Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs o3

Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads o3 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 30.1 to 20.2, and o3 costs 1.9x less per output token ($8.00 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 74 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic
Coding
57.3
Overall
60.3
Output $/M
$15.00
64
o3OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
51.1
Output $/M
$8.00
10
vs boards won of 74 shared

Claude Sonnet 4.6 or o3: which to pick

Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 has a coding score, 57.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; o3 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick o3 for output tokens 1.9x cheaper ($8.00 vs $15.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.571 against $1.68).

Shared results
74
Claude Sonnet 4.6 only
44
o3 only
28
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Sonnet 4.6 57.3 from 5 benchmarks, o3 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 26.4 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
ARC-AGI-2: Claude Sonnet 4.6 60.4% against o3 6.5%, 53.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Sonnet 4.6 $15.00 against o3 $8.00 per million output tokens, 1.9x apart.
Context window
Claude Sonnet 4.6 takes 1M tokens, o3 200K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Sonnet 4.6Barso3Ties
Coding41
Intelligence20
Agentic work21
Reasoning122
Math40
Knowledge84
Web design50
General272
All shared boards6410
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index41
Coding benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and o3
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6o3Leader
Aider polyglotNot measured81.3%Only o3 measured
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured58.4%Only o3 measured
SWE-bench MultimodalNot measured36.0%Only o3 measured
LiveBench coding66.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev1523Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
AA Coding Index63.0Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)82.1%83.9%o3
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)77.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)55.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)39.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)57.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)49.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured80.8%Only o3 measured
SciCode50.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)53.0%37.1%Claude Sonnet 4.6
Terminal-Bench53.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
FrontierCode24.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
GSO-BenchNot measured8.8%Only o3 measured
WeirdML66.1%52.4%Claude Sonnet 4.6
ALE-BenchNot measured933.5Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: coding15031407Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: software and IT14911415Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena WebDev: React1512Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1527Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1529Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
SciCodeNot measured9.2%Only o3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and o3
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6o3Leader
AA Intelligence Index30.120.2Claude Sonnet 4.6
Epoch Capabilities Index152.8146.7Claude Sonnet 4.6
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and o3
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6o3Leader
AA Agentic Index31.8Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1190Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1213Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1212Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1197Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1226Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1177Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LiveBench research63.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LiveBench browser68.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LiveBench long agentic23.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)51.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)25.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)38.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)60.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom79.5%80.7%o3
APEX-Agents43.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
METR time horizonsNot measured65.4%Only o3 measured
GDPvalNot measured30.8%Only o3 measured
OSWorld 2.09.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
DeepResearch Bench54.9%45.2%Claude Sonnet 4.6
OSWorld72.1%23.0%Claude Sonnet 4.6
Vending-Bench 2$7,204Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)Not measured63.0%Only o3 measured
BrowseComp-PlusNot measured65.9%Only o3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index122
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and o3
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6o3Leader
GPQA Diamond85.6%84.1%Claude Sonnet 4.6
LiveBench reasoning86.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)83.6%80.4%Claude Sonnet 4.6
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)87.5%82.7%Claude Sonnet 4.6
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)33.6%20.1%Claude Sonnet 4.6
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)87.4%81.8%Claude Sonnet 4.6
ARC-AGI86.5%60.8%Claude Sonnet 4.6
ARC-AGI-260.4%6.5%Claude Sonnet 4.6
SimpleBenchNot measured53.1%Only o3 measured
Chess puzzles23.0%37.0%o3
Mystery game puzzles16.0%29.0%o3
VPCTNot measured52.0%Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14851402Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: expert15001402Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14931411Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Vision: diagrams13061220Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Vision: homework13111234Claude Sonnet 4.6
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured67.6%Only o3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Math benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and o3
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6o3Leader
AIME92.3%85.3%Claude Sonnet 4.6
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured94.6%Only o3 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured91.8%Only o3 measured
AA Math IndexNot measured88.3Only o3 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured88.3%Only o3 measured
OTIS Mock AIME85.8%84.4%Claude Sonnet 4.6
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured33.3%Only o3 measured
ProofBench45.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
MATH level 5Not measured97.8%Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: math14621426Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: mathematical work14831423Claude Sonnet 4.6
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index84
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and o3
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6o3Leader
MMLU Pro87.3%85.6%Claude Sonnet 4.6
LegalBench (Vals AI)82.1%83.8%o3
CaseLaw (Vals AI)64.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)65.3%59.7%Claude Sonnet 4.6
TaxEval (Vals AI)77.1%74.6%Claude Sonnet 4.6
MortgageTax (Vals AI)67.7%65.7%Claude Sonnet 4.6
MedQA (Vals AI)92.1%96.1%o3
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured47.3%Only o3 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured85.3%Only o3 measured
SimpleQA Verified35.5%49.4%o3
GeoBenchNot measured74.0%Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: science14741429Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14511448Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: legal and government14701428Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: business and finance14641393Claude Sonnet 4.6
FACTS Benchmark Suite37.0%44.4%o3
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Web design benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and o3
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6o3Leader
Design Arena: websites12841036Claude Sonnet 4.6
Design Arena: UI components12691017Claude Sonnet 4.6
Design Arena: game dev12581034Claude Sonnet 4.6
Design Arena: data viz12781200Claude Sonnet 4.6
Design Arena: 3D1234Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: all code categories12751020Claude Sonnet 4.6
Design Arena: SVG1196Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1235Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LiveBench design71.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index272
General benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and o3
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6o3Leader
LiveBench data analysis76.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)62.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)46.6%41.8%Claude Sonnet 4.6
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured76.7%Only o3 measured
Vals Multimodal Index60.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
IFBench56.6%71.4%o3
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)80.0%74.7%Claude Sonnet 4.6
DTBench89.9%84.8%Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMCA46.5%39.7%Claude Sonnet 4.6
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured88.9%Only o3 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured83.9%Only o3 measured
CL-benchNot measured17.8%Only o3 measured
ExploitBench23.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text14581410Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: instruction following14761368Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: creative writing14351359Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Vision12831214Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: English14721417Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: non-English14401401Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: Chinese14911437Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: German14281420Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: Japanese14201403Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: Korean14101370Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: French14651430Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: Spanish14641395Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: Russian14401406Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: Polish14431438Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: multi-turn14641405Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: longer queries14791372Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: writing and language14441372Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14311373Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Vision: English12981221Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Vision: Chinese13071237Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Vision: reading text12961218Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Vision: humor12481222Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1210Only o3 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things11951234o3
LMArena Vision: creative writing12721201Claude Sonnet 4.6
LMArena Document1482Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and o3
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6o3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.6$0.011Fits in one request
o3$0.0060Fits in one request

o3 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.6$0.195Fits in one request
o3$0.124Fits in one request

o3 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.6$0.750Fits in one request
o3$0.480Exceeds the context window

o3 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Sonnet 4.6 and o3
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6OpenAI o3
MakerAnthropicOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedFebruary 17, 2026April 16, 2025
Context window1M200K
Input $/Mtok$3.00$2.00
Output $/Mtok$15.00$8.00
Coding index57.3Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it50
Cost per solved task$1.68$0.571
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Sonnet 4.6 better than o3 for coding?

Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 has a coding score, 57.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; o3 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick o3 for output tokens 1.9x cheaper ($8.00 vs $15.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.571 against $1.68).

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or o3?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; o3 costs $2.00 and $8.00. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $1.68 and o3 $0.571.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or o3?

Claude Sonnet 4.6, with 1M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs o3 comparison based on?

74 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Sonnet 4.6's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and o3's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next