: French14631352Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: Spanish14381317Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: Russian14501291Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: Polish14251299Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: multi-turn14531307Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: longer queries14621312Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: writing and language14361290Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14111258Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Vision: English1275Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1331Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1288Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1261Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1246Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Document1466Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5 and Qwen3 30B A3B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Qwen3 30B A3BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Sonnet 5$0.0070Fits in one request
Qwen3 30B A3B$0.0004Fits in one request

Qwen3 30B A3B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Sonnet 5$0.130Fits in one request
Qwen3 30B A3B$0.0075Exceeds the context window

Qwen3 30B A3B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Sonnet 5$0.500Fits in one request
Qwen3 30B A3B$0.029Exceeds the context window

Qwen3 30B A3B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Sonnet 5 and Qwen3 30B A3B
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Sonnet 5Qwen3 30B A3B
MakerAnthropicQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJune 30, 2026April 28, 2025
Context window1M41K
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.12
Output $/Mtok$10.00$0.50
Coding index57.7Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it60
Cost per solved task$1.87Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Sonnet 5 better than Qwen3 30B A3B for coding?

Only Claude Sonnet 5 has a coding score, 57.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 30B A3B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 30B A3B for output tokens 20.0x cheaper ($0.50 vs $10.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5 or Qwen3 30B A3B?

Claude Sonnet 5 costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3 30B A3B costs $0.12 and $0.50. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Sonnet 5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Sonnet 5 or Qwen3 30B A3B?

Claude Sonnet 5, with 1M tokens against 41K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen3 30B A3B comparison based on?

43 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Sonnet 5's coding index rests on 6 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 30B A3B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next