Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Gemma 3 12B

Claude Sonnet 5 leads Gemma 3 12B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 38.2 to 3.8, and Gemma 3 12B costs 61.5x less per output token ($0.1625 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 35 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic
Coding
57.7
Overall
63.2
Output $/M
$10.00
35
Gemma 3 12BGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
28.0
Output $/M
$0.1625
0
vs boards won of 35 shared

Claude Sonnet 5 or Gemma 3 12B: which to pick

Only Claude Sonnet 5 has a coding score, 57.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemma 3 12B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Gemma 3 12B for output tokens 61.5x cheaper ($0.1625 vs $10.00 per million).

Shared results
35
Claude Sonnet 5 only
86
Gemma 3 12B only
8
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Sonnet 5 57.7 from 6 benchmarks, Gemma 3 12B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 43.5 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: Claude Sonnet 5 94.7% against Gemma 3 12B 16.7%, 78.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Sonnet 5 $10.00 against Gemma 3 12B $0.1625 per million output tokens, 61.5x apart.
Context window
Claude Sonnet 5 takes 1M tokens, Gemma 3 12B 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Sonnet 5BarsGemma 3 12BTies
Coding50
Intelligence20
Agentic work10
Reasoning60
Math30
Knowledge40
General140
All shared boards350
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index50
Coding benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5 and Gemma 3 12B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Gemma 3 12BLeader
LiveBench coding74.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena WebDev1540Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
AA Coding Index71.55.8Claude Sonnet 5
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)82.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)79.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)10.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)81.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)44.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
IOI (Vals AI)45.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)74.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)13.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)46.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)70.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured13.7%Only Gemma 3 12B measured
SciCode54.3%16.4%Claude Sonnet 5
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured0.8%Only Gemma 3 12B measured
FrontierCode42.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
GSO-Bench37.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
WeirdML68.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
ALE-Bench1463.1Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: coding14831281Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: software and IT14741313Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena WebDev: React1541Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1527Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1540Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
SciCode10.7%0.0%Claude Sonnet 5
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5 and Gemma 3 12B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Gemma 3 12BLeader
AA Intelligence Index38.23.8Claude Sonnet 5
Epoch Capabilities Index156.9123.5Claude Sonnet 5
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5 and Gemma 3 12B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Gemma 3 12BLeader
AA Agentic Index43.60.1Claude Sonnet 5
Design Arena: agents building web apps1245Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1249Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1215Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1225Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1225Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1227Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1218Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1216Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1021Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LiveBench research82.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LiveBench browser72.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LiveBench long agentic39.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)0.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)53.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)29.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)41.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)66.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)5.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured10.8%Only Gemma 3 12B measured
APEX-Agents54.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$6,378Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)Not measured30.4%Only Gemma 3 12B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5 and Gemma 3 12B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Gemma 3 12BLeader
GPQA Diamond88.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LiveBench reasoning88.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)83.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)91.1%34.9%Claude Sonnet 5
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)41.3%4.2%Claude Sonnet 5
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)90.5%39.5%Claude Sonnet 5
SimpleBench60.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Chess puzzles45.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Mystery game puzzles35.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14611309Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: expert14891248Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14641318Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Vision: diagrams1293Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1311Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Math benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5 and Gemma 3 12B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Gemma 3 12BLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured18.3Only Gemma 3 12B measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured18.3%Only Gemma 3 12B measured
OTIS Mock AIME94.7%16.7%Claude Sonnet 5
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 365.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
FrontierMath, tier 429.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
ProofBench77.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: math14671307Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: mathematical work14811336Claude Sonnet 5
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5 and Gemma 3 12B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Gemma 3 12BLeader
MMLU Pro87.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)67.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)75.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)70.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)47.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured59.5%Only Gemma 3 12B measured
SimpleQA Verified33.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: science14601366Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14421334Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: legal and government14541381Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: business and finance14361376Claude Sonnet 5
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5 and Gemma 3 12B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Gemma 3 12BLeader
Design Arena: websites1274Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1280Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1278Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1251Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1261Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1276Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: SVG1193Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1207Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LiveBench design82.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index140
General benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5 and Gemma 3 12B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Gemma 3 12BLeader
LiveBench data analysis71.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)66.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)48.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)76.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Vals Multimodal Index68.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
IFBenchNot measured36.7%Only Gemma 3 12B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.0%8.3%Claude Sonnet 5
DTBench92.5%48.8%Claude Sonnet 5
LMCA50.0%4.5%Claude Sonnet 5
Surface Evolver Bench60.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text14421334Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: instruction following14521299Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: creative writing14161331Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Vision1273Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: English14501349Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: non-English14311318Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: Chinese1478Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: German14421370Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: Japanese1422Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1412Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: French1463Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1438Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: Russian14501335Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: Polish1425Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14531334Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: longer queries14621317Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: writing and language14361307Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14111297Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Vision: English1275Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1331Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1288Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1261Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1246Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Document1466Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5 and Gemma 3 12B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5Gemma 3 12BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Sonnet 5$0.0070Fits in one request
Gemma 3 12B$0.0002Fits in one request

Gemma 3 12B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Sonnet 5$0.130Fits in one request
Gemma 3 12B$0.0042Fits in one request

Gemma 3 12B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Sonnet 5$0.500Fits in one request
Gemma 3 12B$0.017Exceeds the context window

Gemma 3 12B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Sonnet 5 and Gemma 3 12B
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Sonnet 5Google Gemma 3 12B
MakerAnthropicGoogle
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJune 30, 2026March 13, 2025
Context window1M131K
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.075
Output $/Mtok$10.00$0.1625
Coding index57.7Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it60
Cost per solved task$1.87Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Sonnet 5 better than Gemma 3 12B for coding?

Only Claude Sonnet 5 has a coding score, 57.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemma 3 12B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemma 3 12B for output tokens 61.5x cheaper ($0.1625 vs $10.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5 or Gemma 3 12B?

Claude Sonnet 5 costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Gemma 3 12B costs $0.075 and $0.1625. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Sonnet 5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Sonnet 5 or Gemma 3 12B?

Claude Sonnet 5, with 1M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Sonnet 5 vs Gemma 3 12B comparison based on?

35 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Claude Sonnet 5's coding index rests on 6 independent benchmarks and Gemma 3 12B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next