LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Updated October 21, 2026. 28 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic
Coding
57.8
Overall
30.1
Output $/M
$15.00
28
R Beam 1.0 501B A23BReflection
Coding
33.8
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.00
0
vs boards won of 28 shared

Decision reading

Pick Claude Sonnet 4.6 for coding: it scores 57.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 33.8 for Beam 1.0 501B A23B.

Pick Beam 1.0 501B A23B when output tokens cost 15.0x less, or when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 1M tokens.

Shared results
28
Claude Sonnet 4.6 only
89
Beam 1.0 501B A23B only
0
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Sonnet 4.6 57.8 from 2 benchmarks, Beam 1.0 501B A23B 33.8 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Coding, 9.9 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: HTML: Claude Sonnet 4.6 1527 against Beam 1.0 501B A23B 1436, 15.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Sonnet 4.6 $15.00 against Beam 1.0 501B A23B $1.00 per million output tokens, 15.0x apart.
Context window
Claude Sonnet 4.6 takes 1M tokens, Beam 1.0 501B A23B 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Sonnet 4.6BarsBeam 1.0 501B A23BTies
Coding50
Reasoning30
Math20
Knowledge40
Web design20
General120
All shared boards280
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index50
Coding benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
LiveBench coding66.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev15231437Claude Sonnet 4.6
AA Coding Index63.0Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)82.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)77.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)55.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)39.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)57.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)49.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
SciCode50.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)53.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench53.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
FrontierCode24.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
WeirdML66.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: coding15031473Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: software and IT14911461Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena WebDev: React15121443Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena WebDev: HTML15271436Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena WebDev: from an image1529Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
AA Intelligence Index30.1Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index152.8Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
AA Agentic Index31.8Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1190Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1213Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1212Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1202Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1226Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1177Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LiveBench research63.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LiveBench browser68.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LiveBench long agentic23.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)51.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)25.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)38.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)60.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom79.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
APEX-Agents43.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
OSWorld 2.09.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
DeepResearch Bench54.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
OSWorld72.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Vending-Bench 2$7,204Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
GPQA Diamond85.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LiveBench reasoning86.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)83.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)87.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)33.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)87.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
ARC-AGI86.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
ARC-AGI-260.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Chess puzzles23.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Mystery game puzzles16.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14851442Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: expert15001447Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14931451Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Vision: diagrams1306Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1311Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
AIME92.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
OTIS Mock AIME85.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
ProofBench45.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: math14621459Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: mathematical work14831475Claude Sonnet 4.6
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
MMLU Pro87.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)82.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)64.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)65.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)77.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)67.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)92.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
SimpleQA Verified35.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: science14741430Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14511376Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: legal and government14701433Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: business and finance14641430Claude Sonnet 4.6
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Web design benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
Design Arena: websites12851253Claude Sonnet 4.6
Design Arena: UI components1271Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: game dev12591222Claude Sonnet 4.6
Design Arena: data viz1278Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: 3D1234Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1276Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: SVG1196Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1235Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LiveBench design71.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index120
General benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
LiveBench data analysis76.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)62.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)46.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Vals Multimodal Index60.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
IFBench56.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)80.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
DTBench89.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMCA46.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
ExploitBench23.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text14581425Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: instruction following14761430Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: creative writing14351390Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Vision1283Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: English14721436Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: non-English14401413Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: Chinese14911424Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: German1428Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1420Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1410Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: French14651461Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: Spanish1464Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Russian14401412Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: Polish1443Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14641414Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: longer queries14791429Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: writing and language14441400Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14311399Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Vision: English1298Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1307Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1296Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1248Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1195Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1272Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Document1482Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.6$0.011Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.0008Fits in one request

Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.6$0.195Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.018Fits in one request

Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.6$0.750Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.070Fits in one request

Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6Reflection Beam 1.0 501B A23B
MakerAnthropicReflection
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedFebruary 17, 2026October 16, 2026
Context window1M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$3.00$0.30
Output $/Mtok$15.00$1.00
Coding index57.833.8
Independent measurements behind it21
Cost per solved task$1.68Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Sonnet 4.6 better than Beam 1.0 501B A23B for coding?

Pick Claude Sonnet 4.6 for coding: it scores 57.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 33.8 for Beam 1.0 501B A23B. Pick Beam 1.0 501B A23B when output tokens cost 15.0x less, or when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 1M tokens.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs $0.30 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Sonnet 4.6 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?

Beam 1.0 501B A23B, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B comparison based on?

28 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Claude Sonnet 4.6's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Beam 1.0 501B A23B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next